Skip to main content
Log in

Particle fractal dimension and total phosphorus of soil in a typical watershed of Yangtze River, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phosphorous (P) is an essential nutrient in soil which can lead to eutrophication when eroding into rivers or lakes. As a new method to represent soil properties, fractal theory was applied to study soil characteristics and related process. To understand the correlation of total soil P (TSP) and fractal dimension (D) with the effect of soil depth and slope gradient, soil grid samples were collected at 0–10, 10–20 and 20–40 cm depths in Yingwugou watershed, Yangtze River, China. The physico-chemical properties of the samples were analyzed to determine the TSP content and D. Fractal scaling theory was then applied to establish the relationship between D and TSP. With silt as the dominant particle size, the D values of the study area were in the range of 2.42–2.55. On the flat ground, more fine particles (clay and silt) were reserved and on the contrary relatively high content of coarse sand was retained on steep slope. D values decreased with slope and soil depth increased. The average TSP contents of the three layers were 0.65, 0.63 and 0.57 g/kg for 0–10, 10–20 and 20–40 cm, respectively, showing a decreasing tendency with increased soil depth. With increasing slope gradient, the TSP contents decreased first and then increased slowly. The TSP contents were positively related to silt content (P < 0.05) and clay content (P < 0.05) and negatively associated with sand contents (P < 0.01). There was an one-dimensional linear relationship (n = 530, R 2 = 0.16, P < 0.01) between TSP content and D values. The correlation would improve when concrete slope was taken into account. To better understand and control soil erosion, the relationship between D value and soil nutrients deserves more attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas A, Mohammad-Reza N, Hassan R, Hossein A (2011) Fractal dimension of soil aggregates as an index of soil erodibility. J Hydrol 400:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adejuwon JOA, Ekanade O (1988) A comparison of soil properties under different landuse types in a part of the Nigerian cocoa belt. Catena 15:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albanese S, De Vivo B, Lima A, Cicchella D (2007) Geochemical background and baseline values of toxic elements in stream sediments of Campania region (Italy). J Geochem Explor 93:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrés D, Cristina C, Fernando M et al (2009) Response of earthworm communities to soil disturbance: Fractal dimension of soil and species’ rank-abundance curves. Appl Soil Ecol 43:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Agterberg FP, Ballantyne SB (1994) The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods. J Geochem Explor 51:109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CM (1993) Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems—a review. J Environ Qual 22:402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coşkun G (2006) Effect of forage cropping treatments on soil structure and relationships with fractal dimensions. Geoderma 131:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel RH, Daniel G, Vandana S, Brian FP (2013) Fractal distribution of mass from the millimeter- to decimeter-scale in two soils under native and restored tallgrass prairie. Geoderma 207–208:121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado A, Scalanghe R (2008) Aspects of phosphorus transfer from soils in Europe. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:552–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng J, Wang QF, Yang LQ et al (2010) Delineation and explanation of geochemical anomalies using fractal models in the Heqing area, Yunnan province, China. J Geochem Explor 105:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elci S, Selcuk P (2013) Effects of basin activities and land use on water quality trends in Tahtali Basin, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 68:1591–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erasahin S, Gunal H, Kutlu T, Yetgin B, Coban S (2006) Estimating specific surface area and cation exchange capacity in soils using fractal dimension of particle-size distribution. Geoderma 136:588–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Martínez M, Sánchez-Granero MA (2013) Fractal dimension for fractal structures. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2013.10.010

  • Frontier S (1987) Applications of fractal theory to ecology. In: Legendre P, Legendre L (eds) Developments in numerical ecology, vol G14. NATO ASI Series, p 585

  • Hamid G, Ahmad RM, David RC (2013) A comparison of fractal methods and probability plots in identifying and mapping soil metal contamination near an active mining area, Iran. Sci Total Environ. 463–464:845–854

  • Hany EK, Zhang HF, Zhang PC et al (2013) Soil erosion and surface runoff on different vegetation covers and slope gradients: a field experiment in Southern Shaanxi Province, China. Catena 105:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin XC, Tu QY (1990) Standards for Lake Eutrophication Investigation. China Environmental Science, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW, Park JS, Kim D et al (2014) Runoff characteristics of non-point pollutants caused by different land uses and a spatial overlay analysis with spatial distribution of industrial cluster: a case study of the Lake Sihwa watershed. Environ Earth Sci 71:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Ma T, Shi J (2003) Application of a fractal method relating concentrations and distances for separation of geochemical anomalies from background. J Geochem Explor 77:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SY, Gu S, Tan X, Zhang QF (2009) Water quality in the upper Han River basin, China: the impacts of land use/land cover in riparian buffer zone. J Hazard Mater 165:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SY, Li J, Zhang QF (2011) Water quality assessment in the rivers along the water conveyance system of the Middle Route of the South to North Water Transfer Project (China) using multivariate statistical techniques and receptor modeling. J Hazard Mater 195:306–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li MM, Zhang XC, Pang GW, Han FP (2013) The estimation of soil organic carbon distribution and storage in a small catchment area of the Loess Plateau. Catena 101:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luis AC, Jorge RV, Luis MG, Arturo Q (2012) Characterization of spherical core-shell particles by static light scattering. Estimation of the core- and particle-size distributions. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 113:2255–2264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbort BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman M, San Francisco, pp 45–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1967) How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 165:636–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marciel R, Sylvie R, Celso A et al (2014) How the chemical composition and heterogeneity of crop residue mixtures decomposing at the soil surface affects C and N mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 78:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell RW, Sharpley AN, Folmar G (2003) Modification of phosphorus export from an eastern USA catchment by fluvial sediment and phosphorus inputs. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra RK, Teixeira PC (2001) The sensitivity of erosion and erodibility of forest soils to structure and strength. Soil Tillage Res 59(1–2):81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-de las HM (2009) Development of soil physical structure and biological functionality in mining spoils affected by soil erosion in a Mediterranean–continental environment. Geoderma 149(3–4):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen KL, Miller CR, Beck D, Lynch JP (1999) Fractal geometry of root systems: field observations of contrasting genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under different phosphorus regimes. Plant Soil 206:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldrich Z, Peter D, Michal V (2013) Entropy of fractal systems. Comput Math Appl 66:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick L, Nubia R, Orlando A, Jaime B, Cesar B et al (2014) Soil ecosystem services and land use in the rapidly changing Orinoco River Basin of Colombia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 185:106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosperini N, Perugini D (2008) Particle size distributions of some soils from the Umbria Region (Italy): fractal analysis and numerical modeling. Geoderma 145:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieu M, Sposito G (1991) Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity and soil water properties: II. Application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1239–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Cohen DR (2005) Fractally invariant distributions and an application in geochemical exploration. Math Geol 37:895–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Sun YP, Zhao XG, Qu B (2013) Influence on sorption property of Pb by fractal and site energy distribution about sediment of Yellow River. Proc Environ Sci 18:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokołowska Z, Warchulska P, Sokołowski S (2009) Trends in soil fractal parameters caused by accumulation of soil organic matter as resulting from the analysis of water vapor adsorption isotherms. Ecol Complex 6:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tim H, Rehan S, Asit M (2012) Adaptation and evaluation of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) for use as an effective tool to characterize drinking source water quality. Water Res 46:3544–3552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiphaine C, Thierry W, Joele T, Eric B (2010) Organic carbon stabilization in the fractal pore structure of Andosols. Geoderma 159:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1989) Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:987–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1992) Fractal scaling of soil particle size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LZ, Fang L, Hipel KW (2003) Water resource allocation: a cooperative game approach. J Environ Inform 2:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei SK, Gnauck A (2007) Water supply and water demand of Beijing—a game theoretic approach for modeling. In: Gómez JM, Sonnenschein M, Muller M, Welsch H, Rautenstrauch C (eds) Information technologies in environmental engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 525–536

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Withers PJA, Hodgkinson RA, Bates A, Withers CL (2007) Soil cultivation effects on sediment and phosphorus mobilization in surface runoff from three contrasting soil types in England. Soil Tillage Res 93:438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF (Worls Wide Fund for Nature) (2003) Report suggests China’s Grain-to-Green plan is fundamental to managing water and soil erosion. http://www.wwfchina.org/english/loca.php?loca=159

  • Xu G, Jn Sun, Hb Shao, Scott XC (2014a) Biochar had effects on phosphorus sorption and desorption in three soils with differing acidity. Ecol Eng 62:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu GC, Li ZB, Li P et al (2014b) Spatial variability of soil available phosphorus in a typical watershed in the source area of the middle Dan River, China. Environ Earth Sci 71:3953–3962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye XF, Bai JH, Lu QQ et al (2014) Spatial and seasonal distributions of soil phosphorus in a typical seasonal flooding wetland of the Yellow River Delta, China. Environ Earth Sci 71:4811–4820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder R (1936) A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses. J Am Soc Agric 28:337–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zglobicki W (2013) Impact of microtopography on the geochemistry of soils within archaeological sites in SE Poland. Environ Earth Sci 70:3085–3092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Fu G, Lei K, Li YW (2011) Multivariate analysis of surface water quality in the three Gorges area of China and implications for water management. J Environ Sci 23:1460–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo R (2011) Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with Cu and Pb-Zn skarn mineralization using principal component analysis and spectrum-area fractal modeling in the Gandese Belt, Tibet (China). J Geochem Explor 111:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (No. 41330858), the Characters of Root Behavior in Vegetation Restoration Process and Its Response with Soil Water Resources (No. 41271290). The authors thank the reviewers for constructive reviews of this paper. They also gratefully acknowledge Tang Shanshan, Long Feifei, Cheng Yuting, Jin Yurong and Yao jingwei for samples analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanbin Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Li, Z. & Li, P. Particle fractal dimension and total phosphorus of soil in a typical watershed of Yangtze River, China. Environ Earth Sci 73, 6091–6099 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3833-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3833-1

Keywords

Navigation