Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of Performance Prediction Model for TBM Using Rock Mass Properties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Tunnelling projects carried out by Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) present several problems, the most significant of which is predicting machine performance. The improper prediction may result in the rescheduling of the entire project and also lead to high cost overrun. An established rock mass classification system like rock mass rating (RMR) is commonly employed for the development of empirical equations to predict the performance of TBM. However, such TBM performance prediction models have a limited scope of success due to the weights assigned to the input parameters. This issue can be overcome by performing simple, multiple linear, and multiple non-linear regression analyses for determining the most influential input parameters or modifying the weights of the RMR system such that their role in the performance of the TBM is better represented. In this research, an attempt is made to define the influence of different rock mass properties on the performance of the TBM, and a novel model is generated using simple, multiple linear, and multiple non-linear regression analyses. This model uses intact rock mass properties i.e., uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), and fractured rock mass properties like joint spacing (Js), rock quality designation (RQD), and alpha (α) for performance prediction of TBM. This research comprises 119 datasets from three different TBM tunnels sites in Iran for statistical regression analysis. The results showed that the utilized rock mass properties have a great influence on TBM performance and concluded that the TBM performance can be estimated using the newly developed equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeberli, H.U., Wanner, W. (1978) On the influence of discontinuities at the application of tunnelling machines. In: Proc. 3rd International Congress IAEG Madrid, pp.7–14.

  • Barton, N.R. (2000) TBM tunnelling in jointed and faulted rock. CRC Press, Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejari, H., and Hamidi, J.K. (2009) Simultaneous effects of joint spacing and orientation on the penetration rate of TBM using numerical modelling. In: ISRM International Symposium on Rock Mechanics-SINOROCK 2009, OnePetro, pp.083.

  • Bieniawski, Z.T. (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Civil Engineering, v.12, pp.335–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, N., Kuzu, N., Eskikaya, S., and Ozdemir, L. (1997) Cutting performance of jackhammers and roadheaders in Istanbul metro drivages. In: World Tunnel Congress Vol. 97(1), pp.455–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruland, A. (1998) Hard Rock Tunnel Boring: Vol 1–10. Doctoral Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).

  • Cassinelli, F. (1982) Power consumption and metal wear in tunnel-boring machines: analysis of tunnel-boring operation in hard rock. In: Tunnelling 82, Proc 3rd International Symposium, Brighton, 7–11 June 1982, pp.73–81. Publ London: IMM, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)91823-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Q.M., and Zhao, J. (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Internat. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v.46(1), pp.8–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Q. M., Zhao, J., and Jiao, Y. Y. (2005). Numerical modelling of the effects of joint orientation on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 20(2), pp.183–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Q. M, and Zhao, J. (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Internat. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v.46(1), pp.8–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. (1976) Rock exploration for machine manufacturers. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering. Balkema, Johannesburg, pp.173–180

  • Hamidi, J.K., Shahriar, K., Rezai, B., and Rostami, J. (2010) Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using rock mass rating (RMR) system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, v.25(4), pp.333–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour, J., Rostami, J., Khamehchiyan, M., and Bruland, A. (2010) TBM performance analysis in pyroclastic rocks: a case history of karaj water conveyance tunnel. Rock Mech. Rock Engg., v.43(4), pp.427–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0060-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour, J., Rostami, K., Khamehchiyan, M., and Bruland, A. (2009) Developing new equations for TBM performance prediction in carbonate-argillaceous rocks: A case history of Nowsood water conveyance tunnel. Geomechanics and Geoengineering v.4(4), pp.287–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020903174303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour, J., Vanani, A., Rostami, J., and Cheshomi, A. (2016) Evaluation of common TBM performance prediction models based on field data from the second lot of Zagros water conveyance tunnel (ZWCT2). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 52, pp.147–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, E. (2007) Rock Engineering, Course Notes by Evert Hoek. Available from: http://www.Rocscience.Com., p.339

  • Innaurato, N., Mancini, A., and Zaninetti, A. (1991) Forecasting and effective TBM performances in a rapid excavation of a tunnel in Italy. In: 7th ISRM Congress, OnePetro. ISRM-7CONGRESS-1991-200

  • Innaurato, N., Mancini, R., Strangiotti, L., and Sampaolo, A. (1988) Several years of experience with TBM in the excavation of hydroelectric tunnels in Italy. ITAN-90-001972; EDB-90-180053; ERA-16-001338

  • Laughton, C. (1998) Evaluation and prediction of tunnel boring machine performance in variable rock masses. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Lislerud, A. (1988) Hard rock tunnel boring: prognosis and costs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 3(1), pp.9–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-798(88)90029-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab, L L C. (2017). Getting started with Minitab 18. Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA, pp.73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C, Elizabeth, A, and Geoffery, G. (1992) Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York, USA.

  • Nelson, P, O’rourke, and Kulhawt, F. (1983) Factors affecting TBM penetration rates in sedimentary rocks. In: The 24th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), OnePetro. 20–23 June 1983, pp.227–237

  • O’Rourke, Springer, J, and Chodray, S. (1994) Geotechnical parameters and tunnel boring machine performance at Goodwin tunnel, California. In: 1st North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, OnePetro.

  • Ramamurthy, T. (2008) Penetration rate of TBMs. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress, India.

  • Ramezanzadeh, A. (2005) Performance analysis and development of new models for performance prediction of hard rock TBM’s in rock mass. Doctoral Dissertation, Lyon, INSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramezanzadeh, A, Rostami, J, and Tadic, D. (2008). Impact of rock mass characteristics on hard rock tunnel boring machine performance. In: 13th Australian Tunnelling Conference 2008, Engineers Australia and Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp.213.

  • Ribacchi, R, and Fazio, A. (2005) Influence of rock mass parameters on the performance of a TBM in a gneissic formation (Varzo Tunnel). Rock Mech. Rock Engg., v.38(2), pp.105–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-004-0032-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami, J. (1997) Development of a Force Estimation Model for Rock Fragmentation with Disc Cutters through Theoretical Modeling and Physical Measurement of Crushed Zone Pressure. Doctoral Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines.

  • Salimi, A, Moorman, C, and Rostami, J. (2016) Study of TBM performance prediction using rock mass classification. In: World Tunnel Congress, San Francisco, USA.

  • Salimi, A, Rostami, J, and Moorman, C. (2016) TBM performance prediction in basalt and pyroclastic rocks of deccan traps, a case study of Maroshi-Ruparel water supply tunnel. In: ISRM International Symposium-EUROCK 2016, OnePetro.

  • Salimi, A, Rostami, J, and Moorman, C. (2017) Evaluating the suitability of existing rock mass classification systems for TBM performance prediction by using a regression tree.” In: ISRM European Rock Mechanics Symposium-EUROCK 2017, OnePetro.

  • Sanio, HP. (1985) Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropic rock. In: Internat. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech., Abstracts, Elsevier, pp.153–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)93229-2

  • Sapigni, M., Berti, M., Bethaz, E., Busillo, A. and Cardone, G. (2002) TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications. Internat. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v.39(6), pp.771–788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00069-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuro, K, and Plinninger, R. J. (2003) Hard rock tunnel boring, cutting, drilling and blasting: rock parameters for excavatability. In: 10th ISRM Congress, OnePetro.

  • Wickham, G, and Tiedemann, H. (1974) Ground support prediction model (RSR concept). Jacobs Associates INC San Francisco CA.

  • Yagiz, S, Gokceoglu, C, Sezer, E, and Iplikci, S. (2009) Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance. Engg. Appl. Artificial Intelligence, v.22(4–5), pp.808–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2009.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagiz, S. (2003) Development of rock fracture and brittleness indices to quantify the effects of rock mass features and toughness in the csm model basic penetration for hard rock tunnelling machines. Doctoral Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines.

  • Yagiz, S. (2008) Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, v.23(3), pp.326–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440010, India

    D. Kullarkar Shubham & N. R. Thote

Authors
  1. D. Kullarkar Shubham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. R. Thote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. Kullarkar Shubham or N. R. Thote.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kullarkar Shubham, D., Thote, N.R. Development of Performance Prediction Model for TBM Using Rock Mass Properties. J Geol Soc India 99, 783–790 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2385-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2385-y

Search

Navigation