Abstract
A risk assessment of two different metal(loid)-contaminated soils (J1 and J2) collected from a former refinery site was conducted. The soil samples were sequentially washed up to 16 times with 0.1 N ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 N HNO3, or 1 N HCl and the residual concentrations of As, Pb, Cu, Cd, Zn, Ni, and Cr were determined. The hazardous indices (HI) for non-carcinogenic risk and carcinogenic risk (CR) to humans were evaluated according to the pseudo-total concentrations of metal(loid)s before and after soil washing. It was found that the most effective extractant was 1 N HNO3 (J1, 82.2 %; J2, 71.8 %), followed by 1 N HCl (J1, 74.1 %; J2, 53.8 %), and 0.1 N EDTA (J1, 35.4 %; J2. 46.9 %). Washing with 1 N HNO3, 1 N HCl, and 0.1 N EDTA reduced the HI of soil J1 by 46, 41, and 40 %, respectively and the HI of J2 by 42, 70, and 42 %, respectively. For both soils, the HI and CR exceeded the threshold limits (1 and 1 × 10−6, respectively) proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Conclusively, even after 16 soil washes, both soils required further treatment to reduce the HI and CR to within acceptable limits, which is a prerequisite for land usage for residential and non-residential purposes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bade R, Oh S, Shin WS (2012) Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) for the prediction of bioavailability of heavy metals in contaminated soils to earthworm (Eisenia foetida) and oral bioavailable concentrations. Sci Total Environ 416:127–136
Bade R, Oh S, Shin WS, Hwang I (2013) Human health risk assessment of soils contaminated with metal(loid)s by using DGT uptake: a case study of a former Korean metal refinery site. Human Ecol Risk Ass Int J 19:767–777
Bermudez GMA, Jasan R, Pla R, Pignata ML (2011) Heavy metal and trace element concentrations in wheat grains: assessment of potential non-carcinogenic health hazard through their consumption. J Hazard Mater 193:264–271
Brown DJ (1998) Characterizing risk at metal finishing facilities. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington
Chen M, Ma LQ (2001) Comparison of three aqua regia digestion methods for twenty florida soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:491–499
ECB (European Chemical Bureau) (2004) European union risk assessment report on Na2EDTA. Office for official publication of the European communities, Italy
Finzer N, Lestan D (2008) The two-phase leaching of Pb, Zn, and Cd contaminated soil using EDTA and electrochemical treatment of the washing solution. Chemosphere 73:1484–1491
Isoyama M, Wada SI (2007) Remediation of Pb-contaminated soils by washing with hydrochloric acid and subsequent immobilization with calcite and allophanic soil. J Hazard Mater 143:636–642
Jang M, Hwang JS, Choi SI (2007) Sequential soil washing techniques using hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide for remediating arsenic-contaminated soils in abandoned iron-ore mines. Chemosphere 66:8–17
Juhasz AL, Smith E, Weber J, Rees M, Rofe A, Kuchel T, Sansom L, Naidu R (2006) In vivo assessment of arsenic bioavailability in rice and its significance for human health risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 114:1826–1831
Juhasz AL, Smith E, Weber J, Rees M, Kuchel T, Rofe A, Sansom L, Naidu R (2013) Predicting lead relative bioavailability in peri-urban contaminated soils using in vitro bioaccessibility assays. J Environ Sci Health A Toxic Hazard Subst Environ Eng 48:604–611
Lim HS, Lee JS, Chon HT, Sager M (2008) Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in the vicinity of the abandoned songcheon Au-Ag mine in Korea. J Geochem Explor 96:223–230
Moon DH, Lee JR, Wazne M, Park JH (2012) Assessment of soil washing for Zn contaminated soils using various washing solutions. J Ind Eng Chem 18:822–825
Pociecha M, Lestan D (2012) Novel EDTA and process water recycling method after soil washing of multi-metals contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 201–202:273–279
Sahufquillo A, Rigol A, Rauret G (2003) Overview of the use of leaching/extraction tests for risk assessment of trace metals in contaminated soils and sediments. Trends Anal Chem 22:152–159
Shahid M, Pinelli E, Dumat C (2012) Review of Pb availability and toxicity to plants in relation with metal speciation; role of synthetic and natural organic ligands. J Hazard Mater 219–220:1–12
Swartjes FA (1999) Risk-based assessment of soil and groundwater quality in the Netherlands: standards and remediation urgency. Risk Anal 19:1235–1249
Tokunaga S, Hakuta T (2002) Acid washing and stabilization of an artificial arsenic-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 46:31–38
Torres LG, Lopez RB, Beltran M (2012) Removal of As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from a highly contaminated industrial soil using surfactant enhanced soil washing. Physics Chem Earth 37–39:30–36
Udovic M, Lestan D (2012) EDTA and HCl leaching of calcareous and acidic soils polluted with potentially toxic metals: remediation efficiency and soil impact. Chemosphere 88:718–724
US EPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, volume I: human health evaluation manual. Part A. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC (EPA/540/1-89/002, PB90-155581)
US EPA (2002) Supplement guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC (OSWER 9355.4-24)
US EPA (2004) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Volume I: Human health evaluation manual. Part E. Supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC (EPA/540/R/99/005, OSWER 9285.7-02EP, PB99-963312)
US EPA (2013) Regional screening level (RSL) resident soil table (TR = 1E−6, HQ = 1) May 2013, Pacific southwest superfund home, region 9. http://www.epa.gov/region9/superfund/prg/
US EPA (2009) Validation assessment of in vitro lead bioaccessibility assay for predicting relative bioavailability of lead in soils and soil-like materials at superfund sites. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington (OSWER 9200.3-51)
Voglar D, Lestan D (2013) Pilot-scale washing of Pb, Zn and Cd contaminated soil using EDTA and process water recycling. Chemosphere 91:76–82
Wuana RA, Okieimen FA, Imborvungu JA (2010) Removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil using organic chelating acids. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:485–496
Yang JS, Lee JY, Baek K, Kwon TS, Choi J (2009) Extraction behavior of As, Pb, and Zn from mine tailings with acid and base solutions. J Hazard Mater 171:443–451
Zhang W, Tsang DCW, Lo IMC (2007) Removal of Pb and MDF from contaminated soils by EDTA- and SDS-enhanced washing. Chemosphere 66:2025–2034
Zhang W, Huang H, Tan F, Wang H, Qiu R (2010a) Influence of EDTA washing on the species and mobility of heavy metals residual in soils. J Hazard Mater 173:369–376
Zhang W, Tong L, Yuan Y, Liu Z, Huang H, Tan F, Qiu R (2010b) Influence of soil washing with a chelator on subsequent chemical immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 178:578–587
Zou Z, Qiu R, Zhang W, Dong H, Zhao Z, Zhang T, Wei X et al (2009) The study of operating variables in soil washing with EDTA. Environ Pollut 157:229–236
Acknowledgments
This research was mainly supported by the Republic of Korea Ministry of Environment as part of the Green Remediation Research Center for Organic–Inorganic Combined Contamination (The GAIA Project-2012000550004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, S., Bade, R., Lee, H. et al. Risk assessment of metal(loid)-contaminated soils before and after soil washing. Environ Earth Sci 74, 703–713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4075-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4075-6