Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Thermophysical and Physicochemical Characteristics of Al2O3-SiO2- CaO - Na3AlF6 Flux for SMAW Electrode Coating

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the thermophysical, physicochemical, and electrical characteristics of electrode coatings developed for application in the weld joint of nuclear power plants (NPPs). The extreme vertices design technique has been used in this work to develop the Al2O3-SiO2-CaO-Na3AlF6-based Shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) electrodes. Twenty-six electrode coating compositions were formulated, and flux coatings were milled into a fine powder for further characterization. X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was utilized to investigate the structure and phases of the coating composition, and the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis technique was employed to determine the nature of bonds. The coating's thermal characteristics, including conductivity, diffusivity, and specific heat, were evaluated using hot disk equipment. Enthalpy change and thermal stability of flux coating were determined using the Differential thermal analysis(DTA)/ differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) technique.. The precision inductance (L), capacitance (C), and resistance (R) (LCR) instrument was used further to examine the electrical characteristics of the flux coatings. In addition, a regression model has been developed for each coating property using statistical analysis and investigated a correlation between the properties and mineral interactions. Results reveal that the individual elements and their binary and tertiary interaction significantly influence the physicochemical, thermophysical, and electrical properties of the flux coatings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

I, alok gupta, certified that data & material would be available on the author’s request.

References

  1. Fernández-Arias P, Vergara D, Orosa JA (2020) A global review of PWR nuclear power plants. Appl Sci 10:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Raghuvanshi SP, Chandra A, Raghav AK (2006) Carbon dioxide emissions from coal based power generation in India. Energy Convers Manag 47:427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.05.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Mulali U (2014) Investigating the impact of nuclear energy consumption on GDP growth and CO2 emission: a panel data analysis. Prog Nucl Energy 73:172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adamantiades A, Kessides I (2009) Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 37:5149–5166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jimenez G, Flores JM (2014) Reducing the CO2 emissions and the energy dependence of a large city area with zero-emission vehicles and nuclear energy. Prog Nucl Energy 78:396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.03.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Danish, Ozcan B, Ulucak R (2021) An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses. Nucl Eng Technol 53:20562065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008

  7. Hassan ST, Danish, Khan S-U-D et al (2020) Is nuclear energy a better alternative for mitigating CO2 emissions in BRICS countries? An empirical analysis. Nucl Eng Technol 52:2969–2974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.05.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saidi K, Omri A (2020) Reducing CO2 emissions in OECD countries: do renewable and nuclear energy matter? Prog Nucl Energy 126:103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akhmat G, Zaman K, Shukui T et al (2014) The challenges of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution through energy sources: Evidence from a panel of developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:7425–7435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2693-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiore K (2006) Nuclear energy and sustainability: understanding ITER. Energy Policy 34:3334–3341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahajan S, Chhibber R (2020) Investigations on dissimilar welding of P91/SS304L using Nickel-based electrodes. Mater Manuf Process 35:1010–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1755041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chhibber R, Arora N, Gupta SR, Dutta BK (2006) Use of bimetallic welds in nuclear reactors: associated problems and structural integrity assessment issues. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 220:1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor N, Faidy C, Gilles P (2006) Assessment of dissimilar weld integrity: final report of the NESC-III Project. Network for Evaluating Structural Components, Institute for Energy, Petten, The Netherlands, Report No. EUR, 22510

  14. Rathod DW, Pandey S, Aravindan S, Singh PK (2016) Diffusion control and metallurgical behavior of successive buttering on SA508 steel using Ni–Fe alloy and inconel 182. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 5:450–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-016-0311-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rathod DW, Pandey S, Singh PK, Prasad R (2015) Experimental analysis of dissimilar metal weld joint: ferritic to austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 639:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rathod DW, Sharma SK, Pandey S (2021) Hot cracking susceptibility: an effect of solidification modes of SS consumables during bimetallic welds. Springer, Singapore, pp 537–547

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dak G, Pandey C (2020) A critical review on dissimilar welds joint between martensitic and austenitic steel for power plant application. J Manuf Process 58:377–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurya AK, Pandey C, Chhibber R (2021) Dissimilar welding of duplex stainless steel with Ni alloys: a review. Int J Press Vessel Pip 192:104439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JW, Lee K, Kim JS, Byun TS (2009) Local mechanical properties of Alloy 82/182 dissimilar weld joint between SA508 Gr.1a and F316 SS at RT and 320 °C. J Nucl Mater 384:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim M-C, Park S-G, Lee K, Lee B-S (2014) Comparison on Mechanical Properties of SA508 Gr.3 Cl.1, Cl.2, and Gr.4N Low Alloy Steels for Pressure Vessels. Trans Korean Nucl Soc 30–31

  21. Ravikiran K, Das G, Kumar S et al (2019) Narrow gap welding of low alloy and austenitic stainless steels using different Inconel alloys: comparison of microstructure and properties. Mater Res Express 6:096518. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab2be2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ravikiran K, Das G, Kumar S et al (2019) Evaluation of microstructure at interfaces of welded joint between low alloy steel and stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 50:2784–2797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05192-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan WN, Chhibber R (2020) Physicochemical and thermo physical characterization of CaO–CaF2–SiO2 and CaO–TiO2–SiO2 based electrode coating for offshore welds. Ceram Int 46:8601–8614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahajan S, Chhibber R (2019) Design and development of shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) electrode coatings using a CaO-CaF2-SiO2 and CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 flux system. JOM 71:2435–2444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03494-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhandari D, Chhibber R, Arora N, Mehta R (2019) Investigations on weld metal chemistry and mechanical behaviour of bimetallic welds using CaO–CaF2–SiO2–Ni based electrode coatings. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 233:563–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420716677316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang H, Qin R, He G (2016) SiO2 and CaF2 behavior during shielded metal arc welding and their effect on slag detachability of the CaO-CaF2-SiO2 type ENiCrFe-7-covered electrode. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 47:4530–4542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3629-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eagar TW (1978) Sources of weld metal oxygen contamination during submerged arc welding. Weld J 57(3)

  28. Kim JH, Frost RH, Olson DL, Blander M (1987) Effect of electrochemical reactions on submerged arc weld metal composition. 224–225

  29. Sharma L, Chhibber R (2020) Investigations of thermophysical properties of submerged arc welding slag using a rutile-acidic flux system. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 31:322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar V, Kumar J, Chhibber R, Sharma L (2022) Experimental study on wettability at high-temperature using TiO2-SiO2-CaO-Na3AlF6 based electrode coating for AUSC thermal power plant. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01824-2

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan WN, Chhibber R (2021) Investigations on effect of CaO-CaF2-TiO2-SiO2 based electrode coating constituents and their interactions on weld chemistry. Ceram Int 47:12483–12493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahajan S, Chhibber R (2020) Investigation on slags of CaO-CaF2-SiO2- Al2O3 based electrode coatings developed for power plant welds. Ceram Int 46:8774–8786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar V, Chhibber R (2022) Physicochemical and thermophysical properties of CaO–TiO2–SiO2–Na3AlF6 system based electrode coating for AUSC power plant. Ceram Int 48:17412–17424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mahajan S, Sharma L, Chhibber R (2022) Effect of CaO-CaF2-SiO2-Al2O3 based electrode coating constituents and their interactions on the P22 alloy SMAW dissimilar weld metal delta quantities. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01937-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Natalie CA, Olson DL, Blander M (1986) Physical and chemical behavior of welding fluxes. Annu Rev Mater Sci 161:389–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qin R, He G (2013) Mass transfer of nickel-base alloy covered electrode during shielded metal arc welding. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 44:1475–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1505-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eriksson G, Pelton AD (1993) Critical evaluation and optimization of the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the CaO-Al2O3, Al2O3-SiO2, and CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 systems. Metall Trans B 24:807–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sridhar S, Mills KC, Afrange ODC et al (2000) Break temperatures of mould fluxes and their relevance to continuous casting. Ironmak Steelmak 27:238–242. https://doi.org/10.1179/030192300677534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanjilal P, Pal TK, Majumdar SK (2006) Combined effect of flux and welding parameters on chemical composition and mechanical properties of submerged arc weld metal. J Mater Process Technol 171:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. De Vries RC, Roy R, Osborn EF (1955) Phase equilibria in the system SiO2-ZnO-Al2O3. Bur Stand J Res 38:158–171. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.008.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sham K, Liu S (2014) Flux-coating development for SMAW consumable electrode of high-nickel alloys. Weld J 93:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  42. McLean RA, Anderson VL (1966) Extreme vertices design of mixture experiments. Technometrics 8:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1966.10490377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bhandari D, Chhibber R, Arora N, Mehta R (2016) Investigation of TiO2–SiO2–CaO–CaF2 based electrode coatings on weld metal chemistry and mechanical behaviour of bimetallic welds. J Manuf Process 23:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Garai M, Sasmal N, Molla AR et al (2014) Effects of nucleating agents on crystallization and microstructure of fluorophlogopite mica-containing glass-ceramics. J Mater Sci 49:1612–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7844-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sowmya T, Sankaranarayanan SR (2004) Spectroscopic analysis of slags — preliminary observations. VII Int Conf Molten Slags Fluxes Salts 693–698

  46. Kaur G, Kumar M, Arora A et al (2011) Influence of Y2O3 on structural and optical properties of SiO2-BaO-ZnO-xB2O3-(10–x) Y 2O3 glasses and glass ceramics. J Non Cryst Solids 357:858–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.11.103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen Y, Furmann A, Mastalerz M, Schimmelmann A (2014) Quantitative analysis of shales by KBr-FTIR and micro-FTIR. Fuel 116:538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang ZG, Zu XT, Xiang X (2006) Preparation and characterization of polymer/inorganic nanoparticle composites through electron irradiation Z. J Mater Sci 41:1973–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1120-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abdel-karim AM, Salama AH, Hassan ML (2018) Electrical conductivity and dielectric properties of nanofibrillated cellulose thin films from bagasse. J Phys Org Chem 31:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.3851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bondarenko OP, Lychko II, Lankin YN, Popovskii YV (1988) Effect of chemical composition of the slag on consumable electrode penetration into the slag pool. Weld Int 2:6–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507118809451119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bunnell DE, Liu S, Olson DL (1990) Low hydrogen SMAW electrode moisture content determination using electrical capacitance. J Mater Eng 12:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jin X, Ali M (2019) Simple empirical formulas to estimate the dielectric constant and conductivity of concrete. Microw Opt Technol Lett 61:386–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.31577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Khan WN, Chhibber R (2021) Characterization of CaO-CaF2-TiO2-SiO2 based welding slags for physicochemical and thermophysical properties. Silicon 13:1575–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00537-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Fellner P, Matiašovský K (1973) Chemical reactions in molten Na3AlF6—Si02—A1203—A1F3 mixtures. Inst Inorg Chem Slovak Acad Sci 809 34 Bratislava 27:737–741

  55. Kerstan M, Müller M, Rüssel C (2011) Binary, ternary and quaternary silicates of CaO, BaO and ZnO in high thermal expansion seals for solid oxide fuel cells studied by high-temperature X-ray diffraction (HT-XRD). Mater Res Bull 46:2456–2463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.08.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Mills KC (2011) The estimation of slag properties. South African Pyrometallurgy 2011 Int Conf 1–52

  57. Kang Y, Lee J, Morita K (2014) Thermal conductivity of molten slags: a review of measurement techniques and discussion based on microstructural analysis. ISIJ Int 54:2008–2016. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.54.2008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chiho W, Shunhua X (1993) Electrical conductivity of molten slags of CaF2+Al2O3 and CaF2+Al2O3+CaO systems for ESR. ISIJ Int 33:239–244. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.33.239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Jiao Q, Themelis NJ (1988) Correlations of electrical conductivity to slag composition and temperature. Metall Trans B 19:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02666499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hendi AA (2011) Structure, electrical conductivity and dielectric properties of bulk, 2-amino-(4,5- diphenylfuran-3-carbonitrile). Life Sci J 8:554–559

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang J, Leng J, Wang C (2019) Tuning weld metal mechanical. Metall Mater Trans B 50:2083–2087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tian H, Wang Z, Zhao T, Wang C (2022) A raman and multinuclear 29Si, 27Al, and 19F NMR study on the structural roles of CaF2 in SiO2–CaO–Al2O3-based welding fluxes. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 53:232–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02359-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang Z, Zheng X, Zhong M et al (2022) Crystallization behavior of CaF2-TiO2 fluxes geared towards high heat input submerged arc welding. J Non Cryst Solids 591:121716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121716

  64. Kim JB, Lee TH, Sohn I (2018) Effect of compositional variation in TiO2-based flux-cored arc welding fluxes on the thermo-physical properties and mechanical behavior of a weld zone. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 49:2705–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4624-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kim JB, Sohn I (2013) Influence of TiO2/SiO2 and MnO on the viscosity and structure in the TiO2-MnO-SiO2 welding flux system. J Non Cryst Solids 379:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.08.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhong M, Wang C (2022) Insight into the viscosity-structure relationship of MnO–SiO2–MgO–Al2O3 fused submerged arc welding flux. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 53:1364–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-022-02507-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Sabu KRP, Rao KVC, Nair CGR (1991) A comparative study on the acidic properties and catalytic activities of TiO 2, SiO 2, Al 2 O 3, SiO 2 –Al 2 O 3, SiO 2 –TiO 2, Al 2 O 3 –TiO 2, and TiO 2 –SiO 2 –Al 2 O 3. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 64:1920–1925. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.64.1920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang C, Wang Z, Yang J (2022) Revealing the viscosity-structure relationship of SiO2–MnO–CaO fluxes geared toward high heat input submerged arc welding. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 53:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02391-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sharma L, Chhibber R (2020) Study of weld bead chemical, microhardness & microstructural analysis using submerged arc welding fluxes for linepipe steel applications. Ceram Int 46:24615–24623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Sharma L, Chhibber R (2019) Design of TiO2-SiO2-MgO and SiO2-MgO-Al2O3-based submerged arc fluxes for multipass bead on plate pipeline steel welds. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME 141.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043375

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is requested to editorial board please acknowledge the present research for possible publication in Silicon journal. The content is new and unpublished.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Alok Gupta contributed to the material preparation, data collection and analysis, research planning and execution, and writing the original manuscript draft. Jaiveer Singh and Rahul Chhibber contributed to planning the experiment, supervision, technical discussion, and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alok Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

I, alok gupta, on behalf of other co-authors, certified that I have taken the ethical approval to publish the data presented in the manuscript. Also, the data used in this manuscript (such as figures) has been cited in this paper.

Consent to Participate

NA.

Consent of Publication

I, alok gupta, on behalf of other co-authors, certify that I have taken permission to publish the present content.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The present research is involved for human participants.

Informed Consent

NA.

Competing Interests

It is certified on behalf of the corresponding author, alok gupta, that the present research is not funded by any external agency, and the authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the present research.

Conflicts of Interests

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author alok gupta that present research is not funded by any external agency, and the authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the present research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2263 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 48 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, A., Singh, J. & Chhibber, R. Investigation of Thermophysical and Physicochemical Characteristics of Al2O3-SiO2- CaO - Na3AlF6 Flux for SMAW Electrode Coating. Silicon 15, 3463–3477 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02258-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02258-6

Keywords

Navigation