Abstract
An integrated production–inventory model that simultaneously considers economic and environmental dimensions is developed in this paper. In the area of supply chain management, researchers and practioners often minimize the cost or profit, keeping the environmental aspect as a constraint. Only a few papers have taken up multi-objective optimization to offer better decision-making. The order quantity, re-order level, production rate, shipment number and vehicle velocity are optimized to minimize the total expected cost and the emissions simultaneously under random demand and in the presence of backorder and loss of sales. A Pareto front is developed to present the trade-off between expected cost and emission. The solution of the multi-objective model is obtained through a benchmark and widely used multi-objective algorithm NSGA-II. The key insights and outcomes are presented through numerical illustration and sensitivity analysis of important parameters. It has been observed that with increasing velocity total expected cost decreases. The total expected emission also decreases initially and increases after a threshold limit. Production rate takes few distinct values while offering the trade-off between expected cost and emission.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Data available within the article.
References
Battini, D., Calzavara, M., Isolan, I., Sgarbossa, F., Zangaro, F.: Sustainability in material purchasing: a multi-objective economic order quantity model under carbon trading. Sustainability 10(12), 4438 (2018)
Battini, D., Persona, A., Sgarbossa, F.: A sustainable EOQ model: theoretical formulation and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149, 145–153 (2014)
Bazan, E., Jaber, M.Y., Zanoni, S.: Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183, 394–408 (2017)
Bouchery, Y., Ghaffari, A., Jemai, Z., Dallery, Y.: Including sustainability criteria into inventory models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222(2), 229–240 (2012)
Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley (2001)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)
Esmaeilian, S., Mohamadi, D., Esmaelian, M., Ebrahimpour, M.: A multi-objective model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain of perishable products under two carbon emission regulations. J. Model. Manag. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-11-2020-0299/full/html
Ghosh, A.: Optimization of a two-echelon supply chain with random demand and random defect rate under strict carbon cap policy. Benchmark. Int. J. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0537/full/html
Ghosh, A.: Optimization of a two-echelon supply chain with random demand and random defect rate under strict carbon cap policy. Benchmark. Int. J. 29(3), 793–816 (2022)
Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Optimizing a two-echelon serial supply chain with different carbon policies. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 9(6), 363–377 (2016)
Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Production–inventory models considering different carbon policies: a review. Int. J. Product. Qual. Manag. 30(1), 1–27 (2020)
Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Optimal lot-sizing under strict carbon cap policy considering stochastic demand. Appl. Math. Model. 44, 688–704 (2017)
Ghosh, A., Jha, J.K., Sarmah, S.P.: An integrated supply chain with uncertain demand and random defect rate under carbon cap-and-trade policy. Int. J. Ind. Eng.Theory Appl. Pract. 27(2), 209–228 (2020)
Ghosh, A., Kumar, N., Choudhary, P.: Proposal of “carbon-lockdown” policy in the light of environmental silver lining of COVID19 lockdowns. MDIM Bus. Rev. II I, 36–48 (2021)
Ghosh, A., Sarmah, S.P., Jha, J.K.: Collaborative model for a two-echelon supply chain with uncertain demand under carbon tax policy. Sādhanā 43(9), 144 (2018)
Hariga, M., As’ad, R., Shamayleh, A.: Integrated economic and environmental models for a multi stage cold supply chain under carbon tax regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 1357–1371 (2017)
Hovelaque, V., Bironneau, L.: The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164, 285–291 (2015)
Jaber, M.Y., Glock, C.H., El Saadany, A.M.: Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(1), 69–82 (2013)
Jauhari, W.A., Pamuji, A.S., Rosyidi, C.N.: Cooperative inventory model for vendor-buyer system with unequal-sized shipment, defective items and carbon emission cost. Int. J. Logist. Syst. 19(2), 163–186 (2014)
Kelle, P., Silver, E.A.: Forecasting the returns of reusable containers. J. Oper. Manag. 8(1), 17–35 (1989)
Konur, D., Campbell, J.F., Monfared, S.A.: Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers. Omega 71, 46–65 (2017)
Kushwaha, S., Ghosh, A., Rao, A.K.: Collection activity channels selection in a reverse supply chain under a carbon cap- and-trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121034 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121034
Mahapatra, M.S., Pradhan, P.C., Jha, J.K.: Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria. Operat. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00661-2
Mitra, S., Datta, P.P.: Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: an exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(7), 2085–2107 (2014)
Qin, J., Bai, X., Xia, L.: Sustainable trade credit and replenishment policies under the cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. Sustainability. 7(12), 16340–16361 (2015)
Rofin, T.M., Mahapatra, M.S., Mahanty, B.: Impact of green retail operations on the profit of the manufacturer and the retailer under different pricing strategies. Opsearch 58, 125–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00478-1
Sarkar, B., Saren, S., Sinha, D., Hur, S.: Effect of unequal lot sizes, variable setup cost, and carbon emission cost in a supply chain model. Math. Problems Eng. 1, 2015 (2015)
Toptal, A., Çetinkaya, B.: How supply chain coordination affects the environment: a carbon footprint perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 250(2), 487–519 (2017)
Wahab, M.I.M., Mamun, S.M.H., Ongkunaruk, P.: EOQ models for a coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect items and environmental impact. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134(1), 151–158 (2011)
Yang, M., Zou, Y., Lo, M., Chao, Y. 2016. Integrated supply chain inventory model with progressive carbon taxation. Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS, Hong Kong, 16–18 March, Vol. 2.
Zanoni, S., Mazzoldi, L., Jaber, M.Y.: Vendor-managed inventory with consignment stock agreement for single vendor–single buyer under the emission-trading scheme. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(1), 20–31 (2014)
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both the authors contributed equally.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghosh, A., Mahapatra, M.S. Bi-objective optimization model with economic and environmental consideration for an integrated supply chain with random demand and flexible production rate. OPSEARCH (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00726-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00726-0