Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Possibilities for critical pedagogy engagement in higher education: exploring students’ openness and acceptance

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critical pedagogy is an approach to teaching and learning which aims to impact social change through education. In this study, the possibility of engaging with critical pedagogy is explored, by focusing on students’ perceptions of this practice. Data were collected through interviews with 14 Malaysian students. They shared their experiences of learning subjects which touched on social justice issues and critical thinking; which incidentally are also important preoccupations for critical pedagogy. There was consensus about in-depth engagement with social justice issues, including those that were deemed controversial and radical. Besides that, participatory forms of learning such as the co-construction of knowledge were embraced, and students recognised that teachers were not the only source of ‘authorised’ knowledge. Finally, there was a marginal voice of resistance towards the idea of learning about controversial issues because it could risk safety and incite personal attacks from peers. Unequal teacher–student power relations was also seen as a hindrance to critically interrogating socio-political issues, so students were cautious when providing dissenting views. While legitimate concerns are present, overall there seems to be a general openness to critical pedagogy. Therefore, teachers may need to carefully consider the socio-political conditions they are in, because this pedagogy could potentially disrupt order and harmony in the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2012). Introduction. In R. Barnett (Ed.), The future university: Ideas and possibilities. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berchini, C. (2014). Learning to teach and critical pedagogy: Struggling with a “do as I say, not as I do” pedagogy. English Education,46(3), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1145/237477.237546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2003). Putting the critical back into critical pedagogy: A commentary on the path of dissent. Journal of Transformative Education,1(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603001002007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C., & Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In T. Popkewitz & L. Fendler (Eds.), Critical theories in education (pp. 45–65). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction,22(4), 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookes, G. (2013). Critical ELT in action: Foundations, promises, praxis. Retrieved from http://otago.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1157739

  • Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (2003). Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 1–23). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. W. (2008). The (unfulfilled) promise of critical pedagogy. Journal of Social Studies Research,32(2), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. J., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2004). Betraying the intellectual tradition: Public intellectuals and the crisis of youth. In A. M. Phipps & M. Guilherme (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Political approaches to language and intercultural communication (Vol. 8). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2010). Lessons from Paulo Freire. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2011). Paulo Freire and the courage to be political. Our Schools/Our Selves,20, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2016). Beyond pedagogies of repression. Monthly Review,67(10), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-067-10-2016-03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T. (2012). University teaching: An introductory guide. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-King, D., & Smith, M. (2006). Meanings of education for university students: Academic motivation and personal values as predictors. Social Psychology of Education,9(2), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-006-0006-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S., & Lee, V. M. (2012). Toward integration of reading and service learning through an interdisciplinary program. Asia Pacific Education Review,13, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9188-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, S., & Milojevic, I. (2016). Leadership and governance in higher education 2025: Can Malaysian universities meet the challenge? Foresight,18(4), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-03-2016-0011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. (1999). Putting critical pedagogy in its place: A personal account. TESOL Quarterly,33(3), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jon, J. E. (2012). Power dynamics with international students: From the perspective of domestic students in Korean higher education. Higher Education,64(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9503-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Jeyaraj, J., & Harland, T. (2014). Transforming teaching and learning in ELT through critical pedagogy: An international study. Journal of Transformative Education,12(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614550042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Jeyaraj, J., & Harland, T. (2016). Teaching with critical pedagogy in ELT: The problems of indoctrination and risk. Pedagogy, Culture & Society,24, 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1196722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Jeyaraj, J., & Harland, T. (2019). Linking critical pedagogy practice to higher education in Malaysia: Insights from English language teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. C. (2002). Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional values, international outlook. Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005),16(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.8540292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, Y. H. (2013). The NGO-Government relations in Malaysia: Historical context and contemporary discourse. Malaysian Journal of Democracy and Election Studies,1(1), 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura-Walsh, E. (2010). Globalization and social justice in higher education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 536–541). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2007). Critical pedagogy in the twenty-first century. In P. McLaren & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 9–42). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, M., & Wang, T. (2009). Introducing critical literacy to EFL teaching: Three Taiwanese college teachers’ conceptualization. Asian EFL Journal,11(1), 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Y. L., Wong, F. F., & Ismail, K. (2012). Students’ critical consciousness through critical literacy awareness. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies,12(2), 727–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., Cox, L., Boreham, P., Mellick, G., & Lant, P. (2011). Evaluating industry-based doctoral research programs: Perspectives and outcomes of Australian Cooperative Research Centre graduates. Studies in Higher Education,37(7), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.554607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. (2010). Achieving social justice within and through higher education: The challenge for critical pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education,15(5), 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2001). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the politics of hope: Reclaiming critical pedagogy. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies,1(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860100100112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejía, A. (2004). The problem of knowledge imposition: Paulo Freire and critical systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,21(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia education blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Sani, M. A. (2008). Freedom of speech and democracy in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Political Science,16(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P., & Lopez, G. E. (2003). Transformative pedagogy for democracy and social justice. Race, Ethnicity and Education,6(2), 165–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, R. R., & de Urzêda Freitas, M. T. (2012). Challenges in critical language teaching. TESOL Quarterly,46(4), 753–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puteh-Behak, F., Darmi, R., & Mohamed, Y. (2015). Implementation of a western-based multiliteracies pedagogy in Malaysia: A socio-cultural perspective. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies,15(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakir, R. (2009). Soft skills at the Malaysian institutes of higher learning. Asia Pacific Education Review,10, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9038-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information,22(2), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education Basingstoke. Hampshire: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1993). Education is politics: Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. I. (1987). Empowerment as a pedagogy of possibility. Language Arts,64(4), 370–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaaij, R., Oxford, S., & Jeanes, R. (2016). Transforming communities through sport? Critical pedagogy and sport for development. Sport, Education and Society,21(4), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2015.1082127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spronken-Smith, R., Buissink-Smith, N., Grigg, G., & Bond, C. (2009). Millennium graduates’ orientations to higher education. College Student Journal,43(2), 352–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation,27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wink, J. (2000). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, F. L. (2010). A study on the cultural values, perceptual learning styles, and attitudes toward oracy skills of Malaysian tertiary students. European Journal of Social Sciences,13(3), 478–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zion, S., Allen, C. D., & Jean, C. (2015). Enacting a critical pedagogy, influencing teachers’ sociopolitical development. Urban Review,47(5), 914–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0340-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Joanna Joseph Jeyaraj

Authors
  1. Joanna Joseph Jeyaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Joseph Jeyaraj.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joseph Jeyaraj, J. Possibilities for critical pedagogy engagement in higher education: exploring students’ openness and acceptance. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 21, 27–38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09605-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09605-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation