Skip to main content
Log in

Design and analysis of performance parameters for achieving high efficient ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM/Al organic solar cell

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Optics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we designed a highly efficient ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM/Al-based bulk heterojunction organic solar cell. We investigated the performance of various optical and electrical properties of the designed organic solar cells. We improved the power conversion efficiency by using appropriate materials in different layers of the organic solar cells and refractive index and lattice constant matching among the layers. GPVDM simulator was used for simulating various properties of the organic solar cells, such as current density, voltage density, fill factor, and power conversion efficiency. Various parameters of the active layer of the organic solar cells were varied for optimization. In addition, we analyzed the impact of the thickness of the active layer and device series resistance on the improvement of the power conversion efficiency of the organic solar cells. Maximum power conversion efficiency of 16.46% with a fill factor of 74.09% was obtained for a series resistance of 15 ohms. We observed an inversely proportional relationship between power conversion efficiency and series resistance. We optimized the value of the thickness of the active layer as 75 nm while designing the organic solar cells to achieve maximum power conversion efficiency. We strongly believe that the proposed organic solar cell model will play a significant role in achieving high PCE organic solar cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study and its supplementary materials are available within the manuscript.

References

  1. A. Toor, Renewables projected to overtake natural gas as world's second largest power source (2013), http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/28/44773694/. Accessed 25 Nov 2022

  2. M. Lenes, Efficiency Enhancement of Polymer Fullerene Solar Cells. Ph.D thesis, (Zernike Institute, Univ. of Groningen, The Netherlands, 2009–13).

  3. M. Pagliaro, G. Palmisano, R. Ciriminna, Flexible Solar Cells, Chap. 1, (Institute for Nanostructured Materials, Palermo, Italy, 2008), p. 3–4

  4. G. Li, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, Y. Yao, T. Moriarty, K. Emeryand, Y. Yang, High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends. Nat. Mater. 4, 864–868 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C.J. Brabec, N.S. Sariciftci, J.C. Hummelen, Plastic solar cells. Adv. Func. Mater. 11, 15–26 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V.E. Ferry, J.N. Munday, H.A. Atwater, Design considerations for plasmonic photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 22, 4794–4808 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Barker, C. Ramsdale, N. Greenham, Modeling the current-voltage characteristics of bilayer polymer photovoltaic devices. Phys. Rev. B 67, 1–9 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Buxton, N. Clarke, Predicting structure and property relations in polymeric photovoltaic devices. Phys. Rev. B 74, 1–5 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.M. Martin, V.M. Burlakov, H.E. Assender, D.A.R. Barkhouse, A numerical model for explaining the role of the interface morphology in composite solar cells. Appl. Phys. 102, 104–506 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Williams, A.B. Walker, Two-dimensional simulations of bulk heterojunction solar cell characteristics. Nanotechnology 19, 424011 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Shah, V. Ganesan, Correlations between morphologies and photovoltaic properties of RodCoil block copolymers. Macromolecules 43, 543–552 (2010)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Abulimuand, D. Barbero, Measuring the Efficiency and Charge Carrier Mobility of Organic Solar Cells, (Depart. of Physics, Umeå Univ., Sweden, 2012)

  13. Y. Yuan, T.J. Reece, P. Sharma, S. Poddar, S. Ducharme, Efficiency enhancement in organic solar cells with ferroelectric polymers. Nat. Mater. 10, 296–302 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Hudhomme, An overview of molecular acceptors for organic solar cells. Photovolt. 4, 40401 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.-S. Yeo, J.-M. Yun, S.-S. Kim, D.-Y. Kim, J. Kim, S.-I. Na, Variations of cell performance in ITO-free organic solar cells with increasing cell areas. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26, 034010 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Peumans, V. Bulovic, S.R. Forest, Efficient photon harvesting at high optical and electrical intensities in ultrathin organic double-heterostructure photovoltaic diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 26–50 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Niggemann, M. Glatthaar, P. Lewer, C. Muller, J. Wagner, A. Gombert, Trapping light with micro lenses in thin film organic photovoltaic cells. Thin Solid Films 511, 628–633 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Rim, S. Zhao, S.R. Scully, M.D. McGehee, P. Peumans, An effective light trapping configuration for thin-film solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 501 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C.Y. Liu, Hybrid solar cells from polymers and silicon nanocrystals. ASME 3rd International conference on energy sustainability 1, 985–987 (2009)

  20. H. Ade, New materials yield record efficiency polymer solar cells. (2014), http://www.konarka.com/index.php/site/. Accessed 25 Nov 2022

  21. F.C. Krebs, Polymeric Solar Cells Materials Design Manufacture (DEStech Publications Inc., Lancaster, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Solid States Technology, Organic Electronics Workshop. (2011) http://www.electroiq.com/articles/sst/2011/. Accessed 25 Nov 2022

  23. Lisa Zyga, Solar cell sets world record with a stabilized efficiency of 13.6%. http://phys.org/news/2015-06. Accessed 25 Nov 2022

  24. Abu Kowsar et al., Comparative study on solar cell simulators. International Conference on innovation in engineering and technology (ICIET), (2019)

  25. R.B. Kodati et al., A review of solar cell fundamentals and technologies. Adv. Sci. Lett. 26(5), 260–271 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.B. Kodati et al., A survey of solar cell. Adv. Sci. Lett. 26(5), 1060–1065 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Rabeya et al. Design and performance analysis of multijunction organic solar cell exceeding 14% efficiency. 2018 10th International conference on electrical and computer engineering (ICECE), 321–324 (2018)

  28. J. Singh et al., Optimizing the design of flexible PTB7:PC71BM bulk heterojunction and P3HT:SiNW hybrid organic solar cells. Nanosci. Technol. (2014). https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-8141/1/1/00103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Ogata et al., Paper dye-sensitized solar cell based on carbon-nanotube-composite papers. Energies 13, 57 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Meredith et al., Scaling of next generation solution processed organic and perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05514-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Zhou et al., All-small-molecule organic solar cells with over 14% efficiency by optimizing hierarchical morphologies. Nat. Commun. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13292-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Farrokhifar, A. Rostami, N. Sadoogi, Opto-electrical simulation of organic solar cells. UKSim-AMSS 8th European modelling symposium, Pisa Pisa, Italy, (2014)

  33. S. Oh, D. Yeo, K. Park, H. Kim, Performance enhancement of organic solar cells with the LiF/Al cathode structure by the pyromellitic dianhydride layer. Adv. Mater. Res. 415–417, 1608–1610 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. Rastogi, N. Singh, Electrical simulation of organic solar cell at different series resistances and different temperatures. IOSR J. Appl. Phys. 8, 54–57 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Polyanskiy, Refractive index database. https://refractiveindex.info. Accessed 25 Nov 2022

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Apurba Adhikary or Md. Shamim Ahsan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kundu, C.S., Adhikary, A., Ahsan, M.S. et al. Design and analysis of performance parameters for achieving high efficient ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM/Al organic solar cell. J Opt 53, 342–353 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01230-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01230-w

Keywords

Navigation