Abstract
Integrated writing skills that emphasize integrated use of language skills and multiple source materials have attracted increasing attention in language education globally and locally in Hong Kong. This study examines teachers’ conceptions of integrated writing skills and interviewed twenty-five Chinese language teachers. Three conceptions emerged from the data, representing writing as a composite of disconnected parts (Category1), a logical inquiry (Category 2), and a developmental process (Category 3). As the categories move up, the alignment between teachers’ conceptions and the curriculum objectives increases accordingly, with the purpose of writing instruction ranging from fulfilling examination requirements, enhancing reasoning skills, to developing integrated use of language skills. The findings also reveal that although the development of integrated writing skills has been a critical component of the Chinese language curriculum since the first public examination in 2007, teachers’ receptivity toward it still varied greatly. Insufficient professional training, the legitimacy of integrated writing as a curriculum component, and the fossilization of the public examination were the factors that accounted for the differing attitudes among the teachers. The discourse of integrated writing in the Hong Kong context has been centered around high-stakes testing. The unbalanced discourse resulted in an oversimplified view that conflated the teaching and learning of integrated writing with integrated writing assessment. The study contributes to the conversation between integrated writing curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Implications for teacher professional development are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballock, E., McQuitty, V., & McNary, S. (2018). An exploration of professional knowledge needed for reading and responding to student writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702576.
Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. R., & Mor-Hagani, S. (2018). Promoting integration of multiple texts: A review of instructional approaches and practices. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 973–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8.
Bomer, R., Land, C. L., Rubin, J. C., & Van Dike, L. M. (2019). Constructs of teaching writing in research about literacy teacher education. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296x19833783.
Briggs, J. O., Russell, J. L., & Wanless, S. B. (2018). Kindergarten teacher buy-in for standards-based reforms: A dynamic interplay between professional identity and perceptions of control. Early Education and Development, 29(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1361288.
Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319737.
Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X., & Liao, X. (2018). Differences between the relationship of L1 learners’ performance in integrated writing with both independent listening and independent reading cognitive skills. Reading and Writing, 31(4), 779–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9811-8.
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145.
Council of Chief State School Officers, & National Governors Association (CCSSO, NGA). (2010). The common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO/NGA.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teacher College Record, 99(3), 453–477.
Cumming, A. (2013). Assessing integrated writing tasks for academic purposes: Promises and perils. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.622016.
Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002.
Cumming, A. Yang, L. Qiu, C. Zhang, L. Ji, X. Wang, J.... Lai, C. (2018). Students’ practices and abilities for writing from sources in English at universities in China. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.001.
Curriculum Development Council. (2017). Chinese language education: Key learning area curriculum guide (Primary 1- Secondary 6). Hong Kong: Education Bureau, HKSAR.
Curriculum Development Council, & Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2007). Chinese language curriculum and assessment guide: Secondary 4–6 (中國語文課程及評估指引: 中四至中六). Hong Kong.
Deng, Z. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge reconceived: Bringing curriculum thinking into the conversation on teachers' content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.021.
Doubet, K. J., & Southall, G. (2018). Integrating reading and writing instruction in middle and high school: The role of professional development in shaping teacher perceptions and practices. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1366607.
Education Convergence. (2008). Report on the survey results of the Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination: Chinese language Paper 1 and paper 5 (in Chinese). Retrieved from https://www.edconvergence.org.hk/main2.htm
Gholami, K., & Husu, J. (2010). How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1520–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.001.
Gibson, W. J., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. London: SAGE Publications.
Grabe, W. (2001). Reading-writing relations: Theoretical perspectives and instructional practices. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 15–47). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Griffin, P., Esther, C., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer.
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319745.
Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2018). 2018 Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination question papers (Chinese language) Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.
Ireland, J., Watters, J., Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teacher’s conceptions of inquiry teaching: Messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9251-2.
Kang, E. Y., McKenna, J. W., Arden, S., & Ciullo, S. (2016). Integrated reading and writing interventions for students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12091.
Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097.
König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauß, S., & Tachtsoglou, S. (2016). Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching English as a foreign language: Assessing the outcomes of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116644956.
Lee, I., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. E. (2019). Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.012.
Leung, C. (2004). Developing formative teacher assessment: Knowledge, practice, and change. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(1), 19–41.
Li, S. C., Poon, A. Y. K., Lai, T. K. H., & Tam, S. T. C. (2018). Does middle leadership matter? Evidence from a study of system-wide reform on English language curriculum. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1529823.
Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical reasoning: The foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching,25: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00132516.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00045-6.
Plakans, L. (2010). Independent vs. Integrated writing tasks: A comparison of task representation. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.215251.
Plakans, L. (2015). Integrated second language writing assessment: Why? What? How? Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12124.
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002.
Plakans, L., Liao, J.-T., & Wang, F. (2019). “I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks. Assessing Writing, 40, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.003.
Polat, B. (2012). Experiencing language: Phenomenography and second language acquisition. Language Awareness, 22(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.658811.
Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2018). Dynamic and shared sense-making in large-scale curriculum reform in school districts. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1447306.
Reutzel, D. R., Dole, J. A., Read, S., Fawson, P., Herman, K., Jones, C. D., ... Forgo, J. (2011). Conceptually and methodologically vexing issues in teacher knowledge assessment. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27(3), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2011.560098.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170644.
Segev-Miller, R. (2007). Cognitive processes in discourse synthesis: The case of intertextual processing strategies. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition : Research and applications (pp. 231–250). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Seto, M. Y. (2010). Preparation and implementation of teaching integrated language skills in the reforming senior secondary chinese curriculum. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Shanahan, T. (2016). Relationships between reading and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 194–207). New York Guilford Press.
Shum, M. S. K. (2011). Assessment and learning of integrated competence (綜合能力的評估與學習). In M. S. K. Shum, D. Y. K. Law, J. W. I. Lam, & A. L. S. Chung (Eds.), New approach for chinese language teaching: Learning and assessment (香港中國語文課程新路向: 學習與評估) (pp. 135–172). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Tan, K. H. K. (2011). Assessment for learning in Singapore: Unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9096-z.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 15(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903057179.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4.
Voon, X. P., Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2019). Principled practical knowledge in bridging practical and reflective experiential learning: Case studies of teachers’ professional development. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09587-z.
Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.563447.
Wang, E. L., & Matsumura, L. C. (2019). Text-based writing in elementary classrooms: Teachers’ conceptions and practice. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 405–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9860-7.
Waugh, R. F., & Punch, K. F. (1987). Teacher receptivity to systemwide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057003237.
Woods, D., & Çakır, H. (2011). Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System, 39(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.010.
Yang, H.-C., & Plakans, L. (2012). Second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated reading-listening-writing task. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.6.
Yigitoglu, N., & Belcher, D. (2014). Exploring L2 writing teacher cognition from an experiential perspective: The role learning to write may play in professional beliefs and practices. System, 47, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.021.
Zhu, X., & Wu, Y. (2013). Secondary school students’ difficulties and learning expectation in integrated chinese language tasks in Hong Kong (in Chinese). Education Journal, 41(1–2), 27–45.
Zhu, X., Li, X., Yu, G., Cheong, C. M., & Liao, X. (2016). Exploring the relationships between independent listening and listening-reading-writing tasks in Chinese language testing: Toward a better understanding of the construct underlying integrated writing tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1210609.
Acknowledgements
The study reported in this article was built upon a research project funded by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (reference no. 15640416).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G.Y., Zhu, X. & Cheong, C.M. Secondary teachers’ conceptions of integrated writing skills: Are teachers’ conceptions aligned with the curriculum objectives. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 21, 379–391 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09629-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09629-x