Abstract
Based on recent research activities, the cost of the propellant may represent up to the 90% of the Direct Operating Cost for a hypersonic vehicle. Therefore, it can be considered the most relevant cost item of the overall Life Cycle Cost. In this context, the paper focuses on the estimation of the cost of liquid hydrogen, one of the most promising fuels for high-speed applications, considering its specific energy content. In particular, a methodology is here presented to guide engineers through the evaluation of the impact of the LH2 price on Direct Operating Cost and then onto the overall Life Cycle Cost for a long-haul point-to-point transportation system. Starting from an overview of the current H2 productive scenarios, future possible technological improvements allowing an increment of the production rate and a reduction of the related socio-economic impact are described. Then, a detailed cost-estimation model is presented for the so-called “green” hydrogen. Eventually, the developed cost model is applied to the LAPCAT A2 and LAPCAT MR2.4 vehicles and mission concepts, demonstrating that in a future scenario (2050) the LH2 cost can be lowered down to 2 €/kg. With this fuel price, the share of fuel cost onto Direct Operating Cost can be reduced down to 70%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CCUS:
-
Carbon capture utilization and storage
- CAPEX:
-
Capital cost expenditures
- CER:
-
Cost estimation relationship
- CFRP:
-
Carbon fibre reinforced polymer
- CH4 :
-
Methane
- CMC:
-
Ceramic matrix composites
- CO:
-
Carbon monoxide
- CO2 :
-
Carbon dioxide
- CPI:
-
Consumer price index
- DOC:
-
Direct operating cost
- ESA:
-
European space agency
- ESFC:
-
Energy-specific fuel consumption
- EU:
-
European Union
- EEX:
-
Electricity expenditures
- FY:
-
Fiscal year
- GTOW:
-
Gross take-off weight
- IEA:
-
International energy agency
- H2O:
-
Water
- IOC:
-
Indirect operating cost
- LCC:
-
Life cycle cost
- LCOH:
-
Levelized cost of hydrogen
- LH2 :
-
Liquid hydrogen
- LHV:
-
Lower heating value
- PEM:
-
Proton exchange membrane
- NOx :
-
Nitrogen oxides
- OPEX:
-
Operational expenditures
- RDTE:
-
Research, development, test and evaluation
- REL:
-
Reaction engines limited
- ROM:
-
Rough order of magnitude
- SSTO:
-
Single stage to orbit
- SOEC:
-
Solid oxide electrolysis cells
References
Contreras, A., et al.: Hydrogen as aviation fuel: a comparison with hydrocarbon fuels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 22(10-11), 1053–1060 (1997)
Witcofski, R.: Comparison of alternative fuel for aircraft. NASA-TM-80155 (1979) https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790024466.pdf
Margaretic, P., Steelant, J.: Economical assessment of commerical high-speed transport. CEAS Aeronaut. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0319-y
Steelant, J.: Achievements obtained on Aero-Thermal Loaded Materials for High-Speed Atmospheric Vehicles within ATLLAS. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Bremen, AIAA-2009-7225, 19–22 October 2009
Steelant, J., Dalenbring, M., Kuhn, M., Bouchez, M., von Wolfersdorf, J.: Achievements obtained within the ATLLAS-II Project on Aero-Thermal Loaded Material Investigations for High-Speed Vehicles. In: 21st Int. Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technology Conference, Xiamen, AIAA-2017-2393, 6–9 March 2017
Steelant, J.: Achievements Obtained for Sustained Hypersonic Flight within the LAPCAT project. In: 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, AIAA-2008-2578, 28 April–1 May 2008
Steelant, J., Varvill, R., Walton, C., Defoort, S., Hannemann, K., Marini, M.: Achievements Obtained for Sustained Hypersonic Flight within the LAPCAT-II project. In: 20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference AIAA, Glasgow, AIAA-2015-3677, 6–9 July 2015
Steelant, J.: Evolutionary technology developments towards an international flight platform for high-speed transportation, aviation in Europe innovating for growth. In: Knörzer, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th European Aeronautics Days, London, 20–22 Oct 2015. https://doi.org/10.2777/62810
Fusaro, R., Viola, N., Ferretto, D., et al.: Life cycle cost estimation for high-speed transportation systems. CEAS Space J (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-019-00291-7
Koelle, D.E.: Handbook of Cost Engineering and Design of Space Transportation Systems. Revision 4b. (2013)
Léon, A., ed. Hydrogen technology: mobile and portable applications. Springer Science & Business Media (2008)
Schoots, K., et al.: Learning curves for hydrogen production technology: an assessment of observed cost reductions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33(11), 2630–2645 (2008)
Adolf, J., Balzer, C.H., Louis, J., Schabla, U., Fischedick, M., Arnold, K., Schüwer, D.: Energy of the future? Sustainable mobility through fuel cells and H2; Shell hydrogen study (2017)
Verstraete, D.: The potential of Liquid Hydrogen for long range aircraft propulsion, chap. 1, pp. 2–10. Ph.D. Thesis (2009). https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1826/4089/D_Verstraete_Thesis_2009.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Pohl, H.-W. (ed.): Hydrogen and other alternative fuels for air and ground transportation. Wiley, Chichester (1995)
Hadaller, O., Daggett, D., Hendricks, R., Walther, R.: Alternative Fuels and Their Potential Impact on Aviation. NASA/TM—2006-214365 (2006) https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060051881.pdf
van Hulst, N.: Hydrogen Envoy at the Ministry of Economic Affairs & Climate Policy of the Netherlands Commentary “The clean hydrogen future has already begun” (2019)
IRENA. Hydrogen from renewable power: technology outlook for the energy transition (2018). https://www.eugcc-cleanergy.net/sites/default/files/1._session_1_dr._asami_miketa_irena.pdf
IRENA, Renewable power generation costs in 2018. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi (2019). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/May/IRENA_Renewable-Power-Generations-Costs-in-2018.pdf
Rashid, M.M., et al.: Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: a review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high temperature water electrolysis. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 4(3), 2249–8958 (2015)
Ragheb, M.: Economics of wind power generation. Wind Energy Engineering, pp. 537–555. Academic Press (2017)
IEA Database: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/hydrogen-production-costs-using-natural-gas-in-selected-regions-2018-2
Bertuccioli, L., et al.: Study on development of water electrolysis in the EU. Final report. Fuel cells and hydrogen joint undertaking, 160 p (2014)
Capros, P, et al.: EU Reference Scenario 2016-Energy, transport and GHG emissions Trends to 2050 (2016)
Riis, T.: et al.: Hydrogen production and storage—R&D priorities and gaps. In: International Energy Agency-Hydrogen Co-Ordination Group-Hydrogen Implementing Agreement (2006)
Schmidt, O., et al.: Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42(52), 30470–30492 (2017)
Cardella, U., Decker L., Klein H.: Economically viable large-scale hydrogen liquefaction. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol. 171. no. 1. IOP Publishing (2017)
Norwegian Centres of Expertise (NCE): Norwegian Future Value Chains for Liquid Hydrogen, NCE Maritime CleanTech (2019). https://maritimecleantech.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Report-liquid-hydrogen.pdf
Ohlig, K., Decker, L.: The latest developments and outlook for hydrogen liquefaction technology. In: AIP conference proceedings. vol. 1573. no. 1. American Institute of Physics (2014)
Krewitt, W., Schmid, S.: Fuel cell technologies and hydrogen production/distribution options. EU-Project CASCADE Mints Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft-und Raumfahrt, Stuttgart (2005)
Department of Energy (DOE): Hydrogen and fuel program record: Current status off Hydrogen liquefaction cost (2019). https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/19001_hydrogen_liquefaction_costs.pdf
Brewer, G.D.: Hydrogen aircraft technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1991)
Schmidt, P., Stiller, C.: Airport Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure for Aircraft Auxiliary Power Units. In: 18th World Hydrogen Energy Conference (WHEC 2010), Essen (2010)
IRENA: Hydrogen: A Renewable Energy Perspective (2019). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Sep/IRENA_Hydrogen_2019.pdf
Panfilov, M.: Underground and pipeline hydrogen storage. Compendium of Hydrogen Energy, pp. 91–115. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-362-1.00004-3
DNV, GL.: erkenning waterstofinfrastructuur. DNV-GL, November (2017)
Steelant J.: Sustained Hypersonic Flight in Europe: Technology Drivers for LAPCAT II’. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic System Technologies Conference. Bremen, AIAA 2009–7240 (2009)
Repic, E.M., Olson, G.A., Milliken, R.J.: A Methodology for Hypersonic Transport Technology Planning. NASA CR-2286 (1973)
Langener, T., et al.: Layout and design verification of a small scale scramjet combustion chamber. In: 21st International Symposium on Air breathing Engine. ISABE-2013-1655 (2013)
REL: Cost analysis of Configuration A2 vehicle and Scimitar engine. Deliverable. D2.1.4. (2006)
Minwoo, L.E.E., Larry, K.B., Wenbin, S.O.N.G.: Analysis of direct operating cost of wide-body passenger aircraft: A parametric study based on Hong Kong. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 32(5), 1222–1243 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fusaro, R., Vercella, V., Ferretto, D. et al. Economic and environmental sustainability of liquid hydrogen fuel for hypersonic transportation systems. CEAS Space J 12, 441–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-020-00311-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-020-00311-x