Skip to main content
Log in

A Historical Overview of Conceptual Approaches in Mineral Exploration with Special Reference to Uranium Exploration in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Minerals and metals find mentioned in India’s ‘Shruthies’ (Vedic) and ‘Smruthies’ (Ithihasas and Puranas) but the exploration concepts had remained latent. After a huge hiatus, the Industrial Revolution of the mid-18th century can be said to have heralded the need to seek mineral resources world-wide. Ancient mining activities were the obvious precursors used by the prospectors to seek new mineral resources. The ‘Spatial and Temporal’ association of the ‘metallogenic provinces’ thus also became clearer. The ‘mineral system concept’ came up since 1990s and are being used for seeking new Mississipi Valley Type, Pb−Zn−Cu and SEDAX type deposits along passive, continental margins. The ‘Common Earth Model’ came up in the new millenia for petroleum exploration with inferences on the depth aspects petroleum basins. Such a fusion of concepts and advanced exploration techniques have helped in the preparation of ‘prospectivity maps’ for seeking ‘green field terrains’ to discover new mineral resource bases. The second world-war which demonstrated the fission-power of uranium ushered in the race for atomic minerals, especially uranium, throughout the world including India. Crustal evolution and the time-bound character of specific uranium deposit-types marked a major shift in uranium exploration concepts world-wide including India. Metamorphic, vein type deposits of Singhbhum, Jharkhand (Jaduguda, Narwapaharh, Turamdih and others explored since the early 1950s), the sandstone types at Domiasiat and Wakhyn in Meghalaya, the albitite-hosted uranium at Rohil, Rajasthan and the unique, low-grade, large tonnage, carbonate-hosted Tummallapalle group of deposits in Andhra Pradesh discovered and proved since the late 1970s, form the main resource base of uranium in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, D. K. and Sreenivas, B. (2020) An appraisal of uranium deposits of India and their style of deposition with reference to the Paleoproterozoic great oxidation event. Internat. Geol. Rev., doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2020.1728583.

  • Bateman, A.M. (1942) Economic Mineral Deposits. John Wiley and Sons, Ney York, London. 453p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W., Gedeon, T., and Barnes, R. (2000) The Use of a Multilayer Feed forward Neural Network for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Austra. Jour. Earth Sci., doi.:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-0952.2000.00807).

  • Brown, M., Johnson, T. and Gardiner, N. (2020) Plate Tectonics and the Archean Earth. Earth Planet. Sci., v.48, pp.291–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneton, P. and Cuney, M. (2016) Geology of Uranium Deposits. In: Hore-Lacy (Ed.), Uranium for Nuclear Power. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, no.93, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.11–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cawood, P.A. and Hawkesworth, C.J., (2015) Temporal relations between mineral deposits and global tectonic cycles: Ore Depos. An Evolution Earth. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ., v.393, pp.9–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1144/SP393.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, K., Ecka, N.R.R., Mishra, B., Ramesh Babu, P.V., and Parihar, P.S. (2011) Paleoproterozoic quartz-pebble conglomerate type uranium mineralisation in Mankarhachua area, Angul district, Orissa. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.77, pp.443–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuney, B. (2010) Evolution of Uranium Fractionation Processes through Time: Driving the Secular Variation of Uranium Deposit Types. Econ. Geol., v.105(3), pp.553–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, P. T. (1987) The early history of zinc. Endeavour N. S. v.11(4), pp.183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlkamp, F.J. (2009) Uranium Deposits of the world. Asia, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, 493p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, S.M. (2016) Challenges and Emerging Trends in Mineral Exploration. Geol. Soc. India, Spl. Pub., no.4, pp.1–13.

  • Gatinskii, G.Y. and Rundkvist, D.V. (2003) Mesozoic-Cenozoic metallogenic provinces, Wilson cycle, and plume tectonics. Russ. Jour. Earth Sci., v.5, pp.31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, D.I. (2008) Guest (Ed) Conceptual mineral exploration. Austr. Jour. Earth Sci., v.55, pp.1–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090701673310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann S.G. and Cassidy K.F. (2000) Archaean orogenic lode gold deposits. In: Hagemann S.G. & Brown P.E. (Eds.), Gold in 2000. Rev. Econ. Geol., v.13, pp.9–68.

  • Hornsky, J.M.A. and Groves, D.I. (2008) Science of targeting: definition, strategies, targetingand performance measurement. Austr. Jour. Earth Sci., v.55(1), pp.3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090701581356)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2016) World distribution of Uranium Deposits (UDEPO) IAEA — TECDOC 1843. 247p.

  • Khedkar, V.R. (1951) Report on the iso-radsurvey and prospecting for uranium in the belt of uraniferous rocks in Singhbhum district, Bihar. Field Season Report for (1950–51) RMSU (AEC) Unpublished.

  • Krishnamurthy, P. (2006) The saga of Singhbhum uranium discoveries and exploration. Centenary Volume. Transc. Mining, Geolological and Metallurgical Inst. (MGMI) of India, v.102, pp.151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, P. (1996) Are Early-Middle Proterozoic unconformity-related uranium deposits unique to Australia and Canada: an appraisal with special reference to India. Explor. Res. At. Mineals, v.9, pp.1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, P., Chaki, A., Sinha R.M., and Singh, S.N. (1988) Geology, geochemistry and genesis of metabasalts, meta rhyolites and the associated uranium mineralisation at Bodal, Rajnandgaon District, Madhya Pradesh and implications for uranium mineralisation in central India. Explor. Res. At. Mineals., v.1, pp.13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, P., Parihar, P. S., Shrivastava, P.K., Mishra, M.K., Rao, V.V. and Singh, S.N. (1988) Geochemical soil-surveys in uranium exploration: a case study at the Bodal Uranium Prospect and extension areas. Explor. Res. At. Mineals., v.1. pp.139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon, X. (1968) Sea-floor spreading and continental drift. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.73, pp.3661–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, W. (1913) Mineral Deposits. McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 853p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Xiao, K., Sun, L., Li, S., Zi, J., Wang, K., Song, X., Ding, J., and Li, C. (2018) Part I: A resource estimation based on mineral system modelling prospectivity approaches and analogical analysis: A case study of the MVT Pb-Zn deposits in Huayuan district, China. Ore Geol. Rev., v.101, pp.966–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuaig, T.C., Beresford, S.W., and Hornsky, J.M.A. (2010) Translating the mineral systems approach into an effective exploration targeting system. Ore Geol. Rev., v.38, pp.128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, C.J., Whateley, M.K.G. and Evans, A.M. (Eds.) (2006) Introduction to Mineral Exploration. Second Edition, Blackwell Publishing Co., Victoria, Australia. 481p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, E.F.O. (1940) The ancient workers of western Dhalbhum, Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal, v.6(5), pp.70–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykanen, V., Groves, D.I., Ojala, V.J. and Gardoll, S.J. (2008) Combined conceptual/empirical prospectivity mapping for orogenic gold in the northern Fennoscandian Shield, Finland, Aust. Jour. Earth Sci, v.55(1), pp.39–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090701581380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potma, W., Roberts, P.A., Schaubs, P.M., Sheldon, H.A., Zhang, Y., Hobbs, B.E., and Ord, A. (2008) Predictive targeting in Australian orogenic-gold systems at the deposit to district scale using numerical modelling. Aust. Jour. Earth Sci., v.55(1), pp.101–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090701673328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rona, P.A. (1973) Plate Tectonics and Mineral Resources. Scientific American, v.229, pp.86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, A. K., and Krishnamurthy, P. (2008) Uranium metallogeny with special reference to Indian deposits. Trans. Min. Geol. Metall. Inst. India., v.104, pp.19–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, D.B. (1977) A brief note on the geology and occurrence of uranium at Bodal, district Rajnandgaon M.P., Curr. Sci., v.46, 605p.

  • Sinha, K.K., Das, A.K., Sinha, R.M., Upadhyaya, L.D., Pandey, P., and Sha, V.L. (1990) Uranium and associated Copper-Nickel-Molybdenum mineralisation in the Singhbhum shear zone, Bihar, India. Explor. Res. At. Minerals., v.3, pp. 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, R.M., Shrivastava, V.K., Sharma, G.V.G. and Parthasarathy, T.N. (1993) Geological favourability for unconformity-related uranium deposits in northern parts of the Cuddapah basin: evidences from Lambapur uranium occurrence, Andhra Pradesh, India. Explor. Res. At. Minerals, v.8., pp.111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunil Kumar, Rajendra Singh, R. Bahuguna, B. Sengupta, and Ravi Kaul. (1990) Geological environment of sandstone-type uranium deposit, Domiasiat area, West Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India. Explor. Res. At. Minerals., v.3, pp.17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1890) Diamond washing at Golconda, from “A Nutshell of Knowledge Concerning the Mine” by Isaac Taylor, Second Edition, Published by John Harris, London, (1830)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudeva Rao, M. J. C. Nagabhushana, J. C. and Jeyagopal, A.V. (1989). Uranium mineralization in the Middle Proterozoic carbonate rock of the Cuddapah Supergroup, Southern Peninsular India. Explor. Res. At. Minerals, v.2, pp.29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H., Xiao, K., Shao, Y., Kong, H., Zhang, S., Wang, K., Li, Q. and Wen, C. (2020) Modeling-based mineral system approach to prospectivity mapping of strata-bound hydrothermal deposits: A case study of MVT Pb−Zn deposits in the Huayuan area, northwestern Hunan Province, China. Ore Geol. Rev., v.120, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103368

  • Wilson, J. T. (1968) Static or mobile earth: the current scientific revolution. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., v.112, pp.309–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyborn, L. A. I., Heinrich, C.A. and Jaques, A.L. (1994) Australian Proterozoic mineral systems: Essential ingredients and mapable criteria [abs.]. In P. C. Hallenstein (Ed.), Australian mining looks north-The challenges and choices, v.5, pp.109–115. Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Publication Series.14

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is dedicated to the ‘Google Scholar’, which provided either full or partial access to the innumerable contributions of Earth Scientists pertaining to the references cited here sitting at home during the Pandemic. The three reviewers provided excellent inputs to improve the manuscript by positive suggestions and the author is thankful to them. Dr. D.K. Sinha, Director, AMD invited to contribute to Azadi Ke Amruth Mahotsav and also for arranging re-drafting of some diagrams given in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Krishnamurthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnamurthy, P. A Historical Overview of Conceptual Approaches in Mineral Exploration with Special Reference to Uranium Exploration in India. J Geol Soc India 98, 1166–1172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-022-2139-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-022-2139-2

Navigation