Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A prospective study to determine the clinical profile, outcome, and factors predicting mortality

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), defined differently by different associations, lacks consensus on clinical profile, precipitating events and factors predicting mortality. This prospective multicentric study was conducted to determine the relevance of European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) and Asia Pacific Association for Study of Liver (APASL) definitions and to determine prognostic factors predicting the survival.

Methods

Consecutive patients over a 3-month period with any form of acute deterioration were evaluated for presence of ACLF, as defined by APASL or EASL-Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF) criteria. Those enrolled underwent complete evaluation for identifying the acute insults, underlying chronic etiologies, presence of organ failures, and short-term survival.

Results

Sixty-two patients (median age 53 years, 51 males) who presented with either raised bilirubin (n = 52), international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 (n = 46), new onset ascites (n = 53), or hepatic encephalopathy (n = 39) were included in study. Forty-four patients (36 males, 25 alcoholics) satisfied APASL definition of ACLF, with a mortality rate of 43.1 %. Hepatic encephalopathy (p-value 0.022) was significantly associated with mortality. By CLIF-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score criteria for organ failure, 50 patients (80.6 %) had at least 1 organ failure whereas 15 had ≥3 organ failures (mortality rate >75 %). Twenty-nine patients classified as ACLF (1, 2, or 3) as per EASL-CLIF criteria. Bacterial infection, >1 precipitating event, additional organ failure, total leukocyte count, INR, and serum creatinine were significantly higher in patients with ACLF across all grades. Mortality rates were 6.6 and >60 % in patients with ACLF only by APASL criteria vs. by both criteria, respectively.

Conclusions

ACLF, as defined by APASL in terms of liver failure, identified some patients with better survival rates as compared to EASL-CLIF definition which identifies presence of additional organ failures and high mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jalan R, Williams R. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: pathophysiological basis of therapeutic options. Blood Purif. 2002;20:252–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jalan R, Stadlbauer V, Sen S, et al. Role of predisposition, injury, response and organ failure in the prognosis of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R227.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarin SK, Kumar A, Almeida JA, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL). Hepatol Int. 2009;3:269–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreau R, Gines P, Jalan R, et al. Diagnosis, prevalence, and prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): results of the EASL-chronic liver failure (CLIF) consortium canonic study. J Hepatol. 2012;56:S552–3.

  5. Garg H, Kumar A, Garg V, et al. Clinical profile and predictors of mortality in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:166–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishna YR, Saraswat VA, Das K, et al. Clinical features and predictors of outcome in acute hepatitis A and hepatitis E virus hepatitis on cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2009;29:392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng MH, Shi KQ, Fan YC, et al. A model to determine 3-month mortality risk in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.

  9. Rastogi A, Kumar A, Sakhuja P, et al. Liver histology as predictor of outcome in patients with acute-onchronic liver failure (ACLF). Virchows Arch. 2011;459:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang K, Hu JH, Wang HF, et al. Survival and prognostic factors in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:3448–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhihui X, Xiaoqiang R, Yan L, et al. Association of hepatitis B virus mutations in basal core promoter and precore regions with severity of liver disease: an investigation of 793 Chinese patients with mild and severe chronic hepatitis B and acute-on-chronic liver failure. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Acharya SK, Sharma PK, Singh R, et al. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in patients with cirrhosis is associated with rapid decompensation and death. J Hepatol. 2007;46:387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar M, Sharma BC, Sarin SK. Hepatitis E virus as an etiology of acute exacerbation of previously unrecognized asymptomatic patients with hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:883–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Radha Krishna Y, Saraswat VA, Das K, et al. Clinical features and predictors of outcome in acute hepatitis A and hepatitis E virus hepatitis on cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2009;29:392–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Duseja A, Chawla YK, Dhiman RK, et al. Non-hepatic insults are common acute precipitants in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3188–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malik R, Mookerjee RP, Jalan R. Infection and inflammation in liver failure: two sides of the same coin. J Hepatol. 2009;51:426–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia Q, Dai X, Zhang Y, et al. A modified MELD model for Chinese pre-ACLF and ACLF patients and it reveals poor prognosis in pre-ACLF patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khuroo MS, Khuroo MS, Farahat KL. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system for acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: a meta-analysis. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:1099–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan AC, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure. Hepatol Int. 2009;3:571–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sen S, Davies NA, Mookerjee RP, et al. Pathophysiological effects of albumin dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a randomized controlled study. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:1109–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

DA, MVD, MC, RB, PK, MJ, NP, PK, SI, NS, SK, SG, AS, and SD all confirm that they have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethics statement

The study was performed in a manner to conform to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human and animal rights, and that the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrudul V Dharod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amarapurkar, D., Dharod, M.V., Chandnani, M. et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A prospective study to determine the clinical profile, outcome, and factors predicting mortality. Indian J Gastroenterol 34, 216–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-015-0574-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-015-0574-3

Keywords

Navigation