Skip to main content
Log in

Direct resistivity measurements of core sample using a portable in-situ DC resistivity meter in comparison with HERT data

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

An indigenous apparatus was devised for measuring the true resistivity of core samples in laboratory or at the drilling site and tested for its efficacy. The true resistivities of selected core samples from a shallow borehole of Brahmaputra alluvium were measured using an in-situ DC resistivity meter and compared with corresponding High-resolution Electrical Resistivity Tomography (HERT) cross section acquired across the borehole site. We find a very good match between the direct measurements and inverse model data of HERT within the limits of resolution. Thus, the present work proves the validity and utility of the resistivity survey in identifying the nature of the sub-surface material and its stratification by measuring the core sample resistivity with the help of in-situ DC resistivity meter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archie, G.E. (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Min., Metall. Pet. Eng. v.146, pp.54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, W.F., Orange, A.S. and Madden, T. R. (1965) The effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of water-saturated crystalline rocks. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.70, pp.5669–5678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelidze, T.L., Gueguen, Y. and Ruffet, C. (1999) Electrical spectroscopy of porous rocks: a review - II. Experimental results and interpretation. Geophys. Jour. Int., v.137, pp.16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collet, L.S. and Katsube, T.J. (1973) Electrical Parameters of Rocks in developing Geophysical Techniques, Geophysics, v.38, pp.76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaselow, A. and Serge, A.S. (2004) Stress sensitivity of elastic moduli and electrical resistivity in porous rocks, Jour. Geophys. Engg., v.1, p.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, R. (2006) Groundwater Geophysics, A tool for hydrogeology, Springer Publishers, ISBN 978-3-540-88405-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna, T. S. (2006) Geophysical Practice in Mineral Exploration and Mapping. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, no.62, 382p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekapalli, R., Sarma, V.S., Padmavathi Devi, P. and Prasad, P.R. (2013) Electrical resistivity imaging over natural (in situ) geological samples using physical model studies. Arabian Jour. Geosci., p.1, doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-1101-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeling, H. (1986) Numerical models on the influence of partial melt on elastic, artelastic and electrical properties of rocks, II, Electrical conductivity, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. v.43, pp.123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinegar, H.J. and Vaxman, M.H. (1984) Induced polarization of shaly sands. Geophysics, v.49, pp.1267–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Rekapalli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rekapalli, R., Sarma, V.S. & Phukon, P. Direct resistivity measurements of core sample using a portable in-situ DC resistivity meter in comparison with HERT data. J Geol Soc India 86, 211–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-015-0300-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-015-0300-x

Keywords

Navigation