Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring infiltration under a real on-site treatment system of domestic wastewater and evaluation of soil transfer function (Paris Basin, France)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of evacuation of treated domestic wastewater has been investigated through a field study on a real undrained on-site treatment system (UOSTS). This system imposes a special mode of infiltration into the soil which is irregular. To characterize the hydraulic properties of this type of flow, soil texture, organic matter content and in situ saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) were measured for each 15 m2 of soil under the bottom of the UOSTS. In addition, the variation of water table and rainfall and the evolution of soil moisture and matrix potential were monitored using the sensors implanted under the system. The mean of the measured Ks is 100 times higher than values deduced from empirical pedotransfer functions based on the soil matrix properties. The measured Ks varies greatly in the 15 m2 area. Moreover, large and variable quantities of stone fragments (>2 mm) were found in the soil samples. These results suggest that a heterogeneous flow may occur in the stony soil via the macropores which shortcut the soil matrix. Indeed, according to their position, a non-uniform reaction of the sensors to the infiltration of treated wastewater was observed. In addition, two daily periodic peaks of water consumption in the house have been detected by the water content and tensiometer probes, confirming that the saturation rate is controlled by infiltration and not the water table.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikary PP, Chakraborty D, Kalra N, Sachdev CB, Patra K, Kumar S, Tomar P, Chandna D, Raghav K, Agrawal RK, Sehgal M (2008) Pedotransfer functions for predicting the hydraulic properties of Indian soils. Aust J Soil Res 46:476–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allaire SE, Stéphanie SB, Cessna AJ (2009) Quantifying preferential flow in soils: a review of different techniques. J Hydrol 378:179–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K, Germann P (1982) Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour Res 18:1311–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigand S, Lesieur V (2008) Assainissement non collectif. Le moniteur, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvet R (2003) Le Sol: propriétés et fonctions. Edition France Agricole, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs S, Flint AL (1990) Physical properties of forest soils containing stone fragments. In: Weetman GF, Powers RF (eds) Sustained productivity of forest soils, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, pp 95–121

  • Cosby BJ, Homberger GM, Clapp RB, Ginn TR (1984) A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resour Res 20:682–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousin I, Nicoullaud B, Coutadeur C (2003) Influence of rock fragments on the water retention and water percolation in calcareous soil. Catena 53:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrick DE, Reynolds WD, Tan KA (1989) Hydraulic conductivity measurements in the unsaturated zone using improved well analyses. GWMR 9:184–193

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description. FAO, Rome

  • Ferrer-Julià M, Estrela Monreal T, Sánchez Corral del Jiménez A, García Meléndez E (2004) Constructing a saturated hydraulic conductivity map of Spain using pedotransfer functions and spatial prediction. Geoderma 123:275–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiès JC, Louvigny N (de), Chanzy A (2002) The role of stones in soil water retention. Eur J Soil Sci 53:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flury M, Flühler H, Jury WA, Leuenberger J (1994) Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: a field study. Water Resour Res 30:1945–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle-size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 4 physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, pp 255–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómes JA, Giraldez JV, Fereres E (2001) Analysis of infiltration and runoff in an olive orchard under no-till. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hénin S (1976) Cours de physique du sol, vol 1. Orstom Edition, Paris. Documentation technique, no 28

  • Lawes JB, Gilbert JH, Warington R (1982) On the amount and composition of the rain and drainage water collected at Rothamsted. W. Clowes and Sons Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DM, Reynolds DW, Elrick DE, Clothier BE (1985) A comparison of three methods for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. Can J Soil Sci 65:573–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Ou ZQ, Ying PF (2001) Soil macropores and their research methodology. Chin J Appl Ecol 12:465–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma DH, Shao MG (2008) Simulating infiltration into stony soils with a dual-porosity model. Eur J Soil Sci 59:950–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma D, Shao M, Zhang J, Wang Q (2010) Validation of an analytical method for determining soil hydraulic properties of stony soils using experimental data. Geoderma 159:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty BP, Kanwar RS, Everts CJ (1994) Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measurement methods for a glacial-till soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:672–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasri B, Fouché O, Saillé Ch, Forquet N, Seidl M, De Laure E (2012) Field monitoring and sampling of infiltrated soil water under on-site treatment systems, 4th International Congress of soil science societies (ECSSS), Bari-Italy

  • Poesen J, Lavee H (1994) Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes. Catana 23:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds WD, Bowman BT, Brunke RR, Drury CF, Tan CS (2000) Comparison of tension infiltrometer, pressure infiltrometer, and soil core estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:478–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Xu L, Wang Y, Yang X, Yang Z, Jia H, Guo W, Xiong Yu (2012) Effect of rock fragments on macropores and water effluent in a forest soil in the stony mountains of the Loess Plateau, China. Afr J Biotechnol 11:9350–9361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2010) Keys to soil taxonomy, 11th edn. USDA/Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington, DC

  • Spomer LA (1980) Prediction and control of porosity and water retention in sand soil mixtures for drained turf sites. Agron J 72:361–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart VI, Adams WA, Abdulla HH (1970) Quantitative pedological studies on soils derived from Silurian mudstones. II. The relationship between stone content and the apparent density of the fine earth. J Soil Sci 21:248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetegan M, Nicoullaud B, Baize D, Bouthier A, Cousin I (2011) The contribution of rock fragments to the available water content of stony soils: proposition of new pedotransfer functions. Geoderma 165:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Poesen J, Monica F, Busoni E (1994) Rock fragment content and fine soil bulk density. Catena 23:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towner GD (1988) The influence of sand- and silt-size particles on the cracking during drying of small clay dominated aggregates. J Soil Sci 39:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanek E, Shakesby RA (2009) Impact of stone content on water movement in water-repellent sand. Eur J Soil Sci 60:412–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbist KMJ, Cornelis WM, Torfs S, Gabriels D (2012) Comparing methods to determine hydraulic conductivities on stony soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weihermuller J, Siemens M, Deurer S, Knoblauch H, Rupp A, Göttlein K, Pütz T (2007) In situ soil water extraction: a review. J Environ Qual 36:1737–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou BB, Shao MA, Shao HB (2009) Effects of rock fragments on water movement and solute transport in a Loess Plateau soil. CR Geosci 341:462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For their financial support, the authors would like to thank the GESSOL program (French Ministry of Ecology, ADEME) through the ANCRES project, and the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behzad Nasri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasri, B., Fouché, O. & Ramier, D. Monitoring infiltration under a real on-site treatment system of domestic wastewater and evaluation of soil transfer function (Paris Basin, France). Environ Earth Sci 73, 7435–7444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3917-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3917-y

Keywords

Navigation