Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Self-Construals and Interactive Constraints on Consumer Complaint Behaviors Across Cultures

  • Target Article (with peer commentary)
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study predicts cross-cultural associations between task and face constraints in relation to consumer complaint behaviors. Participants comprised 1200 undergraduates from Kyoto City in Japan and 420 undergraduates from Las Vegas and Tennessee in the USA. The complaint methods studied include direct voice responses, private responses (negative word of mouth and exit action), and third-party responses. We found that complaints are usually made when service failures occur at the level of co-consumption, rather than at the level of the unaccompanied consumer. The results elucidate intrapersonal and interpersonal views regarding the role played by task constraints and face constraints in mediating the relationship between independent and interdependent self-construals and complaints expressed in various ways. Discussion of these results and their implications is provided, followed by suggestions for future research on culture and conversational constraints (task and face constraints), which leads to complaint behavior, and implications of such research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S., Pearo, L. K., & Widener, S. K. (2008). Drivers of service satisfaction—Linking customer satisfaction to the service concept customer characteristics. Journal of Service Research, 10, 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). AMOS (Version 7.0) [computer program]. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H., & Wan, L. C. (2008). Consumer responses to service failures: A resource reference model of cultural influences. Journal of International Marketing, 16, 72–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Romá, V., & Hernández, A. (2006). Power and Type I error of the mean and covariance structure analysis model for detecting differential item functioning in graded response items. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 29–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gump, B. B., & Kulik, J. A. (1997). Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 305–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and Social Behavior (pp. 151–177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more invulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1268–1283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1999). Culture, self-discrepancies, and self-satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 915–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. L., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2007). Interactional service failures in a pseudorelationship: the role of organizational attributions. Journal of Retailing, 83, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. J., & Gengler, C. (2001). Emotional contagion effects on product attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.-H., & Chang, C.-C. (2008). The role of personality traits in online consumer complaint behavior and service recovery expectation. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 1223–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of the perceived importance of conversational constraints. Human Communication Research, 21, 128–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (2002). Non-western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, A., & Horpestad, S. (2009). Self-construal in chile and norway implications for cultural differences in individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and con-sequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T., & Kim, M. S. (1997). A revised self-construal scale. Honolulu: Department of Speech, University of Hawaii at Manoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (2000). On the comparability of constructs in cross-cultural research: A critique of Cheung and Rensvold. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. R., & McClure, P. (2001). Recognizing cross-cultural differences in consumer com-plaint behavior and intentions: An empirical examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyer, P. U., & Gopinath, M. (2005). Effects of complaining versus negative word of mouth on subsequent changes in satisfaction, the role of public commitment. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 937–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, S., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Consuming with others: social influences on moment-to-moment and retrospective evaluations of an experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 506–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1988). Consumer complaint intentions and behavior-definitional and taxo-nomical issues. Journal of Marketing, 52, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 356–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel, A., Kilinc, U. K., & Yuksel, F. (2006). Cross-national analysis of hotel customers’ attitudes toward complaining and their complaining behaviors. Tourism Management, 27, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. L., & Shrum, L. J. (2009). The influence of self-construal on impulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 838–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayano Yamaguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, A., Kim, MS. & Akutsu, S. The Effects of Self-Construals and Interactive Constraints on Consumer Complaint Behaviors Across Cultures. Psychol Stud 61, 267–278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0371-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0371-9

Keywords

Navigation