Abstract
Contemporary India is part of a global community where modernization and urbanization including consumerism is on the rise; but not leaving behind its historic cultural essence. Old scriptures, myths, folklore, literature, cultural proverbs as well as media, have a noteworthy role in shaping the perspectives of Indian people. The current study was done in parts of urban Bengal to explore the influence of these forces from socio-political, psychological as well as philosophical registers, in shaping the self-image and identity of contemporary women. 50 participants were interviewed using a semi-structured in-depth interview method and data were analyzed following qualitative analytical methods keeping the cultural-relational-social context in perspective. The method of pluralism in the qualitative analysis was followed using three data analysis methods—Grounded Theory, Interpretative Phenomenological Approach, and Narrative Analysis. Analyses revealed an intriguing social-crafting of the concepts of gender and identities of women through idealization and internalization of traits and notions incessantly presented through celebrated literature, myths, folklore, proverbs, and media. Furthermore, the analysis showed how the deep-rooted paradox, inherent in Bengal’s cultural discourse, is internalized even by educated urban women and infuses a sense of lack, vulnerability, self-loathing, blame, and stigma in their identity. On the contrary, it was also observed in a few instances that optimum use of media and global knowledge led to the construction of a new-age ‘individual’ and ‘subjective’ discourse.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
New-age poet from Bengal, known for questioning social structure and indicating at systemic oppression.
Feminist poet from Bengal.
Film director from Bengal with International fame—known for making non-binary gender concepts frequent representations in Bengali movies.
Protagonist of ‘Chokher Bali’ novel of tagore—self-willed, outspoken widow character.
Prafulla—protagonist of ‘Debi Chaudhurani’ novel of Bankim Chandra—escaped housewife turned dacoit-head—Indian version of Robinhood.
Protagonist of ‘Ghare Baire’ novel of Tagore—got romantically involved with husband’s friend—was not happy with apparent successful marriage.
Protagonist of ‘Chokher Bali’ novel of tagore—prototype submissive housewife—was presented in contrast to Binodini—accepted husband after his illicit romantic affair outside marriage.
Protagonist detective character in writings of Satyajit Ray—intelligent, smart prototype of educated Bengalee men—remained single to avoid distractions in life.
Protagonist in Shivpurana and Manasamangal folk-tales—the archetypal wife image who brought her husband back to life from death, by travelling to yamaloka alive and convincing Yama.
Goddess and negative protagonist in Manasamangal—self-willed female-god, wronged by father and step-mother—killed Lakkhindar (husband of Behula) to force his father in becoming a disciple of her.
All these authors are known for writing rebellious texts for women, questioning the years old societal structure and systemic oppression.
Famous bengali poet known for questioning societal structure as well as role of media.
Film director from bengal—disciple of Rituporno ghosh—famous for unveiling systemic oppression through his movies.
IPS officer from Bengal—fought contemporary political conspiracy to unveil truth about park street rape case of 2012.
References
Basu, S. (2004). Describing the body: The writing of sex and gender identity for the contemporary Bengali woman. In J. H. Mills & S. Sen (Eds.), Confronting the body: The politics of physicality in colonial and post-colonial India (pp. 146–161). Wimbledon publishing company.
Chakraborty, R., & De, S. (2019). Be(com)ing a woman: Body, authority and society. Psychology & Developing Societies, 31(2), 283–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333619863236
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Sage.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
Covino, D. C. (2004). Amending the abject body: Aesthetic makeovers in medicine and culture. SUNY Press.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications.
Daniel, V. (2003). Kurt Lewin notes. Retrieved from Sonoma State University Website: http://www.sonoma.edu/users/d/daniels/lewinnotes.html
Dave, P. (2012). Societal attitudes and gender bias as reflected in the language of matrimonial advertisements. Language in India., 12(3), 261–275.
Derrida, J. (1987). The truth in painting (G. Bennington & I. Mcleod Tans.). University of Chicago Press.
Desai, M. (2016). Gendered violence and India’s body politic. New Left Review, 99, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.12375
Elson, J. (2004). Am I still a woman? Hysterectomy and gender identity. Temple University Press.
Emerson, P., & Frosh, S. (2004). Critical narrative analysis in psychology: A guide to practice. Palgrave.
Falk, P. (1994). The consuming body. Sage Publications.
Foster, P. (1995). Minding the body. New York, NY: Anchor.
Foucault, M. (1990). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality (R. Hurley Trans.), (Vol.1). Penguin Books Ltd.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Frost, N. A. (2006). Taking the other out of mother: The transition to second-time motherhood (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Birkbeck college.
Frost, N. A. (2009). Do you know what I mean? The use of a pluralistic narrative analysis in the interpretation of an interview. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108094867
Frost, N., Nolas, S. M., Gordon, B. B., Esin, C., Holt, A., Mehdizadeh, L., & Shinebourne, P. (2010). Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research, 10(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366802
Ghosal, S., Jana, S., Mani, A., Mitra, S., & Roy, S. (2020). Sex workers, stigma and self-image: Evidence from Kolkata Brothels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–45. Sex Workers, Stigma and Self-Image: Evidence from Kolkata Brothels | The Review of Economics and Statistics | MIT Press.
Gill, R., & Elias, A. S. (2014). ‘Awaken your incredible’: Love your body discourses and postfeminist contradictions. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 10(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.10.2.179_1
Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460
Grogan, S. (1999). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children. Routledge.
Grosz, E. A. (1995). Space, time & perversion: Essays on the politics of bodies. Routledge.
Halder, S., & Mondal, P. (2020). Body image and the preference of exercise in everyday life: A study on young generation. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 25(11), 12–16.
Hart, K., & Kenny, M. E. (1997). Adherence to the super woman ideal and eating disorder symptoms among college women. Sex Roles, 36, 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766684
Jackson, L. A. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. State University of New York Press.
Jerslev, A. (2008). Cosmetic surgery and mediated body theatre: The designable body in the makeover programme The Swan. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 6(3), 323–341.
Johnson, B. R. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(3), 282–292.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (L. S. Roudiez Trans.). Columbia University Press.
Lebesco, K. (2004). Revolting bodies? The struggle to redefine fat identity. University of Massachusetts Press.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Lingis, A. (1994). Foreign bodies. Routledge.
Loseke, D. (2007). The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organization and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integrations. The Sociological Quarterly, 48, 661–688.
McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558
McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and Daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.760
McKinley, N. M. (2006). Longitudinal gender differences in objectified body consciousness and weight-related attitudes and behaviors: Cultural and developmental contexts in the transition from college. Sex Roles, 54, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9335-1
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
Mensinger, J. L., Bonifazi, D., & LaRosa, J. (2007). Perceived gender role prescriptions in schools, the superwoman ideal, and disordered eating among adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 57, 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9281-6
Moinuddin, S. (2010). Media space and gender construction. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Newell, P. (2002). Echo of the soul: The sacredness of the human body. Morehouse.
Oberoi, S. S. (2015). Updating income ranges for kuppuswamy’s socio-economic status scale for the year 2014. Indian Journal of Public Health, 59(2), 156–157.
Oldfield, S., Salo, E., & Schlyter, A. (2009). Body politics and citizenship. Feminist Africa, 13, December. ISSN 1726–4596. http://agi.ac.za/sites/agi.ac.za/files/fa13_entire_journal.pdf
Parikh, I., & Garg, P. K. (1989). Indian women: An inner dialogue. Sage.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publication.
Priya, K. R. (2010). The research relationship as a facilitator of remoralization and self-growth: Postearthquake suffering and healing. Qualitative Health Research, 20(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309360419
Riessman, C. K. (2011). What’s different about narrative inquiry? Cases, categories and contexts. Qualitative Research, 3, 310–330.
Sarkar, S. (2017). Security and agency of women in the hyper-masculine space of local trains in West Bengal. Kairos A Journal of Critical Symposium, 2(1), 100–108.
Scheper-hughes, N., & Wacquant, L. (2003). Commodifying bodies. Sage Publications.
Schlyter, A., Chipeta, L.K., Dellenborg, L., Diallo, A., Espling, M., Lewis, D.,… Mahlck, P. (2009). Body politics and women citizens: African experiences. Sida studies, 24. Africa: Sida. ISBN 978-91-586-4100-6, ISSN 1404-9562.
Shammas, B. (Feb, 11, 2020). This ad is a raw look at postpartum life. The Oscars rejected it for being too graphic. The Washington Post. Accessed on 29th June, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2020/02/10/oscars-rejected-postpartum-ad/
Sihe, M. S. (2020). Female materialization: Separating “Sex” from the“Object.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 9(4), 35–43.
Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories & mathods (pp. 218–240). Sage Publications.
Stratton, J. (2001). The desirable body: Cultural fetishism and the erotics of consumption. University of Illinois Press.
Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Franko, D. L. (2002). Body image issues among girls and women. In T. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 183–191). Guilford Press.
Sque, M. (2000). Researching the bereaved: An investigator‟s experience. Nursing Ethics, 7, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973300000700105
Tebbel, C. (2003). The body snatchers: How the media shapes women. Lane Cove, Sydney: Finch.
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430
Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 31, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532
Waskul, D., & Vannini, P. (2006). Body/Embodiment: Symbolic interaction and the sociology of the body. Ashgate.
Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Sage Publications.
Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article, from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborty, R., De, S. Camouflaged Protocols of Womanhood: Inherent Paradoxes of Bengal. Psychol Stud 67, 488–500 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00687-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00687-2