Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Foliar Spraying Nano and Ionized Silicon on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Mini-tuber

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The role of protecting and structure-stabilizing silicon (Si) has been demonstrated on different plant species. However, it has not been used in potato seed production under a soilless culture system. Therefore, this experiment was conducted to evaluate the ionized –Si and nano-Si particles on physiological characteristics and yield of potato mini-tuber.

Methods

A greenhouse experiment under a soilless culture system was performed as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) arranged in factorial with three replications. In this study, Si concentration (distilled water (Control), 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 mmol Si L−1) and Si type at two levels (nano and ionized Si-based in sodium silicate) were tested.

Results

The results revealed that foliar application of Si significantly improved the net photosynthesis rate, water use efficiency, mesophyll conductance, Chl a, Chl b, carotenoids, Chl a/b ratio, DPPH radical scavenging, total phenol, shoot dry weight, Si concentration in shoot, mean weight mini-tuber, and yield, whereas transpiration rate in Si-treated plants decreased. Moreover, the highest positive influence of Si was observed at 3.2 mmol L−1. The effect of nano-Si was higher than ionized-Si at all Si concentrations. The results revealed improved physiological characteristics and yield of potato plantlets under nano-Si treatments compared to ionized-Si treatments. However, these relations were not significant under ionized treatment.

Conclusions

This study indicated that the application of Si (nano and ionized) for potato growing and mini-tuber production has positive effects. Generally, under a soilless culture system, Nano-Si has higher efficiency than ionized-Si in mini-tuber production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Cd:

Cadmium

Chl a:

Chlorophyll a

Chl b:

Chlorophyll b

Cart:

carotenoids

DPPH:

DPPH radical scavenging

MC:

Mesophyll conductance

Pn:

Net photosynthetic rate

TW:

mini-tuber weight

RCBD:

randomized complete block design

Si:

Silicon

Tr:

Transpiration rate

T.phenol:

Total phenol

SiS:

Si concentration in shoot

TY:

mini-tuber yield

WUE:

Water use efficiency

References

  1. FAO (2021) Website of the FAO. Available online at http://faostat.fao.org

  2. Khawla BJ, Sameh M, Imen G, Donyes F, Dhouha G, Raoudha EG, Oumèma NE (2014) Potato peel as feedstock for bioethanol production: A comparison of acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind Crop Prod 52:144–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma X, Wang Y, Liu M, Xu J, Xu Z (2015) Effects of green and red lights on the growth and morphogenesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plantlets in vitro. Sci Hortic 190:104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ritter E, Angulo B, Riga P, Herran C, Relloso J, San Jose M (2001) Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers. Potato Res 44:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adatia MH, Bestford RT (1986) The effect of silicon in cucumber plants grown in recirculating nutrient solution. Ann Bot 58:343–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nazaralian S, Majd A, Irian S, Najafi F, Ghahremaninejad F, Landberg T, Greger M (2017) Comparison of silicon nanoparticles and silicate treatments in fenugreek. Plant Physiol Biochem 115:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rastogi A, Tripathi DK, Yadav S, Chauhan DK, Živčák M, Ghorbanpour M, Ibrahim ElSheery N, Brestic M (2019) Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture. Biotech, 9, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haghighi M, Pessarakli M (2013) Influence of silicon and nano-silicon on salinity tolerance of cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at early growth stage. Sci Hortic 161:111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mushtaq A, Khan Z, Khan S, Rizwan S, Jabeen U, Farrukh B, Ismail T, Anjum Sh, Masood A (2020) Effect of silicon on antioxidant enzymes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under salt stress. Silicon 12:2783–2788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Avila RG, Magalhães PC, da Silva EM, Gomes Júnior CC, de Paula Lana UG, de Alvarenga AA, de Souza TC (2020) Silicon supplementation improves tolerance to water deficiency in sorghum plants by increasing root system growth and improving photosynthesis. Silicon 12:2545–2554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng J, Shi Q, Wang X, Wei M, Yang F, Xu H (2010) Silicon supplementation ameliorated the inhibition of photosynthesis and nitrate metabolism by cadmium (Cd) toxicity in Cucumis sativus L. Sci Hortic 123:521–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mateos-Naranjo E, Gallé A, Florez-Sarasa I, Alejandro Perdomo J, Galmés J, Ribas-Carbó M, Flexas J (2015) Assessment of the role of silicon in the Cu-tolerance of the C4 grass Spartina densiflora. J Plant Physiol 178:74–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Dubey NK (2015) Silicon nanoparticles (SiNp) alleviate chromium (VI) phytotoxicity in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 96:189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Epstein E (2009) Silicon: its manifold roles in plants. Ann Appl Biol 155:155–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Asmar A, Castro EM, Pasqual M, Pereira FJ, Soares JDR (2013) Changes in leaf anatomy and photosynthesis of ionizedpropagated banana plantlets under different silicon sources. Sci Hortic 161:328–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sattar A, Cheema MA, Ali H, Sher A, Ijaz M, Hussain M, Hassan W, Abbas T (2016) Silicon mediates the changes in water relations, photosynthetic pigments, enzymatic antioxidants activity and nutrient uptake in maize seedling under salt stress. Grassl Sci 62:262–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Wang F, Gao S (2014) Foliar application with nano-silicon alleviates Cd toxicity in rice seedlings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:2837–2845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gagoonani S, Enteshari S, Delavar K, Behyar M (2011) Interactive effects of silicon and aluminum on the malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, protein and phenolic compounds in Borago officinalis L. J Med Plants Res 5:5818–5827

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shetty R, Frette X, Jensen B, shety PN, Jensen JD, Jørgensen HJL, Newman M, Christensen LP (2011) Silicon-induced changes in antifungal phenolic Acids, flavonoids, and Key phenylpropanoid pathway genes during the interaction between miniature Roses and the biotrophic pathogen Podosphaera pannosa. Plant Physiol 157:2194–2205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang M, Liang Y, Chu G (2017) Applying silicate fertilizer increases both yield and quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) grown on calcareous grey desert soil. Sci Hortic 225:757–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao AJ, Quigg A, Santschi PH, Sigg L (2008) Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology, 17, 372–386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haghighi M, Afifipour Z, Mozafarian M (2012) The effect of N-Si on tomato seed germination under salinity levels. J Biodivers Environ Sci 6:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mahdavi S, Kafi M, Fallahi E, Shokrpour M, Tabrizi L (2016) Water stress, nano silica, and digoxin effects on minerals, chlorophyll index, and growth of ryegrass. Int J Plant Prod 10:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ Calif Agric Exp Stn 347:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 16:144–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Abe N, Murata T, Hirota A (1998) Novel 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryhy- drazyl- radical scavengers, bisorbicillin and demethyltrichodimerol, from a fungus. Biosci Biotechnol Bochem 62:661–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elliot CL, Snyder GH (1991) Autoclave-induced digestion for the colorimetric determination of silicon in rice straw. J Agric Food Chem 39:1118–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang YC (1998) Effect of Si on leaf ultrastructure, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity in barley under salt stress. Pedosphere, 8, 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shen X, Zhou Y, Duan L, Li Z, Eneji AE, Li J (2010) Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation. J Plant Physiol 167:1248–1252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clé C, Hill LM, Niggeweg R, Martin CR, Guisez Y, Prinsen E, Jansen MAK (2008). Modulation of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis in Solanum lycopersicum; consequences for phenolic accumulation and UV-tolerance. Phytochemistry, 69, 2149–2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao B, Ma Q, Zhao Q, Wang L, Xu K (2015) Effects of silicon on absorbed light allocation, antioxidant enzymes and ultrastructure of chloroplasts in tomato leaves under simulated drought stress. Sci Hortic 194:53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kefeli VI, Kalevitch MV, Borsari B (2003) Phenolic cycle in plants and environment. J Cell Mol Biol 2:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gong HJ, Chen KM (2012) The regulatory role of silicon on water relations, photosynthetic gas exchange, and carboxylation activities of wheat leaves in field drought conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 34:1589–1594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee SK, Sohn EY, Hamayun M, Yoon JY, Lee IJ (2010) Effect of silicon on growth and salinity stress of soybean plant grown under hydroponic system. Agrofor Syst 80:333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taiz L, Zeiger E, MØller IM, Murphy A (2015) Plant physiology and development. sixth ed. Published by Sinauer Associates

  37. Kitajima K, Hogan KP (2003). Increases of chlorophyll a/b ratios during acclimation of tropical woody seedlings to nitrogen limitation and high light. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26(6), 857–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Romero-Aranda MR, Jurado O, Cuartero J (2006) Silicon alleviates the deleterious salt effect on tomato plant growth by improving plant water status. J Plant Physiol 163:847–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Abdel-Haliem MEF, Hegazy HS, Hassan NS, Nagui DM (2017) Effect of silica ions and nano silica on rice plants under salinity stress. Ecol Eng 99:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH (2014) Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds Mill.). Saudi J Biol Sci 21:13–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, London, p 887

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Central Ferdowsi University of Mashhad labs and Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council for financial and technical support to carry out this work. The authors would like to appreciate from Yekta Seed Technologists Company for providing equipment for tissue culture of potato.

Funding

This study was financed in part by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bijan Saadatian designed and performed the experiments, Mohamad Kafi was involved in planning and supervised the project, Mohamad Banayan aval conceived the original idea and supervised the project Hossein Hammami Processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, wrote the manuscript with support from all authors. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Hammami.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saadatian, B., Kafi, M., Bannayan, M. et al. Effects of Foliar Spraying Nano and Ionized Silicon on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Mini-tuber. Silicon 14, 8067–8079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01565-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01565-8

Keywords

Navigation