Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast Cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish Population

  • Review
  • Published:
Current Breast Cancer Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Ashkenazi Jewish people have an elevated risk for breast cancer, driven largely by genetic pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes. In this review, we explore breast cancer within this population, focusing on both medical and cultural perspectives.

Recent Findings

BRCA1/2 carriers have a lifetime breast cancer risk approaching 70%. Furthermore, carriers experience early age of cancer onset, greater likelihood for contralateral breast cancer, increased risk of triple-negative histology, more advanced stage of disease, and overall worse prognosis. It is critical to consider the complex interplay of religion, culture, and cancer for all patients. This is especially true for Ashkenazi Jewish individuals, where community values and customs can directly impact treatment decisions.

Summary

Ashkenazi Jewish individuals have an elevated risk for aggressive breast cancers that develop at an early age. Provider awareness of the distinctive clinical and cultural implications of breast cancer for this population is critical to provide optimal patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2023. Atanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2402–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Group ABCS. Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Br J Cancer. 2000;83(10):1301–8. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. King MC, Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A. Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award. JAMA. 2014;312(11):1091–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.12483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(11):1329–33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB, Group NYBCS. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088759.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kauff ND, Perez-Segura P, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Siegel B, Schluger A, et al. Incidence of non-founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in high risk Ashkenazi breast and ovarian cancer families. J Med Genet. 2002;39(8):611–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.39.8.611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox DM, Nelson KL, Clytone M, Collins DL. Hereditary cancer screening: case reports and review of literature on ten Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018;6(6):1236–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Robson ME, Chappuis PO, Satagopan J, Wong N, Boyd J, Goffin JR, et al. A combined analysis of outcome following breast cancer: differences in survival based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and administration of adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(1):R8–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dagan E, Gershoni-Baruch R, Kurolap A, Fried G. Early onset breast cancer in Ashkenazi women carriers of founder BRCA1/2 mutations: beyond 10 years of follow-up. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12594.

  11. Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, et al. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(1):77–102. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.

  12. • Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B, Viale G, Fumagalli D, Rastogi P, et al. Adjuvant olaparib for patients with. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(25):2394–405. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2105215.This paper is relevant, as it shows that “among patients with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer and germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, adjuvant olaparib after completion of local treatment and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer survival free of invasive or distant disease than was placebo.”

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tung NM, Zakalik D, Somerfield MR, Panel HBCGE. Adjuvant PARP inhibitors in patients with high-risk early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer and germline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(26):2959–61. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olaparib tablets. United States Prescribing Information. US National Library of Medicine. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/208558s023lbl.pdf.

  15. Shieh Y, Eklund M, Madlensky L, Sawyer SD, Thompson CK, Stover Fiscalini A, et al. Breast cancer screening in the precision medicine era: risk-based screening in a population-based trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw290.

  16. Pashayan N, Duffy SW, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Burton H, Neal DE, et al. Polygenic susceptibility to prostate and breast cancer: implications for personalised screening. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(10):1656–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. • Esserman L, Eklund M, Veer LV, Shieh Y, Tice J, Ziv E, et al. The WISDOM study: a new approach to screening can and should be tested. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;189(3):593–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06346-w.This paper is relevant, as it describes the personalized screening approach being investigated by WISDOM which recommends a screening age to start and frequency based upon an individual’s breast cancer risk assessment rather than general guidelines.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM. Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(2):80–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, van’t Veer L, Garber JE, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE study group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1055–62. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.04.188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Bonanni B, Costantino JP, Cummings S, DeCensi A, et al. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2013;381(9880):1827–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60140-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Grann VR, Jacobson JS, Thomason D, Hershman D, Heitjan DF, Neugut AI. Effect of prevention strategies on survival and quality-adjusted survival of women with BRCA1/2 mutations: an updated decision analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(10):2520–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.10.101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK. Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):222–31. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(5):427–37. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Warner E, Hill K, Causer P, Plewes D, Jong R, Yaffe M, et al. Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1664–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0835.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE, Garber AM. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA. 2006;295(20):2374–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.20.2374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, Lee M, Walsh T, Owens K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. JAMA. 2001;286(18):2251–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.18.2251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM, Cecchini RS, Atkins JN, et al. Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. JAMA. 2006;295(23):2727–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.23.joc60074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, Cheung AM, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, et al. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2381–91. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Knox J, Cawthorn S, et al. Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1041–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62292-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200107193450301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ludwig KK, Neuner J, Butler A, Geurts JL, Kong AL. Risk reduction and survival benefit of prophylactic surgery in BRCA mutation carriers, a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2016;212(4):660–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304(9):967–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van’t Veer L, Garber JE, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(21):1616–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(21):1609–15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marchetti C, De Felice F, Palaia I, Perniola G, Musella A, Musio D, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a meta-analysis on impact on ovarian cancer risk and all cause mortality in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-014-0150-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Metcalfe KA, Poll A, Royer R, Llacuachaqui M, Tulman A, Sun P, Narod SA. Screening for founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in unselected Jewish women. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):387–91. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Manchanda R, Loggenberg K, Sanderson S, Burnell M, Wardle J, Gessler S, et al. Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(1):379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gabai-Kapara E, Lahad A, Kaufman B, Friedman E, Segev S, Renbaum P, et al. Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(39):14205–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415979111.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Metcalfe KA, Eisen A, Lerner-Ellis J, Narod SA. Is it time to offer BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing to all Jewish women? Curr Oncol. 2015;22(4):e233–6. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Tiller JM, Cousens NE, Kaur R, Rowley S, Ko YA, Mahale S, et al. Population-based. J Med Genet. 2023;60(3):265–73. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2022-108519.This paper is highly relevant, as it describes the successful implementation of two BRCA-Jewish founder mutation screening programs in Australia (one using an online tool, and one based on in-person group sessions). Both programs were highly acceptable to Jewish communities in Australia.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Metcalfe KA, Mian N, Enmore M, Poll A, Llacuachaqui M, Nanda S, et al. Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133(2):735–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1941-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Manchanda R, Patel S, Antoniou AC, Levy-Lahad E, Turnbull C, Evans DG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of population based BRCA testing with varying Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):578.e1-578.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. •• Reisel D, Burnell M, Side L, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, Desai R, et al. Jewish cultural and religious factors and uptake of population-based BRCA testing across denominations: a cohort study. BJOG. 2022;129(6):959–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16994.This paper is highly relevant, as it assessed the association between Jewish cultural/religious identity with interest in the uptake of population-based BRCA-testing. Overall, outcomes suggested that BRCA testing rates were high amongst all Jewish denominations, and Jewish identity did not appear to influence interest in or uptake rates of BRCA testing.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Manchanda R, Burnell M, Gaba F, Sanderson S, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, et al. Attitude towards and factors affecting uptake of population-based BRCA testing in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: a cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126(6):784–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharsheret TJBOCC: Sharsheret, THE JEWISH BREAST & OVARIAN CANCER COMMUNITY. https://sharsheret.org/ (2023). Accessed.

  46. MIkvah.org: Living with breast cancer: the healing power of mikvah. https://www.mikvah.org/article/living_with_breast_cancer%3A_the_healing_power_of_mikvah (2023). Accessed.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M. K. F., L. R. P., A. K. F., and E. S. wrote the main manuscript text, and M. K. F. prepared Fig. 1. J. T. B. helped to draft sections of the manuscript, assist with editing, and format citations. A. K. F. and E. S. helped to draft and edit sections of the manuscript, as well as select which patient testimonies to include.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa K. Frey.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of Interest

There are no disclosures to report.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frey, M.K., Perez, L.R., Brewer, J.T. et al. Breast Cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish Population. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 16, 98–105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-024-00528-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-024-00528-3

Keywords

Navigation