Skip to main content
Log in

Technological Trajectory Analysis of Patent Citation Networks: Examining the Technological Evolution of Computer Graphic Processing Systems

  • Article
  • Published:
The Review of Socionetwork Strategies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper quantitatively analyzes how technology has evolved within the technological field of computer graphic processing systems. A path-dependent technological development path is called a ‘technological trajectory’ in the field of Innovation Economics. The technological trajectory of a technological field can be mapped as the main paths of patent citation networks. Using a method called main path analysis, main paths are calculated from the whole patent citation network data of the technological field. This paper examines how technology has evolved within the technological field of computer graphic processing systems using main path analysis. In addition, the change of the main paths over time is analyzed. According to this analysis, the appearances and disappearances of nodes on the main paths show certain patterns. First, all nodes observed on the main paths three times consecutively at 5-year intervals did not drop out from the main paths in the long term. Second, most of the appearances and disappearances of the nodes occur toward the end of the main paths. These observations are consistent with the technological lock-in process. The result of this research suggests that it takes less than 10 years to determine which technologies are locked-in. In addition, various patterns of the appearances and disappearances of companies owning patents on the main paths are also observed. Three companies are taken as examples to illustrate these patterns. These observations provide insight into how knowledge networks are formed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: a study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: the development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Possas, M. L., Salles-Filho, S., & da Silveira, J. M. (1996). An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: some preliminary remarks. Research Policy, 25(6), 933–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vincenti, W. G. (1995). The retractable airplane landing gear-response. Technology and Culture, 36(2), 453–454.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(4), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinelli, A. (2012). An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry. Research Policy, 41(2), 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barberá-Tomás, D., Jiménez-Sáez, F., & Castelló-Molina, I. (2011). Mapping the importance of the real world: the validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks. Research Policy, 40(3), 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T. S., Ossenbrink, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Technology life-cycles in the energy sector—technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 104, 102–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davies, A., & Hobday, M. (2005). The business of projects: managing innovation in complex products and systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, D., & Sheng, L. (2020). Knowledge diffusion paths of blockchain domain: the main path analysis. Scientometrics, 125(1), 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao, Yu., Lu, L. Y. Y., Liu, J. S., & Zhou, Z. (2014). Knowledge diffusion path analysis of data quality literature: a main path analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 594–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barbieri, N., Ghisetti, C., Gilli, M., Marin, G., & Nicolli, F. (2016). A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis: a survey of the literature on environmental innovation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 596–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, H., Wang, J.-J., Xue, Y., & Cui, X. (2016). IT outsourcing research from 1992 to 2013: a literature review based on main path analysis. Information & Management, 53(2), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung, H., & Lee, B. G. (2020). Research trends in text mining: semantic network and main path analysis of selected journals. Expert Systems with Applications, 162, 113851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Wen-Min, Lu., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: a citation-based literature survey. Omega (Oxford), 41(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, J., Tseng, F.-M., & Lu, L. Y. Y. (2018). Developmental trajectories of new energy vehicle research in economic management: main path analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 137, 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hung, S.-C., Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2014). Technological change in lithium iron phosphate battery: the key-route main path analysis. Scientometrics, 100(1), 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu, H., Wang, M., Li, P., Jiang, S., Wei, Hu., Guo, X., & Cao, M. (2019). Tracing knowledge development trajectories of the internet of things domain: a main path analysis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(12), 6531–6540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2018). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Rev. and expand (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, J. S., & Kuan, C.-H. (2016). A new approach for main path analysis: decay in knowledge diffusion. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dranove, D., & Gandal, N. (2003). The Dvd-vs.-Divx standard war: empirical evidence of network effects and preannouncement effects. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koski, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2005). Entry, standards and competition: firm strategies and the diffusion of mobile telephony. Review of Industrial Organization, 26(1), 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McClanahan Chris. (2011). History and evolution of GPU architecture: a paper survey. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2337358. Accessed 16 Jan 2021.

  30. Singer, Graham. (2019). The History of the Modern Graphics Processor. Techspot. https://www.techspot.com/article/650-history-of-the-gpu/. Accessed 16 Jan 2021.

  31. Peddie, Jon. (2019). Famous Graphics Chips: IBM’s Professional Graphics, the PGC and 8514/A. IEEE Computer Society Tech News. https://www.computer.org/publications/tech-news/chasing-pixels/Famous-Graphics-Chips-IBMs-professional-graphics-the-PGC-and-8514A. Accessed 16 Jan 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors benefited from comments by and discussion with Professor Hideyuki Tanaka and Project Assistant Professor Yuya Shibuya of the Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, The University of Tokyo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ichiro Watanabe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, I., Takagi, S. Technological Trajectory Analysis of Patent Citation Networks: Examining the Technological Evolution of Computer Graphic Processing Systems. Rev Socionetwork Strat 15, 1–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-020-00066-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-020-00066-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation