Abstract
Industrial sectors rely heavily on interferometric technique for manufacturing and production. This technique is also commonly utilized for object characterization, investigation, and testing. This work’s goal is to provide a broad review of the state-of-the-art in laser interferometer systems calibration, including a theoretical background measurement of length, as a power technique widely used in industry for direct precision measurement of length and displacement. The essential calibration of laser interferometers at regular intervals ensures the traceability of the measurement chain to the absolute unit of length standard, the meter. The mathematical model equation and measurement method that form the foundation of the uncertainty assessment are explained. The uncertainty assessment is carried out according to JCGM 100:2008-Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The availability of data and material is not applicable as there are no data sets used.
References
H. Takino, Y. Takeuchi, Chiba Institute of Technology 2–17–1 Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275–0016, Japan, Chubu University, Kasugai, Japan, Machining of Smooth Optical Surfaces by Ultraprecision Milling with Compensated Feeding Mechanisms, Int. J. Autom. Technol. 13 185–190. (2019) https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2019.p0185.
G.T. Smith, Machine tool metrology: an Industrial handbook Springer, Cham (2016)
P.K. Kankar, G. Moona, K.A. Desai, Measurement and metrology in advanced manufacturing processes. Mapan 37, 703–705 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-022-00606-w
P. De Groot, J. Biegen, J. Clark, X. Colonna De Lega, D. Grigg, Optical interferometry for measurement of the geometric dimensions of industrial parts. Appl. Opt. 41, 3853 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.003853
M. Das, S.K. Ghosh, K. Kumar, E.J. James, M. Singh, A. Kumar, Laser-based optical interferometer manometer design for primary pressure standard in India. J. Opt. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01347-y
Y. Zhang, K.-N. Joo, F. Guzman, Fiber-based two-wavelength heterodyne displacement interferometer, in: Y. Soskind, L.E. Busse (Eds.), Photonic Instrum. Eng. IX, SPIE, San Francisco, United States, p. 41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2609998
N.V. Raghavendra, L. Krishnamurthy, Engineering metrology and measurements, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, (2013)
A.T. Hoang, T.T. Vu, D.Q. Pham, T.T. Vu, T.D. Nguyen, V.H. Tran, High precision displacement measuring interferometer based on the active modulation index control method. Measurement 214, 112819 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112819
T.T. Vu, H.H. Hoang, T.T. Vu, N.T. Bui, A displacement measuring interferometer based on a frequency-locked laser diode with high modulation frequency. Appl. Sci. 10, 2693 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082693
P. Hu, J. Zhu, X. Zhai, J. Tan, DC-offset-free homodyne interferometer and its nonlinearity compensation. Opt. Express 23, 8399 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.008399
G.N. Vishnyakov, V.L. Minaev, E.V. Shumsky, Homodyne quadrature displacement interferometer. Experimental results. Opt. Spectrosc. 130(5), 327–335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X22050058
T. Podżorny, G. Budzyń, J. Rzepka, Linearization methods of laser interferometers for pico/nano positioning stages. Optik 124, 6345–6348 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.05.054
Y. Qian, J. Li, Q. Feng, Q. He, F. Long, Error analysis of heterodyne interferometry based on one single-mode polarization-maintaining fiber. Sensors 23, 4108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084108
H. Nozato, W. Kokuyama, A. Ota, Improvement and validity of shock measurements using heterodyne laser interferometer. Measurement 77, 67–72 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.037
M. Pisani, A homodyne Michelson interferometer with sub-picometer resolution. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20, 084008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084008
G. Dai, X. Hu, Correction of interferometric high-order nonlinearity error in metrological atomic force microscopy. Nanomanufact. Metrol. 5, 412–422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-022-00154-6
E. Zhang, B. Chen, H. Zheng, X. Teng, Laser heterodyne interference signal processing method based on phase shift of reference signal. Opt. Express 26, 8656 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.008656
P. Hu, J. Wang, X. Lin, X. Xing, H. Fu, J. Tan, Phase measurement method based on digital dual frequency comb for high-precision high-speed heterodyne interferometry. IEEE Sens. J. 23, 9707–9715 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3262281
Y. Wang, Y. Bai, Y. Lu, P. Hu, Z. Li, The next generation heterodyne laser interferometer in joule balance. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 1–8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3276013
L.C. Lipus, G. Budzyn, B. Acko, Analysis of laser interferometer measurement uncertainty by simulating error sources. Int. J. Simul. Model. 20, 339–350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM20-2-563
Z. Buchta, M. Šarbort, M. Čížek, V. Hucl, Š Řeřucha, T. Pikálek, Š Dvořáčková, F. Dvořáček, J. Kůr, P. Konečný, M. Weigl, J. Lazar, O. Číp, System for automatic gauge block length measurement optimized for secondary length metrology. Precis. Eng. 49, 322–331 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.03.002
V. Zivkovic, S. Zelenika, G. Stefanovic, Uncertainty evaluation for the gauge blocks calibration using the modified DMDM gauge block interferometer. Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 3, 19–27 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2012001
A. Winarno, S. Takahashi, A. Hirai, K. Takamasu, H. Matsumoto, Absolute measurement of gauge block without wringing using tandem low-coherence interferometry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 23, 125001 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125001
S.J.A.G. Cosijns, M.J. Jansen, H. Haitjema, Advanced optical incremental sensors: encoders and interferometers, in Smart sensors and MEMS, 2nd edn., ed. by S. Nihtionov, A. Luque (Elsevier Inc., Duxshire, UK, ), pp.245–290, (2018)
D. Flack and J. Hannaford, Fundamental Good Practice in Dimensional Metrology. In: NPL Good Practice Guide No. 80, National Physical Laboratory, 2012.
E. Hecht, Optics, 5th edn. (Pearson Education Inc, Boston, (2017)
A. Hirai, M. Kajima, and S. Telada, Displacement. In Handbook of Optical Metrology: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; Toru Yoshizawa, CRC Press, NPO3D Associates, Yokohama, Japan, 2017, pp. 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18328.
P. Hariharan, Basics of interferometry. Elsevier (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373589-8.X5000-7
W. R. C Rowley, Analysis of laser frequency stability by heterodyne measurement, NPL Report MOM 78, (1986)
B. Samoudi, M.M. Pérez, S. Ferreira-Barragáns, E. Prieto, Absolute optical frequency measurements of iodine-stabilized He-Ne laser at 633 nm by using a femtosecond laser frequency comb. Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 3, 101–106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2012012
B. Samoudi, Realisation of the metre by using a femtosecond laser frequency comb: applications in optical frequency metrology. Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8, 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017008
M. Jewariya, Optical Frequency Comb: A Novel Ruler of Light for Realization of SI Unit Meter, in: D.K. Aswal, S. Yadav, T. Takatsuji, P. Rachakonda, H. Kumar (Eds.), Handb. Metrol Appl., Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp. 219–234 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_13
T.J. Quinn, Practical realization of the definition of the metre (1997). Metrologia 36, 211–244 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/36/3/7
B. Edlén, The refractive index of air. Metrologia 2, 71–80 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/2/2/002
K.P. Birch, M.J. Downs, An updated edlén equation for the refractive index of air. Metrologia 30, 155–162 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/30/3/004
K.P. Birch, M.J. Downs, Correction to the updated edlén equation for the refractive index of air. Metrologia 31, 315–316 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/31/4/006
BIPM, Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, JCGM 100 (2008).
H. Haitjema, Calibration of displacement laser interferometer systems for industrial metrology. Sensors 19, 4100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194100
T.J. Quinn, Practical realization of the definition of the metre, including recommended radiations of other optical frequency standards (2001). Metrologia 40, 103–133 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/40/2/316
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.S. and O.B.: methodology and writing the main manuscript text. B.S.: prepared all figures included in the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interests in financial or personal nature.
Ethical approval
Fortunately, there are no ethical concerns associated with this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Samoudi, B., Bendaou, O. Uncertainty assessment in the calibration of an auto-compensated laser interferometer system. J Opt (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-024-01805-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-024-01805-1