Skip to main content
Log in

Bi-objective optimization model with economic and environmental consideration for an integrated supply chain with random demand and flexible production rate

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An integrated production–inventory model that simultaneously considers economic and environmental dimensions is developed in this paper. In the area of supply chain management, researchers and practioners often minimize the cost or profit, keeping the environmental aspect as a constraint. Only a few papers have taken up multi-objective optimization to offer better decision-making. The order quantity, re-order level, production rate, shipment number and vehicle velocity are optimized to minimize the total expected cost and the emissions simultaneously under random demand and in the presence of backorder and loss of sales. A Pareto front is developed to present the trade-off between expected cost and emission. The solution of the multi-objective model is obtained through a benchmark and widely used multi-objective algorithm NSGA-II. The key insights and outcomes are presented through numerical illustration and sensitivity analysis of important parameters. It has been observed that with increasing velocity total expected cost decreases. The total expected emission also decreases initially and increases after a threshold limit. Production rate takes few distinct values while offering the trade-off between expected cost and emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data available within the article.

References

  1. Battini, D., Calzavara, M., Isolan, I., Sgarbossa, F., Zangaro, F.: Sustainability in material purchasing: a multi-objective economic order quantity model under carbon trading. Sustainability 10(12), 4438 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battini, D., Persona, A., Sgarbossa, F.: A sustainable EOQ model: theoretical formulation and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149, 145–153 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazan, E., Jaber, M.Y., Zanoni, S.: Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183, 394–408 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouchery, Y., Ghaffari, A., Jemai, Z., Dallery, Y.: Including sustainability criteria into inventory models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222(2), 229–240 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esmaeilian, S., Mohamadi, D., Esmaelian, M., Ebrahimpour, M.: A multi-objective model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain of perishable products under two carbon emission regulations. J. Model. Manag. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-11-2020-0299/full/html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh, A.: Optimization of a two-echelon supply chain with random demand and random defect rate under strict carbon cap policy. Benchmark. Int. J. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0537/full/html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh, A.: Optimization of a two-echelon supply chain with random demand and random defect rate under strict carbon cap policy. Benchmark. Int. J. 29(3), 793–816 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Optimizing a two-echelon serial supply chain with different carbon policies. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 9(6), 363–377 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Production–inventory models considering different carbon policies: a review. Int. J. Product. Qual. Manag. 30(1), 1–27 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Optimal lot-sizing under strict carbon cap policy considering stochastic demand. Appl. Math. Model. 44, 688–704 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: An integrated supply chain with uncertain demand and random defect rate under carbon cap-and-trade policy. Int. J. Ind. Eng.Theory Appl. Pract. 27(2), 209–228 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghosh, A., Kumar, N., Choudhary, P.: Proposal of “carbon-lockdown” policy in the light of environmental silver lining of COVID19 lockdowns. MDIM Bus. Rev. II I, 36–48 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh, A., Sarmah, S.P., Jha, J.K.: Collaborative model for a two-echelon supply chain with uncertain demand under carbon tax policy. Sādhanā 43(9), 144 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hariga, M., As’ad, R., Shamayleh, A.: Integrated economic and environmental models for a multi stage cold supply chain under carbon tax regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 1357–1371 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hovelaque, V., Bironneau, L.: The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164, 285–291 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaber, M.Y., Glock, C.H., El Saadany, A.M.: Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(1), 69–82 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jauhari, W.A., Pamuji, A.S., Rosyidi, C.N.: Cooperative inventory model for vendor-buyer system with unequal-sized shipment, defective items and carbon emission cost. Int. J. Logist. Syst. 19(2), 163–186 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kelle, P., Silver, E.A.: Forecasting the returns of reusable containers. J. Oper. Manag. 8(1), 17–35 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Konur, D., Campbell, J.F., Monfared, S.A.: Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers. Omega 71, 46–65 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kushwaha, S., Ghosh, A., Rao, A.K.: Collection activity channels selection in a reverse supply chain under a carbon cap- and-trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121034 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahapatra, M.S., Pradhan, P.C., Jha, J.K.: Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria. Operat. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00661-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitra, S., Datta, P.P.: Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: an exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(7), 2085–2107 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qin, J., Bai, X., Xia, L.: Sustainable trade credit and replenishment policies under the cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. Sustainability. 7(12), 16340–16361 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rofin, T.M., Mahapatra, M.S., Mahanty, B.: Impact of green retail operations on the profit of the manufacturer and the retailer under different pricing strategies. Opsearch 58, 125–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00478-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarkar, B., Saren, S., Sinha, D., Hur, S.: Effect of unequal lot sizes, variable setup cost, and carbon emission cost in a supply chain model. Math. Problems Eng. 1, 2015 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Toptal, A., Çetinkaya, B.: How supply chain coordination affects the environment: a carbon footprint perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 250(2), 487–519 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Wahab, M.I.M., Mamun, S.M.H., Ongkunaruk, P.: EOQ models for a coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect items and environmental impact. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134(1), 151–158 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, M., Zou, Y., Lo, M., Chao, Y. 2016. Integrated supply chain inventory model with progressive carbon taxation. Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS, Hong Kong, 16–18 March, Vol. 2.

  31. Zanoni, S., Mazzoldi, L., Jaber, M.Y.: Vendor-managed inventory with consignment stock agreement for single vendor–single buyer under the emission-trading scheme. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(1), 20–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both the authors contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maheswar Singha Mahapatra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, A., Mahapatra, M.S. Bi-objective optimization model with economic and environmental consideration for an integrated supply chain with random demand and flexible production rate. OPSEARCH (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00726-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00726-0

Keywords

Navigation