Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Echocardiographic evaluation methods for right ventricular function

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The right ventricle (RV) was neglected for a long time and has only recently gained attention. RV systolic function important role is now recognized. It is considered a predictor of outcome in many conditions like ischemic heart disease, left heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease and pulmonary embolism. Evaluation of RV systolic function is recommended as part of the standard echocardiography examination; however, this evaluation is still challenging because of the RV complex geometry. Various echocardiographic methods have been developed to evaluate RV systolic function; some of them are recommended for use in clinical practice while others are still considered research tools or have not yet been recommended. In this review article, we discuss current RV systolic function evaluation methods and report their advantages, limitations, abnormality thresholds and recommendations according to the most recently published guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jurcut R, Giusca S, La Gerche A, et al. The echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle: what to do in 2010? Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11(2):81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giovanardi P, Stefanelli G, Turrini F, et al. Interactions between commonly used left and right ventricular function indexes in stable patients. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2014;62(4):335–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Damy T, Viallet C, Lairez O, et al. Comparison of four right ventricular systolic echocardiographic parameters to predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11(9):818–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evangelista A, Flachskampf F, Lancellotti P, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for standardization of performance, digital storage and reporting of echocardiographic studies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(4):438–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai WW, Gauvreau K, Rivera ES, et al. Accuracy of guideline recommendations for two-dimensional quantification of the right ventricle by echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24(7):691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anavekar NS, Skali H, Bourgoun M, et al. Usefulness of right ventricular fractional area change to predict death, heart failure, and stroke following myocardial infarction (from the VALIANT ECHO Study). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(5):607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1984;107(3):526–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopez-Candales A, Dohi K, Rajagopalan N, et al. Defining normal variables of right ventricular size and function in pulmonary hypertension: an echocardiographic study. Postgrad Med J. 2008;84(987):40–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forfia PR, Fisher MR, Mathai SC, et al. Tricuspid annular displacement predicts survival in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(9):1034–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giusca S, Dambrauskaite V, Scheurwegs C, et al. Deformation imaging describes right ventricular function better than longitudinal displacement of the tricuspid ring. Heart. 2010;96(4):281–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(1):3–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodrigues AC, Cordovil A, Monaco CG, et al. Assessing prognosis of pulmonary embolism using tissue-Doppler echocardiography and brain natriuretic peptide. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013;11(3):338–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, et al. Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(6):838–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anconina J, Danchin N, Selton-Suty C, et al. Non invasive estimation of right ventricular dp/dt in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71(16):1495–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein PD, Sabbah HN, Anbe DT, et al. Performance of the failing and nonfailing right ventricle of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1979;44(6):1050–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al. Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(1):10–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crean AM, Maredia N, Ballard G, et al. 3D Echo systematically underestimates right ventricular volumes compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adult congenital heart disease patients with moderate or severe RV dilatation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindqvist P, Henein M, Kazzam E. Right ventricular outflow-tract fractional shortening: an applicable measure of right ventricular systolic function. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003;4(1):29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi M, Tsuruda T, Watanabe Y, et al. Reduced fractional shortening of right ventricular outflow tract is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11(1):19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alsoos F, Almobarak M, Shebli H. Right ventricular outflow tract systolic excursion: a useful method for determining right ventricular systolic function. J Echocardiogr. 2014;12(4):151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asmer I, Adawi S, Ganaeem M, et al. Right ventricular outflow tract systolic excursion: a novel echocardiographic parameter of right ventricular function. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(10):871–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez-Candales A, Edelman K. Right ventricular outflow tract systolic excursion: a distinguishing echocardiographic finding in acute pulmonary embolism. Echocardiography. 2013;30:649–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Starling MR, Crawford MH, Sorensen SG, et al. A new two-dimensional echocardiographic technique for evaluating right ventricular size and performance in patients with obstructive lung disease. Circulation. 1982;66(3):612–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kjaergaard J, Snyder EM, Hassager C, et al. Impact of preload and afterload on global and regional right ventricular function and pressure: a quantitative echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(5):515–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Duan YY, Harada K, Toyono M, et al. Effects of acute preload reduction on myocardial velocity during isovolumic contraction and myocardial acceleration in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27(1):32–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tugcu A, Guzel D, Yildirimturk O, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome without hypertension. Cardiology. 2009;113(3):184–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sade LE, Ozin B, Ulus T, et al. Right ventricular contractile reserve in mitral stenosis: implications on hemodynamic burden and clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol. 2009;135(2):193–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Farhood Alsoos and Ali Khaddam declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human/animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Fayez Mansour Street, Mazzeh, Damascus, Syria

    Farhood Alsoos & Ali Khaddam

Authors
  1. Farhood Alsoos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Khaddam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhood Alsoos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alsoos, F., Khaddam, A. Echocardiographic evaluation methods for right ventricular function. J Echocardiogr 13, 43–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-015-0243-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-015-0243-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation