Abstract
This paper presents an innovative methodology and tool developed by Politecnico di Torino and the European Space Agency (ESA) to support life cycle cost (LCC) estimation for high-speed transportation systems. This ad hoc built-in tool aims at supporting engineers in cost estimations during conceptual and preliminary design phases. This includes the evaluation of research, development, test and evaluation costs (RDTE costs), production costs as well as direct and indirect operating costs (DOC and IOC). Eventually, the results of the LCC evaluation for two different high-speed transport vehicles is provided and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AEA:
-
Association of European Airlines
- APU:
-
Auxiliary power unit
- ATA:
-
Air Transport Association of America
- ATR:
-
Air turbo rocket
- AVIO:
-
Avionic system
- CAV:
-
Cruise and acceleration vehicle
- CER:
-
Cost estimation relationship
- CpF:
-
Cost per flight
- DMR:
-
Dual mode ramjet
- DOC:
-
Direct operating cost
- DOC + I:
-
Direct operating costs + interest
- Dr:
-
Driver parameter
- ECS:
-
Environmental control system
- ELV:
-
Expendable launch vehicle
- EPS:
-
Electrical power system
- EU:
-
European Union
- FAA:
-
Federal Aviation Administration
- FCS:
-
Flight control system
- FPS:
-
Fire protection system
- FUEL:
-
Fuel system
- FY:
-
Fiscal year
- GUI:
-
Graphical user interface
- HYD:
-
Hydraulic system
- HST:
-
Hypersonic transport
- IATA:
-
International Air Transport Association
- IPS:
-
Ice protection system
- ICAO:
-
International Civil Aviation Organization
- INT:
-
Integration
- IOC:
-
Indirect operating costs
- LAPCAT:
-
Long-term advanced propulsion concepts and technologies
- LCC:
-
Life cycle cost
- LDG:
-
Landing gear
- LH2 :
-
Liquid hydrogen
- LR:
-
Launch rate
- NASA:
-
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- OEW:
-
Operating empty weight
- PBS:
-
Product breakdown structure
- RDTE:
-
Research, development, test and evaluation
- REL:
-
Reaction Engines Limited
- RJ:
-
Ramjet
- RLV:
-
Reusable launch vehicle
- SI:
-
International System of Units
- STRUCT:
-
Structure
- TFU:
-
Theoretical first unit
- TJ:
-
Turbojet
- TOC:
-
Total operating cost
- TP:
-
Technology parameter
- TPS:
-
Thermal protection system
- US:
-
United States
- VEMS:
-
Vehicle energy management system
- WBS:
-
Work breakdown structure
- WYr:
-
Work-year
References
Roskam, J.: Airplane design, part VIII: airplane cost estimation: design, development, manufacturing and operating. DARCorporation, Lawrence (KS) (1990)
Hirschel, E.H.: Basics of aerothermodynamics. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Steelant, J.: LAPCAT: high-speed propulsion technology. In: Advances on propulsion technology for high-speed aircraft. RTO-AVT-VKI Lecture Series, pp. 12–1–12–38. Rhode Saint Genèse (BE) (2008)
Steelant, J.: Sustained hypersonic flight in Europe: technology drivers for LAPCAT II. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, p. 7240. Bremen (DE) (2009)
Koelle, D.E.: Handbook of cost engineering and design of space transportation systems (Revision 4b). TRANSCOST Systems, Ottobrunn (DE) (2013)
ATA: Standard method of estimating comparative direct operating costs of turbine powered transport. Washington, DC (1967)
AEA: Association of european airlines: Short-Medium range aircraft—AEA requirements, G(T)5656, Brüssel (BE) (1989)
Liebeck, R.H., et al.: Advanced subsonic airplane design and economic studies. NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland (OH) (1995)
Repic, E.M., et al.: A methodology for hypersonic transport technology planning. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton (VA) (1973)
Raymer, D.: Aircraft design: a conceptual approach. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., Reston (VA) (2012)
Petersen, R.H., Waters, M.H.: Hypersonic transports-economics and environmental effects. NASA Advanced Concepts and Missions Division, Moffet t Field (CA) (1972)
FAA: Economic values for FAA investment and regulatory decisions, a guide. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/benefit_cost/media/ECONOMICVALUESFORFAAINVESTMENTANDREGULATORYDECISIONS10032007.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2019
Larson, W.J., Wertz, J.R.: Space mission analysis and design. Microcosm, Inc., Torrance (1992)
Fusaro, R., Ferretto, D., Vercella, V., Viola, N., Steelant, J., Fernandez Villace, V.: LCC estimation methodology for hypersonic transportation systems. ICAS 2018, Belo Horizonte (2018)
Varvill, R., Bond, A.: Cost analysis of configuration a2 vehicle and scimitar engine. In: Long-term advanced propulsion concept and technologies (LAPCAT) Deliverable, D.2.1.4. Reaction Engines Ltd., Abingdon (UK) (2006)
Vercella, V., Ferretto, D., Fusaro, R., Viola, N., Fernandez Villace V., Steelant J.: Towards future LH2 productive scenarios: economic assessment and environmental effects on hypersonic transportation systems. In: Conference on High-speed vehicle science and technology (HiSST). Moscow (RU) (2018)
Gulliver, B.S., Finger, G.W.: Spaceport infrastructure cost trends. In: AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition, p. 4397. San Diego (CA) (2014)
Spaceport America Website. https://www.spaceportamerica.com/
Finger, G., et al.: Aerospaceports-economic and schedule guidelines. In: 9th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference (ATIO) and aircraft noise and emissions reduction symposium (ANERS). Hilton Head (SC) (2006)
Webber, D.: The new commercial spaceports. In: Space 2004 conference and exhibit, p. 5860. San Diego (CA) (2004)
Penn, J.P., Lindley, C.A.: Requirements and approach for a space tourism launch system. Acta Astronaut. 52(1), 49–75 (2003)
Margaretic, P., Steelant, J.: Economical assessment of commercial high-speed transport. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 9(4), 747–764 (2018)
Ferjan, K.: IATA Airline operational cost task force (AOCTF). IATA, Geneva (CH) (2013)
Airline Operating Costs and Productivity. https://www.icao.int/MID/Documents/2017/Aviation%20Data%20and%20Analysis%20Seminar/PPT3%20-%20Airlines%20Operating%20costs%20and%20productivity.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2019
Steelant, J., et al.: Achievements obtained for sustained hypersonic flight within the LAPCAT-II project. In: 20th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies, p. 3677. Glasgow (UK) (2015)
Bond, A.: Turbine-Based combined cycles, advances on propulsion technology for high-speed Aircraft. RTO-AVT-VKI Lecture series, Rhode Saint Genèse (BE) (2007)
Steelant, J., van Duijn, M.: Structural analysis of the LAPCAT-MR2 waverider based vehicle. In: 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, p. 2336. San Francisco (CA) (2011)
Roncioni, P., Natale, P., Marini, M., Langener, T., Steelant, J.: Numerical simulations and performance assessment of a scramjet powered cruise vehicle at Mach 8. J. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 42, 218–228 (2015)
Vellaramkalayil, J. J., et al.: Injector layout optimization for the LAPCAT MR2 mach 8 cruiser. In: Space Propulsion Conference 2012 (AAAF-ESANES). Bordeaux (FR) (2012)
Langener, T., et al.: Design and optimization of a small scale M = 8 scramjet propulsion system. In: Space Propulsion 2012 (AAAF-ESANES). Bordeaux (FR) (2012)
Langener, T., Steelant, J., Roncioni, P., Natale, P., Marini, M.: Preliminary performance analysis of the LAPCAT-MR2 by means of nose-to-tail computations. In: 18th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France, AIAA-2012-5872 (2012)
Meerts, C., Steelant, J.: Air intake design for the acceleration propulsion unit of the LAPCAT MR2 hypersonic aircraft. In: 5th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS), Munich, Germany (2013)
Steelant, J., Langener, T.: The LAPCAT-MR2 hypersonic cruiser concept, ICAS-2014-0428. In: 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, St. Petersburg (2014)
Ferretto, D., Vercella, V., Fusaro, R., Viola, N., Fernandez-Villace, V., Steelant, J.: Preliminary design and sizing of the thermal and energy management subsystem for LAPCAT MR2. In: 1st International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science and Technology (HiSST), Moscow, Russia (2018)
Vandervelden, A.: An economic model for evaluating high-speed aircraft designs. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field (CA) (1989)
IATA Industry Economic Performance Statistics December (2018). https://www.iata.org/publications/economics/Reports/Industry-Econ-Performance/Airline-Industry-Economic-Performance-December-18-Datatables.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Appendix 1: Summary of TRANSCOST-modified CERs implemented in HyCost tool
1.1.1 RDTE costs
See Table 15.
High-speed advanced aircraft
$$ H_{\text{VA}} = 2169M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.262} f_{1} f_{2} f_{3} f_{8} f_{10}^{'} f_{11} . $$Turbojet
$$ H_{\text{ET}}^{ '} = \left( {232.4M_{{\text{E}}_\text{dry}}^{0.509} + 1.12v} \right)f_{1} f_{3} . $$Ramjet
$$ H_{\text{ER}} = 355M_{{\text{E}}_\text{dry}}^{0.295} f_{1} f_{3} . $$Combined cycle engine
$$ H_{\text{CCE}} = C_{\text{complexity}} (k_{\text{TJ}} H_{\text{ET}}^{'} + k_{\text{RJ}} H_{\text{ER}} )f_{1} f_{3} . $$Fuel system
$$ S_{{{\text{Fuel}}_{\text{dev}} }} = \left( {0.1M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.68} + 0.49M_{{\text{E}}_\text{dry}}^{0.51} } \right)f_{1} f_{3} . $$TPS
$$ S_{{{\text{TPS}}_{\text{dev}} }} = \left( {0.56M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.59} + 1.8q^{0.51} } \right)f_{1} f_{3} . $$TEMS
$$ S_{{{\text{TEMS}}_{\text{dev}} }} = \left( {5.73M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.26} + 0.8P^{0.17} + 0.53\dot{m}_{{_{{{\text{BO}}_{\text{LH2}} }} }}^{0.19} } \right)f_{1} f_{3} . $$Total development cost
$$ C_{\text{TOT}} = f_{0} (H_{\text{VA}} + \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{{n_{E} }} H_{\text{Ei}} )f_{6} f_{7} . $$
1.1.2 Production cost
See Table 16.
High-speed advanced aircraft
$$ F_{\text{VF}}^{'} = \left( {0.34M_{\text{TOEW}}^{1.75} + 7.06v_{k}^{0.4} } \right)f_{10}^{'} . $$Turbojet
$$ F_{\text{ET}}^{'} = 2.29M_{{{\text{E}}_{\text{dry}} }}^{0.530} + 0.50v^{0.60} . $$Ramjet
$$ F_{\text{ER}} = 5.63T^{0.35} . $$Combined cycle engine
$$ F_{\text{CCE}} = C_{\text{complexity}} (k_{\text{TJ}} F_{\text{ET}}^{ '} + k_{\text{RJ}} F_{\text{ER}} ). $$Fuel system
$$ S_{{{\text{Fuel}}_{\text{prod}} }} = 0.48M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.38} + 0.5M_{{{\text{E}}_{\text{dry}} }}^{0.39} . $$TPS
$$ S_{{{\text{TPS}}_{\text{prod}} }} = 0.51M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.19} + 3.41q^{0.12} + 0.68Q^{0.11} . $$TEMS
$$ S_{{{\text{TEMS}}_{\text{prod}} }} = 5.41M_{\text{OEW}}^{0.23} + 0.79P^{0.15} + 0.52\dot{m}_{{{\text{BO}}_{{{\text{LH}}2}} }}^{0.19} . $$Total production cost
$$ C_{F} = f_{0}^{\prime N} \left( {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {F_{{V_{i} }} } f_{{4_{i} }} + \sum\limits_{j}^{{n_{e} }} {F_{{E_{j} }} } f_{{4_{j} }} } \right)f_{9} . $$
1.2 Appendix 2: Summary of NASA-modified ATA CERs implemented in HyCost tool
1.2.1 Fuel cost (DOCf)
The fuel cost per ton-mile in SI units is:
where \( C_{f} \) is the cost of fuel per unit mass (in kg); \( m_{\text{GTO}} \) is the gross take-off mass; \( m_{\text{PL}} \) is the payload mass; \( K_{R} \) is the reserve fuel fraction [%]. \( R_{T} \) is the range in kilometers.
1.2.2 Crew cost (DOCC)
The crew cost per ton-mile in SI units is:
where \( V_{\text{CR}} \) is the cruise speed; \( V_{\text{B}} \) is the block speed; M is the cruise Mach.
1.2.3 Insurance cost (DOCI)
The insurance cost per ton-mile in SI units is:
where IR is the annual insurance rate; \( C_{\text{HST}} \) is the acquisition cost of the aircraft; U is the annual utilization in block hours/year.
1.2.4 Depreciation cost (DOCD)
The depreciation cost per ton-mile in SI units is:
where \( C_{\text{TJ}} \) is the cost of the turbojet engines; \( C_{\text{RJ}} \) is the cost of the ramjet engines.
1.2.5 Maintenance cost (DOCM)
Maintenance cost is given by the sum of labor and material cost for both airframe and engines. The NASA-modified ATA CERs introduce the following four coefficients to estimate HST maintenance cost for labor and material of both turbojet and ramjet components:
\( K_{\text{LTJ}} \), turbojet maintenance labor ratio (HST turbojets to present subsonic turbojets);
\( K_{\text{MTJ}} \), turbojet maintenance material ratio (HST turbojets to present subsonic turbojets);
\( K_{\text{LRJ}} \), ramjet maintenance labor ratio (HST ramjets to present subsonic turbojets);
\( K_{\text{MRJ}} \), ramjet maintenance material ratio (HST ramjets to present subsonic turbojets).
The following six contributions shall be summed:
- 1.
DOCM/AF/L, maintenance labor effort required for the airframe (cost per ton-mile):
where mAF is the mass of airframe in kilograms, mAV is the mass of avionics in kilograms, mGTO is the maximum take-off mass in kilograms, rL is the average labor rate per hour for all personnel involved in maintenance activities.
- 2.
DOCM/AF/M, maintenance material cost for the airframe (cost per ton-mile):
- 3.
DOCM/TJ/L, maintenance labor effort required for the turbojet engines (cost per ton-mile):
where \( T_{\text{TJ}} \) is the thrust of each turbojet engine in N; tF is the number of flight hours per flight; kTJ is the time of operation of the turbojet engines as a ratio of tF.
- 4.
DOCM/TJ/M, the maintenance material required for the turbojet engines (cost per ton-mile).
- 5.
DOCM/RJ/L, the maintenance labor required for the ramjet engines (cost per ton-mile):
where \( \frac{L}{D} \) is the lift-to-drag ratio.
- 6.
DOCM/RJ/M, the maintenance material cost for ramjet engines (cost per ton-mile):
1.3 Appendix 3: HyCost tool screenshots
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fusaro, R., Viola, N., Ferretto, D. et al. Life cycle cost estimation for high-speed transportation systems. CEAS Space J 12, 213–233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-019-00291-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-019-00291-7