Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of ALT Perforator Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction

  • REVIEW PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The anterolateral thigh flap is a versatile flap that offers many advantages. These include a long and reliable pedicle that enables a wide arc of rotation, the possibility to harvest a large skin area, raising the flap with underlying fascia and minimal donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study is to show better esthetics and function with the use of ALT perforator flap in head and neck region. It is a large prospective case study done in our institute with regular follow-up which shows the outcomes of ALT flap.

Materials and Method

From 2020 to 2022, hundred patients were reconstructed with anterolateral thigh flap. The flap was used for reconstruction in head and neck region. The patient group consisted of 53 males and 47 females. The age range was 30–90 years with a mean age of 61 years. Patients who had extensive soft tissue defect in the head and neck and had been reconstructed by free ALT flap have been reported. Flap data (type, length, and width), duration of flap elevation, donor-site morbidity, post-operative complications, and follow-up data including aesthetic and functional outcome were recorded.

Results

We experienced no flap loss. The donor site was closed directly in twenty-eight out of eighty patients, and the remaining twenty patients were closed by split thickness skin grafting. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcome were achieved in all patients.

Conclusion

Our experience illustrates the versatility in the clinical application of the anterolateral thigh flap. The many advantages of the flap, such as the long and reliable pedicle, a large area of skin that can be harvested, the potential to supercharge the flap and the minimal donor site morbidity, highlight the diversity of defects that can be reconstructed using this flap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kekatpure VD, Trivedi NP, Shetkar G, Manjula BV, Mohan AM, Kuriakose MA (2011) Single perforator based anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of large composite defects of oral cavity. Oral Oncol 47(6):517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chana JS, Odili J (2010) Perforator flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Sem Plast Surg 24(03):237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu ZF, Sun CF, Duan WY, Zhang EJ, Dai W, Zheng XJ, Liu FY, Tan XX (2013) Clinical anatomical study and evaluation of the use of the free anteromedial thigh perforator flaps in reconstructions of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51(8):725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff KD (2015) Perforator flaps: The next step in the reconstructive ladder? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53(9):787–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madsen CB, Sørensen JA (2020) Versatility of the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for surgical reconstruction, a case series. JPRAS Open 1(25):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JT, Kim SW (2015) Perforator flap versus conventional flap. J Korean Med Sci 30(5):514–522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kidd T, Platt N, Kidd D, Grobbelaar AO (2022) Short-and long-term complications of free anterolateral thigh flap reconstructions: a single-centre experience of 92 consecutive cases. Surg Res Pract 8:2022

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E (2009) Free flaps: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstructions. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 37(8):438–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, India

    Sagarika Khowala, M. E. Sham, Thyagraj Reddy, Suresh Menon & S. Archana

Authors
  1. Sagarika Khowala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. E. Sham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thyagraj Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Suresh Menon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Archana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sagarika Khowala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khowala, S., Sham, M.E., Reddy, T. et al. Role of ALT Perforator Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01990-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01990-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation