Skip to main content
Log in

A model of debris flow forecast based on the water-soil coupling mechanism

  • Published:
Journal of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris flow forecast is an important means of disaster mitigation. However, the accuracy of the statistics-based debris flow forecast is unsatisfied while the mechanism-based forecast is unavailable at the watershed scale because most of existing researches on the initiation mechanism of debris flow took a single slope as the main object. In order to solve this problem, this paper developed a model of debris flow forecast based on the water-soil coupling mechanism at the watershed scale. In this model, the runoff and the instable soil caused by the rainfall in a watershed is estimated by the distributed hydrological model (GBHM) and an instable identification model of the unsaturated soil. Because the debris flow is a special fluid composed of soil and water and has a bigger density, the density estimated by the runoff and instable soil mass in a watershed under the action of a rainfall is employed as a key factor to identify the formation probability of debris flow in the forecast model. The Jiangjia Gulley, a typical debris flow valley with a several debris flow events each year, is selected as a case study watershed to test this forecast model of debris flow. According the observation data of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, CAS located in Jiangjia Gulley, there were 4 debris flow events in 2006. The test results show that the accuracy of the model is satisfied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Bacchini, M., Zannoni, A., 2003. Relations between Rainfall and Triggering Debris-Flow: Case Study of Cancia (Dolomites, Northeastern Italy). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 3: 71–79. doi:10.5194/nhess-3-71-2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berti, M., Simoni, A., 2005. Experimental Evidences and Numerical Modeling of Debris Flow Initiated by Channel Runoff. Landslides, 2: 171–182. doi:10.1007/s10346-005-0062-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caine, N., 1980. The Rainfall Intensity-Duration Control of Shallow Landslides and Debris Flows. Geografiska Annaler, Series A, Physical Geograpy, 62(1-2): 23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. H., 1975. Debris Flow Originating from Soil Slip during Rainstorm in Southern California. Q. Engineering Geologist, 7: 339–349. doi:10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1974.007.04.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z. L., Zhu, P. Y., Liu, L. J., 1998. The Relationship between Debris Flow Activity and Rainfall Intensity. Journal of Natural Disasters, 7(1): 118–120 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cong, Z. T., Yang, D. W., Gao, B., et al., 2009. Hydrological Trend Analysis in the Yellow River Basin Using a Distributed Hydrological Model. Water Resources Research, 45(7): W00A13. doi:10.1029/2008WR006852

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, P., 1991. Experiment Research of the Initial Condition and Mechanism of Debris Flow. Chinese Science Bulletin, (21): 1650–1652 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund, D. G., Rahardjo, H., 1993. Shear Strength Theory. In: Fredlund, D. G., Rahardjo, H., eds., Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. 217–231

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, R. M., LaHusen, R. G., 1989. Dynamic Pore-Pressure Fluctuations in Rapidly Shearing Granular Materials. Science, 246(4931): 796–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, R. M., Reid, M. E., LaHusen, R. G., 1997. Debris-Flow Mobilization from Landslides. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet, 25: 85–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Z. C., Li, Z. F., Ma, N. N., et al., 2004. Debris Flow Research in China. In: Kang, Z. C., Li, Z. F., Ma, N. N., et al., eds., Debris Flow Research in China. Science Press, Beijing. 21–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Z. C., Cui, P., Wei, F. Q., et al., 2006. Data Collection of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, CAS (1961-1984). In: Kang, Z. C., Cui, P., Wei, F. Q., eds., Data Collection of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, CAS (1961–1984). Science Press, Beijing. 1–255 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Z. C., Cui, P., Wei, F. Q. et al., 2007. Data Collection of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, CAS (1995–2000). In: Kang, Z. C., Cui, P., Wei, F. Q., eds., Data Collection of Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station, CAS (1995–2000). Science Press, Beijing. 1–226 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H. L., Huang, J. C., Wang, R., et al., 2013. Rainfall Threshold Calculation Method for Debris Flow Pre-Warning in Data-Poor Areas. Journal of Earth Science, 24(5): 854–862. doi:10.1007/s12583-013-0377-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, T., 1978. Mechanical Characteristics of Debris Flow. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 104: 1153–1169

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C., Zhang, S. C., 2008. Study Progress and Expectation for Initiation Mechanism and Prediction of Hydraulic-Driven Debris Flow. Advances in Earth Science, 23(8): 787–793 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten, M. T., 1980. A Closed form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44: 892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F. Q., Tang, J. F., Xie, H., et al., 2004. Debris Flow Forecast Combined Regions and Valleys and Its Application. Journal of Mountain Science, 22(3): 321–325 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F. Q., Gao, K. C., Cui, P., et al., 2006. Method of Debris Flow Prediction Based on a Numerical Weather Forecast and Its Application. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Enviroment, 90: 37–46. doi:102495DEB060041

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F. Q., Gao, K. C., Jiang, Y. H., et al., 2007. GIS-Based Prediction of Debris Flows and Landslides in Southwestern China. In: Chen, C. L., Major, J. J., eds., Proceedings of Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Mill Press, Netherlands. 479–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F. Q., Gao, K. C., Hu, K. H., et al., 2008. Relationships between Debris Flows and Earth Surface Factors in Southwest China. Environ. Geol., 55: 619–627. doi:10.1007/s00254-007-1012-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. C., Jayko, A. S., 1997. Preliminary Maps Showing Rainfall Thresholds for Debris-Flow Activity, San Francisco by Region, California. U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 97-745 F

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. J., 2007. Application of a Distributed Hydrological Model of Yangtze River Basin: [Dissertation]. Tsinghua University, Beijing. 58–81 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. W., Herath, S., Musiake, K., 2002. A Hillslope-Based Hydrological Model Using Catchment Area and Width Function. Hyrological Sciences Journal, 47(1): 231–243. doi:10.1080/02626660209492907

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. S., Qiao, F., Cui, P., 2006. The Study on the Numerical Model of Debris Flow on the Slope. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 13(4): 146–149 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, J. Q., Cui, P., Ge, Y. G., et al., 2009. Relationship between Rainfall Characteristics and Total Amount of Debris Flow. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 31(4): 77–83 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangqiang Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Yang, H., Wei, F. et al. A model of debris flow forecast based on the water-soil coupling mechanism. J. Earth Sci. 25, 757–763 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-014-0463-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-014-0463-1

Key Words

Navigation