Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating and comparing the two superstorms in the 23rd solar cycle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated two super geomagnetic storms (GSs) that occurred on November 20, 2003 (Dst = –422 nT), and November 08, 2004 (Dst = –374 nT). The investigation was conducted by the zonal geomagnetic indices (ZGi) and the solar wind parameters (SWp) (nT). The analysis of the two super geomagnetic activities based on the artificial neural network model (ANNm) consists of the correlation matrix, the hierarchical cluster appearance, and the ZGi estimation with their errors. In the light of physical principles, the ANNm utilizes SWp as inputs and ZGi as outputs. The comparative estimation conclusions with a high correlation rate and low absolute error are satisfied. The ANNm performance is evaluated using the correlation constant (R) and root mean square error (RMSE) (nT) measures for either GS. The study claims that the network model is reliable, with an R-value of up to 88% and an RMSE value of down to 4.78 nT. The paper may support the Sun–Earth investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S I Akasofu Planet Space Sci. 12 273 (1964)

  2. R K Burton J. Geophys. Res. 80 4204 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G Rostoker, E Friedrich and M Dobbs Geophys. Monogr. Ser. Washington DC, AGU In: B T Tsurutani, W D Gonzalez, Y Kamide and J K Arballo (eds) 98 149 (1997)

  4. B T Tsurutani et al Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 03 (2005)

  5. B T Tsurutani, O P Verkhoglyadova, A J Mannucci, G S Lakhina, G Li and G P Zank Radio Sci. 44 RS0A17 (2009)

  6. G S Lakhina, S Alex, B T Tsurutani and W D Gonzalez Extreme Events and Natural Hazards: The Complexity Perspective Washington DC AGU In: A S Sharma, A Bunde, V P Dimri and D N Baker (eds), Geophys. Mon. Ser. 196 267 (2012)

  7. B Rathore J. Geosci. 5 1602 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. E Eroglu New Astronomy 60 33 (2018)

  9. E Eroglu Earth Planets Sp. 71 26 (2019)

  10. E Eroglu Adv. Space Res. 68 2272 (2021a)

  11. S Chakraborty and S K Morley J. Space Weather Space Clim. 10 36 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K Koklu Adv. Space Res. 66 932 (2020)

  13. S K Sharma and A K Singh Astrophys Space Sci. 365 35 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S Inyurt Adv. Space Res. 65 966 (2020a)

  15. S Bruinsma and C Boniface J. Space Weather Space Clim. 11 12 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Inyurt Geomagn. Aeron. 60 131 (2020b)

  17. K Köklü Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021 9948745 (2021)

  18. F Bascıftcı Geomagn. Aeron. 61 S156 (2021)

  19. E N Parker Astrophysical Journal 128 664 (1958)

  20. G E Brueckner et al. Res. Lett. 25 3019 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K Shibata et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 451 (1995)

  22. K Shibata and T Magara Sol. Phys. 8 6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. H S Fu, Y V Khotyaintsev, A Vaivads, A Retinò and André M Nature Physics 9 426 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H S Fu, A Vaivads, Y V Khotyaintsev, M André, J B Cao and V J Olshevsky Res. Lett. 44 37 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S Pande M C Mathpal and B Pande IARJSET 4 5 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M V Klimenko et al. J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phys. 180 78 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. D L Turner et al. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124 1013 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. L Qian, W Wang, A G Burns, P C Chamberlin and A Coster J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124 2298 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M Piersanti et al. Geophys. 38 703 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. S Inyurt M Hasanpour Kashani and A Sekertekin Astrophys Space Sci. 365 1 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T Murayama Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20 623 (1982)

  32. D Zhao, Z Huang and N Umino Res. Lett. 38 L10302 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. B O Adebesin and S O Ikubanni Phys. 8 119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. P Zuo, X Feng, Y Xie, Y Wang and X Xu Astrophys. J. 808 83 (2015)

  35. B O Adebesin Acta Geod. Geophys. 51 315 (2016)

  36. J E Borovsky and K Yakymenko J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics 122 2973 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. H Gleisner Geophys. 14 679 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  38. F Boberg, P Wintoft and H Lundstedt Phys. Chem. Earth, Part C: Solar Terr. Planet. Sci. 25 275 (2000)

  39. H Gleisner and H Lundstedt J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 106 24541 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. P N Mayaud Derivation, Meaning and Use of Geomagnetic Indices Washington DC, AGU Geophysical Monograph Series 22 (1980)

  41. Y Kamide, N Yokoyama, W Gonzalez, B T Tsurutani and I A Daglis J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 103 6917 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. A Hanslmeier The Sun and Space Weather Astrophysics and Space Science, second ed. (Springer e-book) (2007)

  43. J L Elman Cognitive Science 14 179 (1990)

  44. H Lundstedt Planet Space Science 40 457 (1992)

  45. H Lundstedt and P Wintoft Ann. Geophys. 12 19 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. W S Sarle Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, April (1994)

  47. M W Gardner and S R Dorling Atmospheric Environment 32 2627 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. F R Fenrich and J G Luhmann Geophys. Res. Lett. 25 2999 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. T P O’Brien and R L McPherron J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 62 1295 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. D Altadill, E M Apostolov, J G Sole and C H Jacobi Phys. Chem. Earth, Part C: Solar Terr. Planet. Sci. 26 387 (2001)

  51. H Lundstedt Res. Lett. 29 34 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Z H Zhou J Wu and W Tang Artificial Intelligence 137 239 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. H Lundstedt Geophys. 23 1505 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  54. G Pallocchia, E Amata and G Consolini Geophys. 24 989 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  55. J Uwamahoro, L A McKinnell and J B Habarulema Ann. Geophys. 30 963 (2012)

  56. R Bala and P Reiff Space Weather 10 S06001 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. G Singh and A K Singh J. Earth Syst. Sci. 125 899 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. S Inyurt and A Sekertekin Astrophys Space Sci. 364 62 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. D E Rumelhart G E Hinton and R J Williams Nature 323 533 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  60. E Eroglu, N Ak, K Koklu and Z Ozdemir Sci. Tech. 30 719 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  61. O Isik Z F Kocak and E Eroglu Applications & Applied Mathematics 9 637 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  62. E Eroglu and O Isik European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 9 360 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. E Eroglu Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 5 33 (2020)

  64. L V Fausett Fundamentals of Neural Networks Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 437 (1994)

  65. T M Peng N F Hubele and G G Karady IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 7 250 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. A G El-Din and D W Smith Water Research 36 1115 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. R P Lippmann ASSP Magazine IEEE 4 4 (1987)

  68. S Haykin Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation Macmillan College Publ. Comp., Inc. New York (1994)

  69. H S Stern Technometrics 38 205 (1996)

  70. N Balan, Y Ebihara, R Skoug, K Shiokawa and I S Batista J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics 122 2824 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. S Wing et al. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110 (2005)

  72. E J Young, Y J Moon and J Park J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118 5109 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. J R A Solares, H L Wei and R J Boynton S N Walker and S A Billings Space Weather 14 899 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. P Wintoft and M Wik J. Space Weather Space Clim. 7 A29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. J Takalo and J Timonen Geophys. Res. Lett. 24 2403 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. C A Gontarski and P R Rodrigues M Mori and L F Prenem Computers & Chemical Engineering 24 1719 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. B T Tsurutani et al. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 111 A07S01 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  78. W D Gonzalez, B T Tsurutani, A L C Gonzalez and E J Smith J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics 94 8835 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. J E Borovsky J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics 117 A05104 (2012)

  80. J E Borovsky and K Yakymenko J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics 122 10012 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. E Eroglu Arab. J. Geosci. 14 2538 (2021b)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge thanks to NASA and Kyoto University.

Funding

The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuat Basciftci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basciftci, F. Investigating and comparing the two superstorms in the 23rd solar cycle. Indian J Phys 96, 2707–2716 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-022-02396-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-022-02396-y

Keywords

Navigation