Skip to main content
Log in

Static and dynamic uniaxial compression tests on coal rock considering the bedding directivity

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanical properties and behavior of coal rock under both static and dynamic loading rates are of importance in the coal mining practices. In this study, both quasi-static and dynamic uniaxial compression tests are conducted on coal rock, considering the bedding directivity of coal rocks using a MTS hydraulic servo-control testing machine and split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), respectively. The attained strain rates range from 10−5 to 10−2 s−1 for static tests and 20 to 100 s−1 for dynamic SHPB tests. For dynamic tests, pulse-shaping technique is utilized to achieve dynamic force balance and thus validate the quasi-static data reduction. A high-speed camera is used to capture the failure process in SHPB tests. The characteristics of failure mode, fracture strength, energy dissipation, and fractal dimension are investigated. A significant strain-rate-dependent behavior of coal rock is revealed, and the compressive strength, elasticity modulus and energy consumption increase with increasing strain rate. The bedding effect on the coal behavior at static strain rate is more prominent than that at dynamic strain rate. The measured strengths along different bedding directions exhibit distinct variations, featuring significant anisotropy. In addition, a sieving statistics analysis of the recovered fragments depicts obvious fractal; and the fracture dimension can be correlated to the fractal energy dissipation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdikan S, Arikan M, Sanli FB et al (2014) Monitoring of coal mining subsidence in peri-urban area of Zonguldak city (NW Turkey) with persistent scattered interferometry using ALOS-PALSAR. Environ Earth Sci 71(9):4081–4089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Suorineni F, Su K (2007) A study on the dynamic behavior of the Neuse/Haute-Marne argillite. Phys Chem Earth 32:907–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Azzam R, Wang M (2011) The uniaxial compressive and tensile tests of frozen saturated clay in Shanghai area. Environ Earth Sci 64(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Huang S, Xia K (2010) Some fundamental issues in dynamic compression and tension tests of rocks using Split Hopkinson pressure bar. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(6):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Xia K, Zuo J, Zhang R, Xu NW (2013) Static and dynamic flexural strength of anisotropic barre granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(6):1589–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel J, Moore LD (1907) The ultimate strength of coal. Eng Min 10:263–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA (1999) Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress-strain curve for intact rock in uniaxial compression. International Society for Rock Mechanics Commission on Testing Methods. Int J Rock Mech Min 36(3):281–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2001) A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials. Exp Mech 41(1):40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddy FL (1956) A study of the ultimate strength of coal as related to the absolute size of cubical specimens tested. West Virginia Polytechnic Bulletin 112:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray GT (2000) Classic Split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing. Mechanical testing and evaluation. ASM Int Mater Park 2000:462–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt AM, Shakoor A (1992) Determination of unconfined compressive strength of coal for pillar design. Min Eng 292:1037–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland CT, Gaddy FL (1956) Some aspects of permanent support of overburden on coal of the beds. In: Proceedings of the West Virginia Coal Mining Institute, pp 43–46

  • Hong L, Zhou Z, Ying T et al (2009) Energy consumption in rock fragmentation at intermediate strain rate. J Cent South Univ Tech 16:677–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Ranjith PG, Zhu Pan et al (2013) Effect of strain rate on strength properties of low-calcium fly-ash-based geopolymer mortar under dry condition. Arab J Geosci 6(7):2383–2389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolsky H (1953) Stress waves in solids. Clarendon press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagny C (2014) The emission of gases from abandoned mines: role of atmospheric pressure changes and air temperature on the surface. Environ Earth Sci 71(2):923–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XB, Lok TS, Zhao J, Zhao PJ (2000) Oscillation elimination in the Hopkinson bar apparatus and resultant complete dynamic stress-strain curves for rocks. Int J Rock mech Min 37:1055–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang R, Liu J (2012) Dynamic test study of coal rock under different strain rates. J China Coal Soc 9:1528–1529 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Medhurst TP, Brown ET (1998) A study of the mechanical behavior of coal for pillar design. Int J Rock Mech Min 35(8):1087–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson WA (1991) The compressive strength of tuff as a function of strain rate from 10−6 to 103 s−1. Int J Rock Mech Min 28:115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte DL (2002) Fractals in petrology. Lithos 65(3–4):261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unrug KF, Nandy S, Thompson E (1986) Evaluation of the coal strength for pillar calculation. Trans SEM AIME 280:2071–2075

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasantha PLP, Ranjith PG (2014) The Taguchi approach to the evaluation of the influence of different testing conditions on the mechanical properties of rock. Environ Earth Sci 72(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasantha PLP, Ranjith PG, Shao SS (2014) Energy monitoring and analysis during deformation of bedded-sandstone: use of acoustic emission. Ultrasonics 54(1):217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Gao F, Zhou H et al (2003) Fractal fracture and fragmentation in rocks. J Disar Prev Mit Eng 23:1–10 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie H (1996) Fractal—Rock Mechanical Introduction. Science Press (in Chinese), Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Shimada H, Sasaoka T et al (2014) Evolution and effect of the stress concentration and rock failure in the deep multi-seam coal mining. Environ Earth Sci 72(3):629–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Chen X (2013) Stress-strain behavior and statistical continuous damage model of cement mortar under high strain rates. J Mat Civ Eng 25(1):120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Li XB, Ye Z, Liu K (2010) Obtaining constitutive relationship for rate-dependent rock in SHPB tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(6):697–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Program on Key Basic Research Project (No. 2011CB201201, No. 2015CB057903) and the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51374149, 51204113,51134018).F. Dai acknowledges the support of the Program for New Century Excellent Talentsin University (NCET-13-0382) and Youth Science and Technology Fund of Sichuan Province (2014JQ0004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Dai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Dai, F., Zhang, R. et al. Static and dynamic uniaxial compression tests on coal rock considering the bedding directivity. Environ Earth Sci 73, 5933–5949 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4106-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4106-3

Keywords

Navigation