Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Software Quality and Development Speed in Global Software Development Teams

The Role of Previous Working Ties and National Diversity

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper draws on information processing theory to propose that national diversity creates barriers to the integration of information among members of global software development teams, negatively impacting software quality and development speed. However, the effect of such relationships was expected to be contingent upon the amount of time that team members had worked together in the past (i.e., previous working ties). Hypotheses were tested in a field study involving 62 global software development teams distributed across Europe and Central and South America. Teams with high levels of previous working ties developed greater quality software at a faster pace. National diversity had a positive effect on software quality in teams with high levels of previous working ties, but a negative effect in teams with low levels of previous working ties. National diversity also had a negative impact on software development speed, but the effect was less pronounced among teams with high levels of previous working ties than on teams low in previous working ties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25(1):107–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoko OB, Konrad AM, Boyle MV (2012) Online work: managing conflict and emotions for performance in virtual teams. Europ Manag J 30(2):156–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baba ML, Gluesing J, Ratner H, Wagner KH (2004) The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team. J Organ Behav 25(5):547–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Davis GB, Slaughter SA (1998) Software development practices, software complexity, and software maintenance performance: a field study. Manag Sci 44(4):433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn P, Ngwenyama O (2009) Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Inf Syst J 19(3):227–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau P (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh WF, Ren Y, Kiesler S, Bussjaeger R (2007) Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organization. Organ Sci 18(4):595–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon DP, Hollingshead AB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organizations: matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ Sci 15(6):633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: a status characteristics perspective. Adm Sci Q 48(4):557–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton AM, Cummings J (2012) A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad Manag Rev 37(3):441–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Conchuir EÓ, Agerfalk PJ, Olsson HH, Fitzgerald B (2009) Global software development: where are the benefits? Commun ACM 52(8):127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins KC, Robey D, Zigurs L (2007) Managing strategic contradictions in hybrid teams. Europ J Inf Syst 16(4):460–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci 12(3):346–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2007) Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):761–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings J, Espinosa JA, Pickering CK (2009) Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: a relational model of coordination delay. Inf Syst Res 20(3):420–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curşeu PL, Schruijer SGL (2010) Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 14(1):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damian D, Zowghi D (2003) RE challenges in multi-site software development organizations. Requir Eng 8(3):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern J, Winkler J, Heinzl A (2008) Explaining variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to india. MIS Q 32(2):333–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley PC, Mosakowski E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad Manag J 43(1):26–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2):350–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elron E (1997) Top management teams within multinational corporations: effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadersh Q 8(4):393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ Sci 18(4):613–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating. Manag Sci 46(12):1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol CM, O’Connor EJ (2005) Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: untangling the contradictions. Organ Sci 16(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H, Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: transforming resources into performance. Acad Manag J 55(4):998–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CB, Gibbs JL (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Adm Sci Q 51(3):451–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal A, Gosain S (2010) Research note – the role of organizational controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing: implications for project performance. Inform Syst Res 21(4):960–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP (1998) Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad Manag J 41(1):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad Manag J 45(5):1029–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ Sci 14(6):615–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: the moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ Sci 16(3):290–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol Bull 121(1):43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1983) The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. J Int Bus Stud 14(2):75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmbeck GN (2002) Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol 27(1):87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: evidence from indian software services. Manag Sci 55(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm Sci Q 40(2):256–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y (2007) The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Q 31(4):783–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J Politic Econ 100(4):801–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli A, Tan BC, Wei K (2007) Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. J Manag Inf Syst 23(3):237–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayworth T, Leidner D (2002) Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J Manag Inf Syst 18(3):7–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskin H (2009) Antecedents and consequences of team memory in software development projects. Inf Manag 46(7):388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotlarsky J, van Fenema PC, Willcocks LP (2008) Developing a knowledge-based perspective on coordination: the case of global software projects. Inf Manag 45(2):96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan MS, Kriebel CH, Kekre S, Mukhopadhyay T (2000) An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Manag Sci 46(6):745–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1986) Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, p 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. J Appl Psychol 88(4):587–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K, Herndon B (2011) Transactive memory systems: current issues and future research directions. Organ Sci 22(5):1254–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT (2000) An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J Appl Psychol 85(3):407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss M, Hung Y-T (2003) Because time matters: temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):129–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski ML, Chudoba K (2000) Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ Sci 11(5):473–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen M, Neeley TB (2012) Reflected knowledge and trust in global collaboration. Manag Sci 58(12):2207–2224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munkvold BE, Zigurs I (2007) Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams. Inf Manag 44(3):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary MB, Cummings J (2007) The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Q 31(3):433–452

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA III, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP (1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Adm Sci Q 34(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshri I, van Fenema P, Kotlarsky J (2008) Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory. Inf Syst J 18(6):593–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parise S, Rollag K (2010) Emergent network structure and initial group performance: the moderating role of pre-existing relationships. J Organ Behav 31(6):877–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul DL, McDaniel RR Jr (2004) A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Q 28(2):183–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Adm Sci Q 44(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RS, Behfar KJ (2003) The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: a longitudinal study. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 92(1–2):102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse AN, van Knippenberg D, van Dierendonck D (2012) Cultural diversity and team performance: the role of team member goal orientation. Acad Manag J 36(3):590–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Price KH, Harrison DA, Gavin JH (2006) Withholding inputs in team contexts: member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. J Appl Psychol 91(6):1375–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Manag Sci 51(6):869–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: an integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad Manag Ann 5(1):189–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico R, Sánchez-Manzanares M, Gil F, Gibson CB (2008) Team. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):163–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shachaf P (2008) Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: an exploratory study. Inf Manag 45(2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W, Blahut RE, Hajek B (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: a meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J Int Bus Stud 41(4):690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser G, Stewart DD, Wittenbaum GM (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: the importance of knowing who knows what. J Exp Soc Psychol 31(3):244–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1982) Instrumentality, identity and social comparisons. In: Tajfel H (ed) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 483–507

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ginkel WP, van Knippenberg D (2009) Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: when and why does it work? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108(2):218–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg D, Dreu De, Carsten KW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89(6):1008–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vashdi D, Bamberger P, Erez M (2012) Can surgical teams ever learn? Towards a theory of transitive team learning in action teams. Acad Manag J 56(4):945–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glinow MA, Shapiro DL, Brett JM (2004) Can wetalk, and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. Acad Manag Rev Spec Issue: Lang Organ 29(4):578–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2002) Cross-cultural software production and use: a structurational analysis. MIS Q 26(4):359–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warkentin M, Beranek PM (1999) Training to improve virtual team communication. Inf Syst J 9(4):271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad Manag J 36(3):590–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba K, Crowston K (2012) Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Inf Syst J 22(1):29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen B, Goethals GR (eds) Theories of group behavior. Springer, New York, pp 185–208

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Decision Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 S Morgan Street, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA

    Iván Alfaro & Ranganathan Chandrasekaran

Authors
  1. Iván Alfaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ranganathan Chandrasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iván Alfaro.

Additional information

Accepted after five revisions by Prof. Dr. Heinzl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alfaro, I., Chandrasekaran, R. Software Quality and Development Speed in Global Software Development Teams. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57, 91–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0372-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0372-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation