Skip to main content
Log in

Ethanol and Acetone Gas Sensor Properties of Porous Silicon Based on Resistance Response

  • Research
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on importance of porous silicon in nearly all physical and chemical properties such as mechanical, electrical, and optical on one hand and its application in optoelectronic devices on the other hand, we decided to plan and construction a setup to receive a proper porous silicon in the case of uniformity in diameter and depth of pores which was confirmed by FESEM measurements. Using AFM images, topography parameters and fractal dimensions were calculated and compared. Optical band gap of silicon and porous silicon was compared. The prepared samples were applied to use as a gas sensor to exposure of ethanol and acetone vapors from 100 to 400 ppm. Interesting results of application of fabricated samples has been reported in result section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Uhlir A (1956) Bell Syst Tech J 35:333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fakiri S, Montagne A, Rahmoun K, Iost A, Ziouche K (2018) Mater Sci Eng A 711:470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lachenani H, Larabi A, Gabouze N (2019) SILICON 11:2505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan KS, Dwight TJE (2018) Results Phys 10:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hajilari F, Farhadi K, Eskandari H, Allahnouri F (2020) Electrochim Acta 355:136751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Praveenkumar S, Lingaraja D, MahizMathi P, Dinesh Ram G (2019) Optik (Stuttg) 178:216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Massoudi A, Azim-Araghi ME, Keihan M (2015) Asl Adv. Ceram Prog 1:24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Black CT, Guarini KW, Breyta G, Colburn MC, Ruiz R, Sandstrom RL, Sikorski EM, Zhang Y (2006) J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanom Struct 24:3188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Föll H, Christophersen M, Carstensen J, Hasse G (2002) Mater Sci Eng R Reports 39:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Russo L, Colangelo F, Cioffi R, Rea I, De Stefano L (2011) Materials (Basel) 4:1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahar M, Gholami M, Azim-Araghi ME (2014) Mater Sci Semicond Process 26:491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gole JL and Lewis SE (2008) Porous silicon–sensors and future applications. In Nanosilicon (pp 149–175). Elsevier.

  13. Sailor MJ (2012) Porous silicon in practice—preparation, characterization and applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, DE.

  14. Levitsky IA (2015) Sensors (Switzerland) 15:19968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dwivedi SBP (2023) IEEE Sensors J 23:3. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3223102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dwivedi P, Das S, Dhanekar S, Appl ACS (2017) Mater Interfaces 9(24):21017–21024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dwivedi P, Neha Chauhan P, Vivekanandan SD, Sakthi Kumar D, Dhanekar S (2017) Sensors Actuators B Chem 249:602–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dwivedi P et al (2018) Nanotechnology 29:275503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Banerjee D et al (2020) Eng Res Express 2:035021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Salih E, Ayesh AI (2020) Phys E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostructures 123:114220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Cheng S, Liu H, Hu S, Zhang D, Ning H (2012) Sensors (Switzerland) 12:9635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghaderi A, Shafiekhani A, Solaymani S, Ţălu Ş, Duarte H, da Fonseca Filho NS, Ferreira RS, Matos HZ, Dejam L (2022) Sci Rep 12(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramírez-González F, García-Salgado G, Rosendo E, Díaz T, Nieto-Caballero F, Coyopol A, Romano R, Luna A, Monfil K, Gastellou E (2020) Sensors (Switzerland) 20:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gosteva EA, Rubtsova KI, Silina MD, Starkov VV (2020) Mech Solids 55:103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas T, Kumar Y, Ramos Ramón JA, Agarwal V, Sepúlveda Guzmán S, Pushpan RRS, Loredo SL, and Sanal KC (2021) Porous silicon/α-MoO3 nanohybrid based fast and highly sensitive CO2 gas sensors. Vacuum 184:109983

  26. Choi MS, Na HG, Mirzaei A, Bang JH, Oum W, Han S, Choi SW, Kim M, Jin C, Kim SS, and Kim HW (2019) Roomtemperature NO2 sensor based on electrochemically etched porous silicon. J Alloys Compd 811:151975

  27. Wang J, Zhou Q, Peng S, Xu L, Zeng W (2020) Front Chem 8:339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Naderi N, Hashim MR, Amran TST (2012) Superlattices Microstruct 51:626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li C et al (2022) Sensors and Actuators: B. Chemical 367:132143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harraz FA et al (2020) Arab J Chem 13:444–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Riyazi S, Azim Araghi ME (2020) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 31:3539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nečas D, Klapetek P (2012) Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis. Cent Eur J Phys 10(1):181–188

  33. ISO 25178–2: 2012, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Areal - Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Emad Moghimi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft. Mohammad Esmaeil Azim Araghi: Data curation, Investigation, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emad Moghimi.

Ethics declarations

Financial Interests

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

The amplitude parameters of 3-D surface roughness, according with ISO 25178–2:2012 are defined as follows:

  • (Sa): Arithmetical mean height is the mean surface roughness.

  • (Sq): Root mean square height is the standard deviation of the height distribution, or RMS surface roughness.

  • (Ssk): Skewness is the third statistical moment, quantifying the symmetry of the height distribution. Negative skew indicates a predominance of valleys, while positive skew is seen on surfaces with peaks.

  • (Sku): Kurtosis is the fourth statistical moment, quantifying the flatness of the height distribution. For spiky surfaces, Sku > 3; for bumpy surfaces, Sku < 3; perfectly random surfaces have kurtosis of 3.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moghimi, E., Azim Araghi, M.E. Ethanol and Acetone Gas Sensor Properties of Porous Silicon Based on Resistance Response. Silicon 15, 5821–5827 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02607-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02607-z

Keywords

Navigation