Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of two L shaped Plate on Plate Versus Single Conventional L Miniplate in Fixation of Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To compare and evaluate treatment outcome and postoperative complications in subcondylar fractures of mandible–single L shape plate versus two L shape plate–using plate on plate technique.

Materials and Methods

The clinical trial had a total of ten patients (ten unilateral subcondylar fracture sites), which were divided randomly into two groups of five each. Group I patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with single L shaped miniplate and Group II ORIF was done with two L shaped miniplates by plate on plate technique.

Results

Both the groups showed comparable results in terms of postoperative complications. Few cases in Group I presented with minor occlusal discrepancy which was easily corrected with transitional inter-maxillary fixation(IMF) for 1 week, and none of the Group II cases required postoperative IMF, but stability in Group II was better than Group I.

Conclusion

The results of this trial suggested that the treatment of mandibular condylar fractures with 2 (2-D) plates placed one over the other is better suited than conventionally practiced single-plate fixation. Increased 3-dimensional stability, low morbidity and infection rates are the advantages offered by 2-plate technique of ours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cortelazzi R, Altacera M, Turco M, Antonicelli V, De Benedittis M (2015) Development and clinical evaluation of matrix MANDIBLE subcondylar plates system (synthes). Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr 8(2):94–99. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anirudhan A, Khalam SA, Zachariah RK (2013) Evaluation of clinical use of indigenously developed delta plate in management of subcondylar fracture. Clin Pract 3(2):e28. https://doi.org/10.4081/cp.2013.e28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaudhary M, Pant H, Singh M, Vashistha A, Kaur G (2015) Evaluation of trapezoidal-shaped 3-D plates for internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures in adults. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res 5(3):134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valiati R, Ibrahim D, Mer Abreu et al (2008) The treatment of condylar fractures: to open or not to open? A critical review of this controversy. Int J Med Sci 5(6):313–318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi K-Y, Yang J-D, Chung H-Y, Cho B-C (2012) Current concepts in the mandibular condyle fracture management part II: open reduction versus closed reduction. Arch Plast Surg 39(4):301–308. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Spinzia A, Patrone R, Belli E et al (2014) Open reduction and internal fixation of extracapsular mandibular condyle fractures: a long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of 25 patients. BMC Surg 14:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Parascandolo S, Spinzia A, Parascandolo S, Piombino P, Califano L (2010) Two load sharing plates fixation in mandibular condylar fractures: biomechanical basis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38(5):385–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi BH, Yi CK, Yoo JH (2001) Clinical evaluation of 3 types of plate osteosynthesis for fixation of condylar neck fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:734–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Costa FW, Bezerra MF, Ribeiro TR, Pouchain EC, VdeP Sabóia, Soares ECS (2012) Biomechanical analysis of titanium plate systems in mandibular condyle fractures: a systematized literature review. Acta Cir Bras 27(6):424–429. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502012000600011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biju Pappachan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standard.

Informed Consent

Informed consent from patient taken for study.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 48 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 215 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pappachan, B., Agrawal, R. Comparison of two L shaped Plate on Plate Versus Single Conventional L Miniplate in Fixation of Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 18, 440–446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1154-8

Keywords

Navigation