Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of a low-nickel diet and nickel sensitization on gastroesophageal reflux disease: A pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Aims

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common medical condition, frequently refractory to medical therapy. Nickel is a leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Although nickel is widely found in foods, the effect of nickel on GERD is unknown. This pilot study sought to evaluate the effect of a low-nickel diet on GERD and determine if epicutaneous patch testing to nickel could predict responsiveness to a low-nickel diet.

Methods

This prospective, single-site pilot study recruited 20 refractory GERD patients as determined by GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scores. All patients had epicutaneous patch testing for nickel and were then instructed to follow a low-nickel diet for 8 weeks regardless of patch test results. GERD-HRQL was recorded at baseline and following 8 weeks of a low-nickel diet. Demographic and clinical data associated with GERD and nickel allergy were recorded. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data were run to determine statistical significance in pre- and post- GERD-HRQL scores in nickel patch test–positive and negative groups.

Results

Nearly all (19/20 [95%]) participants reported reduced GERD symptoms after 8 weeks on a low-nickel diet. Mean total GERD-HRQL, regurgitation, and heartburn scores declined (27.05 ± 16.04, 11.45 ± 6.46, 10.85 ± 8.29). Participants with positive vs. negative patch testing to nickel responded equivalently to a low-nickel diet.

Conclusions

A low-nickel diet improves GERD symptoms, but responsiveness to a low-nickel diet does not correlate with epicutaneous patch testing to nickel.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03720756

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:254-72.e11.

  2. Gayam S, Zinn Z, Chelliah M, Teng J. Patch testing in gastrointestinal diseases–a systematic review of the patch test and atopy patch test. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:e349–51.

  3. Lacono G, Carroccio A, Cavataio F, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and cow’s milk allergy in infants: a prospective study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97:822–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavataio F, Carroccio A, Iacono G. Milk-induced reflux in infants less than one year of age. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30:S36-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salvatore S, Vandenplas Y. Gastroesophageal reflux and cow milk allergy: is there a link? Pediatrics. 2002;110:972–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yukselen A, Celtik C. Food allergy in children with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pediatr Int. 2016;58:254–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Boissieu D, Waguet J, Dupont C. The atopy patch tests for detection of cow’s milk allergy with digestive symptoms. J Pediatr. 2003;142:203–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Kruse-Andersen S, Husby S. Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease and cow milk hypersensitivity in infants and children: disease association and evaluation of a new challenge procedure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39:383–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pomiecinski F, Yang AC, Navarro-Rodrigues T, et al. Sensitization to foods in gastroesophageal reflux disease and its relation to eosinophils in the esophagus: is it of clinical importance? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105:359–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanghellini V, Tosetti C, Benedetto E, et al. Nickel sensitization in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:184–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aslan N, Sezikli M, Erdal E. Nickel sensitivity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017;36:347–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zug KA, Pham AK, Belsito DV, et al. Patch testing in children from 2005 to 2012: results from the North American contact dermatitis group. Dermatitis. 2014;25:345–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campanale M, Nucera E, Ojetti V, et al. Nickel free-diet enhances the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate: a pilot study. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1851–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma AD. Relationship between nickel allergy and diet. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73:307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:130–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fregert S. Manual of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1981. p. 71–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2004;18:879–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Domhof S, Langer F. Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments: Wiley-Interscience; 2002.

  19. Shah N, Jalali O, Glover B, Zinn Z. A 5 year retrospective review of contact dermatitis patch testing in West Virginia. W V Med J. 2018;114:36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Di MG, Masci S, Cavallucci E, et al. Immuno-histopathologic changes in the gastrointestinal mucosa in patients with nickel contact allergy. G Ital Med Lav. 1995;17:33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sifrim D, Zerbib F. Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2012;61:1340–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under the West Virginia Clinical Translational Science Institute Award Number 5U54GM104942-04. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript. The respective roles of each author are the following: A.Y.: patient recruitment, data analysis, and drafting the manuscript; R.H.: study design and patient recruitment; M.M.: patient recruitment; E.G.: data analysis and critical revision of the manuscript for valuable intellectual content; W.F.: statistical analysis; R.C.: literature review and critical revision of the manuscript for valuable intellectual content; Z.Z. and S.G.: study concept, design, patient recruitment, and critical revision of the manuscript for valuable intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swapna Gayam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AY, RH, MM, EG, WF, RC, ZZ, and SG declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors had access to study data and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics statement

The study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com. The study was conducted after obtaining proper ethical clearance from the institutional ethics committee.

IRB statement

The study protocol was approved by the West Virginia University institutional review board.

Guarantor of the article

Senior author Swapna Gayam, MD, accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study, has had access to the data, and controls the decision to publish.

Disclaimer

The authors are solely responsible for the data and the contents of the paper. In no way, the Honorary Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Board Members, the Indian Society of Gastroenterology or the printer/publishers are responsible for the results/findings and content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousaf, A., Hagen, R., Mitchell, M. et al. The effect of a low-nickel diet and nickel sensitization on gastroesophageal reflux disease: A pilot study. Indian J Gastroenterol 40, 137–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01090-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01090-3

Keywords

Navigation