Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing grade domain of iron ore deposit using geostatistical modelling: A case study

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Conventional methods of ore deposit estimates are time consuming, whereas geostatistical methods provide quick and reliable estimates with minimum variance. Geostatistical tools, semi-variograms and kriging, have been used for estimation of grades of an iron ore deposit in the present study. In order to model the deposit and estimate grade, 4537 samples collected from 93 boreholes were used in the study. 3-D data have been converted to 2-D for analyzing the variation of Fe within the boreholes. For each borehole, the weighted mean of Fe grade and its coefficient of variation (CV) are calculated and further analysis is carried out for these two variables. Semi-variogram model suggests that the deposit extends over a zone of influence up to 700 m. Grade maps of kriged estimates reveal that the iron ore deposit is distributed in three distinct zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annels, A.E. (1996) Mineral Deposit Evaluation: A Practical Approach. Chapman and Hall, London. 436p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asghari, O., Fatemeh Soltni and Hassan B.A. (2009) The comparison between sequential gaussian simulation (SGS) of Choghart ore deposit and geostatistical estimation through ordinary kriging. Australian Jour. Basic Applied Sci., v.3(1), pp.330–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., Bhattacherjee, A., Samanta, B. and Pal, S.K. (2006) Ore Grade Estimation of a limestone deposit in India using an artificial neural network. Applied GIS, v. 2(1), pp.2.1–2.20. DOI: 10.2014/ag060003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, M. (1977) Geostatistical ore reserve estimation. Developments in Geomathematics. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 283p.

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Vitry, C. (2003) Resource Classification — A case study from the Joffre-hosted Iron Ore of BHP Billition’s Mount Whaleback Operations. Jour. Mining Tech., Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Assoc., v.112, pp.185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deraisme, J. and Fouquet, C. (1996) The Geostatistical Approach for Reserves. Mining Magazine. May 1996, pp.2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, X. and Ortiz, J.M. (2005) Estimation and mineral resources using grade domains: critical analysis and a suggested methodology. Jour. South African Inst. Min. Metall., v.105, pp.247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glacken, I.M. and Snowden, D.V. (2001) Mineral resources estimation. In: A.C. Edwards (Ed.), Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation-the Aus. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy guide to good practice. pp.189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guibal, D. (1987) Recoverable reserves estimation of an Australian gold deposit in geostatistical case studies. Reidel Publishing Company, pp.149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassani, Pak, A.A. (2005) Exploration Data Analysis. Tehran University Press, pp.642–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. and Marechal, A. (1979) Recoverable Reserves estimated by Disjunctive Kriging. Proc. 16th APCOM Symposium, pp.240–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige, D.G. (1996a) A basic perspective on the roles of classical statistics, data search routines, conditional biases and information and smoothing effects in ore block valuations. In: Proc. Conf. on Mining Geostatistics. Kruger National Park, South Africa, pp.1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige, D.G. (1996b) A practical analysis of the effects of spatial structure and data available and accessed, on conditional biases in ordinary kriging. In: E.Y. Baafi and N.A. Schofield (Eds.), Proc. Fifth Intl. Geostat. Congress, Geostatistics Wollongong’ 96, pp.799–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzeihe, S K., Hassan, M., Hossein, H. and Parvizz, M. (2013) Determining the best search neighbourhood in reserve estimation, using geostatistical method: A case study anomaly No. 12A iron deposit in central Iran. J. Geol. Soc. of India, v.81, pp. 581–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. (1963) Principles of Geostatistics. Econ. Geol., v.58, pp.1246–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, A., Mondal, R.P., Rajeevwadhwa and Prabhakhar, G. (2010) Disposition of banded iron formation of Bailadila Range, South Bastar Dantewada Dist., Chhattisgarh: Its implications on exploration. Jour.Appld. Geochem., v. 12(3), pp.469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, P.S.N. (1989) Some Aspects of the Selection of Block size and Neighborhood in Kriging — A case Study, IM & EJ, September Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard, J. (1987) Two key parameters when choosing the kriging neighbourhood. Mathematical Geol., v.19(8), pp.851–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, B.C. and Roy, I. (2005) A Geostatistical approach to resource evaluation of Kala iron ore Deposit, Sundergarh Dist., Orissa. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.65(5), pp.553–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vann, J., Jackson, S. and Bertoli, O. (2003) Quantitative kriging neighbourhood analysis for the mining geologist — A description of the method with worked case examples. 5th Intl. Mining Geol. Conf., Bendigo, Vic., pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Narayana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kameshwara Rao, V., Rao, C.R. & Narayana, A.C. Assessing grade domain of iron ore deposit using geostatistical modelling: A case study. J Geol Soc India 83, 549–554 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-014-0082-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-014-0082-6

Keywords

Navigation