Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A three-component hydrograph separation based on relationship between organic and inorganic component concentrations: a case study in Eastern Siberia, Russia

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical monitoring data on two rivers draining small-scale and medium-scale watersheds were collected and analyzed. It was shown that the variability in stream water chemistry is explained mostly by two natural processes. The first process is the change in dominant water flow path in soil during the year and the second process is the change in water table depth. These changes are reflected in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to base cations (BC) ratio (DOC/BC). The increase of DOC/BC ratio (or decrease of BC/DOC ratio) from winter to summer is due to proportional dilution of groundwater by near-surface flow. The decrease of DOC/BC ratio from summer to winter is due to dilution by interflow. The ratio values typical for hydrological periods, when one of the sources absolutely predominated over the others were used as end-member signatures. The solute concentrations calculated using discharge fractions derived from mixing equations were highly correlated to those measured in riverine water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adji TN (2012) Wet season hydrochemistry of Bribin Cave in Gunung Sewu Karst, Indonesia. Environ Earth Sci 67:1563–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthold FK, Tyralla C, Schneider K, Vache KB, Frede HG, Breuer L (2011) How many tracers do we need for end member mixing analysis (EMMA)? A sensitivity analysis. Water Resour Res 47:W08519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown VA, McDonnell JJ, Burns DA, Kendall K (1999) The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow. J Hydrol 217:171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DA, McDonnell JJ, Hooper RP, Peters NE, Freer JE, Kendall C, Beven K (2001) Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end-member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA). Hydrol Process 15:1903–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttle JM (1994) Isotope hydrograph separations and rapid delivery of pre-event water from drainage basins. Prog Phys Geogr 18:16–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Driscoll CT (2005) A two layer model to simulate variations in surface water chemistry draining a northern forest watershed. Water Resour Res 41:W09425. doi:10.1029/2004WR003625

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophersen N, Hooper RP (1992) Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: the use of principal component analysis for the end-member mixing problem. Water Resour Res 28:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimo CP, McDonnell JJ (1997) Linking the hydrologic and biogeochemical controls of nitrogen transport in near-stream zones of temperate-forested catchments: a review. J Hydrol 199:88–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalle DR, Swistock BR, Sharpe WE (1988) Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment. J Hydrol 104:301–310. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(88)90171-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinser T, Payne BR, Florkowski T, Martinec J, Tongiorgi E (1970) Snowmelt runoff from measurements of tritium and oxygen-18. Water Resour Res 6(1):110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen KH (2000) Multivariate data analysis—practice, 4th edn. Camo, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinha MJ, Samper J, Pisani B, Alvares D, Carvalho J, Chamine HI, Marques J, Vieira G, Mora C, Sodre BF (2011) Evaluation of water resources in a high-mountain basin in Serra da Estrela, Central Portugal, using a semi-distributed hydrological model. Environ Earth Sci 62(6):1219–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeeze R (1972) Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff—1. Base flow contributions to channel flow. Water Resour Res 8(3):609–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FR (1968) Baseflow recessions—a review. Water Resour Res 4(5):973–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR (1963) Moisture and energy considerations within a sloping soil mass during drainage. J Geophys Res 64:1081–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton MJ, Schiff SL, English MC (1994) Examining the contributions of glacial till water to storm runoff using 2-component and 3-component hydrograph separations. Water Resour Res 30(4):983–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holko L, Lepisto A (1997) Modelling the hydrological behavior of a mountain catchment using TOPMODEL. J Hydrol 196:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper RP (2001) Applying the scientific method to small catchment studies: a review of the Panola Mountain experience. Hydrol Process 15:2039–2050. doi:10.1002/hyp.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper RP (2003) Diagnostic tools for mixing models of stream water chemistry. Water Resour Res 39:1055. doi:10.1029/2002WR001528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper RP, Christophersen N, Peters NE (1990) Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members—an application to the Panola mountain catchment, Georgia, U.S.A. J Hydrol 116:321–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inamdar SP, Mitchell MJ (2006) Hydrologic and topographic controls on storm-event exports of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrate across catchment scales. Water Resour Res 42:W03421. doi:10.1029/2005WR004212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy VC, Kendall C, Zellweger GW, Wyerman TA, Avanzino RJ (1986) Determination of the components of stormflow using water chemistry and environmental isotopes, Mattole River basin, California. J Hydrol 84:107–140. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(86)90047-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus J, McDonnell JJ (2013) Hydrograph separation using stable isotopes: review and evaluation. J Hydrol 505:47–64. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaSala AM Jr (1967) New approaches to water-resources investigations in upstate New York. Ground Water 5(4):6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Williams M, Caine N (2004) Source waters and flowpaths in a seasonally snow-covered catchment, Colorado Front Range USA. Water Resour Res 40:W09401. doi:10.29/2004WR003076

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik P, Vojtkova S (2012) Use of recession-curve analysis for estimation of karstification degree and its application in assessing overflow/underflow conditions in closely spaced karstic springs. Environ Earth Sci 65:2245–2257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale MR, McDonnell JJ, Mitchel MJ, Crimo CP (2002) A field-based study of soil water and groundwater nitrate release in an Andirondack forested watershed. Water Resour Res 38(4):1031. doi:10.1029/2000WR000102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses. Water Resour Res 26(7):1465–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunkoya OO, Jenkins A (1993) Analysis of storm hydrograph and flow pathways using a three-component hydrograph separation model. J Hydrol 142:71–88. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90005-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag 2:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perakis SS (2002) Nutrient limitation, hydrology and watershed nitrogen loss. Hydrol Process 16:3507–3511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder GF, Jones JF (1969) Determination of ground-water component of peak discharge from chemistry of total runoff. Water Resour Res 5(2):438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice KC, Hornberger GM (1998) Comparison of hydrochemical tracers to estimate source contributions to peak flow in a small, forested, headwater catchment. Water Resour Res 34:1755–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard C, Lefebvre R, Paradis D (2014) Regional recharge estimation using multiple methods: an application in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia (Canada). Environ Earth Sci 71:1389–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwientek M, Osenbruck K, Fleischer M (2013) Investigating hydrological drivers of nitrate export dynamics in two agricultural catchments in Germany using high-frequency data series. Environ Earth Sci 69:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MY, Zimnik EA (2009) Surface water chemistry: the key to partitioning dissolved matter sources and assessing carbon cycle parameters. Chem Ecol 25(5):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MY, Khodzher TV, Obolkin VA, Domysheva VM, Golobokova LP, Kobeleva NA, Netsvetaeva OG, Potemkin VL, Fukuzaki N, Van Grieken R (2006) Assessing the acidification risk in Lake Baikal region. Chem Ecol 22:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MY, Zimnik EA, Khodzher TV (2012) Revealing the origin of solutes in surface water using the relationship between organic and inorganic component concentrations. Environ Forensics 13:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanley JB, Kendall C, Smith TE, Wolock DM, McDonnell JJ (2002) Controls on old and new water contributions to stream flow at some nested catchments in Vermont USA. Hydrol Process 16:589–609. doi:10.1002/hyp.312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2004) STATISTICA 7. http://www.statsoft.com/

  • Swistock BR, DeWalle DR, Sharpe WE (1989) Sources of acidic storm flow in an Appalachian headwater stream. Water Resour Res 25:2139–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Votintsev KK, Glazunov IV, Tolmacheva AP (1995) Gidrokhimiya rek basseina ozera Baikal (In Russian). Nauka, Moscow, p 495

    Google Scholar 

  • Wels C, Cornett RJ, Lazerte BD (1991) Hydrograph separation: a comparison of geochemical and isotopic tracers. J Hydrol 122:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Xiao H, Zou S, Zhao L, Zhou M, Hou L, Wang F (2012) Hydrochemical and hydrological processes in the different landscape zones of alpine cold region in China. Environ Earth Sci 65:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by Russian Academy of Sciences Project No. VIII.76.1.5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Limnological Institute of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Batorskaya st. 3, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia

    M. Y. Semenov

  2. Institute of Geography of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Batorskaya st. 1, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia

    E. A. Zimnik

Authors
  1. M. Y. Semenov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. A. Zimnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Y. Semenov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semenov, M.Y., Zimnik, E.A. A three-component hydrograph separation based on relationship between organic and inorganic component concentrations: a case study in Eastern Siberia, Russia. Environ Earth Sci 73, 611–620 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3533-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3533-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation