Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Serratiopeptidase After Surgical Removal of Impacted Molar: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Serratiopeptidase for pain, facial swelling and trismus associated with surgical removal of impacted molar is under investigation. However conclusive evidence on the use of serratiopeptidase is lacking. Hence a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies was carried out.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies and necessary data extracted. The data were analysed using non-Cochrane mode in RevMan 5.0. 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to represent the deviation from the point estimate. The heterogeneity between the studies was assessed using Forest plot visually, I2 statistics and Chi square test with a statistical P value of <0.10 to indicate statistical significance. Random-effect models were used in case of moderate to severe heterogeneity.

Results

Five studies were included for final review. Serratiopeptidase improved trismus better than corticosteroids with the MD, 95% as 4.42 [3.84, 5]. As regards to swelling, no significant difference was observed for serratiopeptidase when compared to corticosteroids. Paucity of studies precludes any conclusion for other outcome measures as well as for other comparator drugs.

Conclusion

Serratiopeptidase could be used safely and effectively to improve trismus and facial swelling after surgical removal of impacted molar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joshi KK, Nerurkar RP (2012) Anti-inflammatory effect of the serratiopeptidase–rationale or fashionable: a study in rat paw oedema model induced by the carrageenan. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 56:367–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Selan L, Papa R, Tilotta M et al (2015) Serratiopeptidase: a well-known metalloprotease with a new non-proteolytic activity against S. aureus biofilm. BMC Microbiol 15:207. doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0548-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Seymour RA, Blair GS, Wyatt FA (1983) Post-operative dental pain and analgesic efficacy. Part I. Br J Oral Surg 21:290–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sannino G, Gigola P, Puttini M et al (2013) Combination therapy including serratiopeptidase improves outcomes of mechanical-antibiotic treatment of periimplantitis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 26:825–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Passariello C, Lucchese A, Pera F (2012) Clinical, microbiological and inflammatory evidence of the efficacy of combination therapy including serratiopeptidase in the treatment of periimplantitis. Eur J Inflamm 10:463–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kastury N, Singh S, Ansari KU (1999) An audit of prescription for rational use of fixed dose drug combinations. Indian J Pharmacol 31:367

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mead SV (1930) Incidence of impacted teeth. Int J Orthodo Oral Surg Radiog 16:885–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grover PS, Lorton L (1985) The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59:420–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW (1986) Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(11):855–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher SE, Frame JW, Rout PJ et al (1988) Factors affecting the onset and severity of pain following the surgical removal of unilateral impacted mandibular third molar teeth. Br Dent J 164:351–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merten HA, Muller K, Drubel F et al (1991) Volumetric verification of edema protection with serrapeptase after third molar osteotomy. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 15:302–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhagat S, Agarwal M, Roy V (2013) Serratiopeptidase: a systematic review of the existing evidence. Int J Surg 11:209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 5.1.0 edn. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed on 15 Oct 2015

  14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chopra D, Rehan HS, Mehra P et al (2009) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of paracetamol, serratiopeptidase, ibuprofen and betamethasone using the dental impaction pain model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:350–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Khateeb TH, Nusair Y (2008) Effect of the proteolytic enzyme serrapeptase on swelling, pain and trismus after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:264–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murugesan K, Sreekumar K, Sabapathy B (2012) Comparison of the roles of serratiopeptidase and dexamethasone in the control of inflammation and trismus following impacted third molar surgery. Indian J Dent Res 23:709–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chappi DM, Suresh KV, Patil MR et al (2015) Comparison of clinical efficacy of methylprednisolone and serratiopeptidase for reduction of postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery. J Clin Exp Dent 7:e197–e202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kannan R, Kavitha R (2015) A comparative study of anti-inflammatory properties of bromelain/serratiopeptidase as an add on therapy to conventional treatment following impacted third molar surgery. World J Pharm Res 4:2595–2607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Woodley JF (1994) Enzymatic barriers for GI peptide and protein delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 11:61–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein G, Kullich W (2000) Short-term treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee with oral enzymes. A randomized, double-blind study versus diclofenac. Clin Drug Invest 19:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasaki S, Kawanami R, Motizuki Y et al (2000) Serrapeptase-induced lung injury manifesting as acute eosiniphilic pneumonia. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 38:540–544 (Japanese)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazzone A, Catalani M, Costanzo M et al (1990) Evaluation of Serratia-peptidase in acute or chronic inflammation of otorhinolaryngology pathology: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial versus placebo. J Int Med Res 18:379–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Cochrane reviews for utilizing RevMan software for generating the pooled results and Forest plots.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gowri Sivaramakrishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivaramakrishnan, G., Sridharan, K. Role of Serratiopeptidase After Surgical Removal of Impacted Molar: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 17, 122–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-0996-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-0996-9

Keywords

Navigation