Abstract
This study attempts to understand the gender positions taken up by men and women with regard to desire, pleasure, and power in heterosexual relationships. This would require an insight into the developing sexual selves of the participants. Using the qualitative technique of discourse analysis, the focus was to cultivate an image of the sexual life of these young people such that one is able to see how the elements in the construction of their sexuality have coalesced resulting in the current positions. It became evident through an analysis of the narratives that women were very much aware of and exposed to the notions of desire and pleasure, and thought about their sexual nature and needs. They had no qualms in admitting and accepting the same. Among the men, it was seen that men were not uni-dimensional, single-minded and self-centred with regard to sex. Intimacy and emotionality were very much part of their sexual repertoire. With regard to the construct of power, it is evident from the narratives that there is a power dynamic at play where sexual experience could become a function of a feeling of superiority in heterosexual relationships. A power dynamic appears to exist between the forces of self and society as well and seems to be skewed in the favour of men. Thus, the focus here has not been to complete the jigsaw but to understand how these pieces have come to be a part of this puzzle, being completely aware that the results would only be an entry point into understanding how these complex structures develop.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birnbaum, G. (2017). The fragile spell of desire: A functional perspective on changes in sexual desire across relationship development. Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317715350.
Chopra, T., & Vatsayana, (2007). Kamasutra. New Delhi: Prakash Books India.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Dieronitou, I. (2014). The ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(10), 1–17.
Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–54.
Gavey, N. (1997). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. In M. Gergen & S. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender: A reader (pp. 49–64). New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Henriques, J., & Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques (Ed.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
Kakar, S. (1989). Intimate relations: Exploring Indian sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kakar, S. (2012). The inner world a psychoanalytic study of childhood and society in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Kitzinger, C., & Wilkinson, S. (1995). Feminist discourses and women’s heterosexual desire. Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 86–142). London: Sage.
Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), 823–856.
Murray, S. H., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012). Sexual desire and relationship duration in young men and women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 38(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2011.569637.
Regan, P. C., & Atkins, L. (2006). Sex differences and similarities in frequency and intensity of sexual desire. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.1.95.
Tolman, D. (2005). I. Found(ing) discourses of desire: Unfettering female adolescent sexuality. Feminism and Psychology, 15(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353505049696.
Tolman, D., Spencer, R., Harmon, T., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Striepe, M. (2004). Getting close, staying cool: Early adolescent boys’ experiences with romantic relationships. In M. Kimmel, N. Way, & J. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 235–255). New York: NYU Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chandra, P., Sharma, A. Subjectifying Construction: Situating Desire, Pleasure and Power in Heterosexual Relationships. Psychol Stud 64, 49–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0473-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0473-7