Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness and efficiency of China’s special admission policies: the case of X University

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Chinese government has implemented a series of special admission policies in recent years to increase access to elite universities for disadvantaged students from rural areas and less developed inland regions. Using administrative data of 1996–2015 freshman cohorts and survey data of a 2014 freshman cohort at X University in the eastern China, we empirically assess the effectiveness, and the dual concerns of equity and efficiency of these policies. Findings show that these policies have effectively changed the geographic composition of enrollees at X University toward higher proportions of students from the central and western regions and lower share of the local students. While students from the western region underperformed academically, urban students in this region caught up quickly. Low family SES and weak academic preparation largely explained why rural students from the western region underperformed. Importantly, compared with the local students who scored lower in college entrance exam—the proxy for likely displaced students because of the policies, the likely admission policy beneficiaries performed about equally well. These results indicate that the current practice of Chinese special admission policies has effectively promoted equal access to Chinese elite universities with a limited loss in efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Source: X University administrative data, freshman cohorts 1996–2015)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Among 2014 freshman cohort, the rate of leaving X University is roughly the same at 4% for students from east, central and western regions, but a bit higher at 6% for local students.

  2. Using 3rd performance variables may not be consequential because Chinese college students usually complete majority of their course work by the end of junior year, and mainly focus on graduation preparation, such as internship or a capstone project in the 4th year. Another research study published by the authors finds that the disadvantaged students mostly have completed the academic catching up by the end of junior year.

  3. Comparing the freshman GPA and failing classes based on administrative data that include all enrollees, the survey sample is slightly selective for those from the central region.

  4. For example, among the bottom third local students, 92% are only child, and 41% have a father holding managerial position, 55% need help is study skills; in contrast, among western rural students, the corresponding percentages are 19, 6, and 83%, respectively.

References

  • Adelman, C. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education, 1972–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2007). Diversity, opportunities, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72, 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1972). College dropouts: A national profile. ACE Research Reports, 7 [M]. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. (2000). Weighing the benefits and costs of racial preference in college admissions. Society, 37(4), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., & McCall, B. P. (2002). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, M. (2003) Senator wants college rule axed; Official: Automatic admission for top 10% in high schools is unfair. San Antonio Express News, p. 1.

  • Helms, R. M. (2008). University admissions worldwide. World Bank Education Working Paper 15.

  • Hill, L. D. (2008). School strategies and the ‘college linking’ process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 28, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., & Neilson, W. S. (2011). High scores but low skills. Economics of Education, 30, 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. C., & Tienda, M. (2008). Winners and losers: Changes in Texas University admissions post-hopwood. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 30(3), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Mooney, M. (2007). The effects of America’s three affirmative action programs on academic performance. Social Problems, 54(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montejano, D. (2001). Access to the University of Texas at Austin and the ten percent plan: A three-year assessment. Austin, TX: University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, M. T. (2015). Improving education and outcomes for underrepresented students. Present Institute, The Council of Independent Colleges, 2015. http://www.cic.edu/News-and-Publications/Independent-Newsletter/PI-2015/ Pages/PI-underrepresented-students.aspx.

  • Niu, S. X., & Tienda, M. (2010). Texas Top 10% Law and minority student academic performance: Lessons from UT-Austin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 44–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, O. F. (1989). Undergraduate completion and persistence at four-year colleges and universities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Independent Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Baker, R., & Klasik, D. (2012). Race, income, and enrollment patterns in highly selective colleges, 1982–2004. Stanford, CA: Center for Education Policy Analysis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, M. R. (2009). From high School to the future: Making hard work pay off. Research report. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.

  • Roderick, M. R., Nagaoka, J., Coca, V., & Moeller, E. (2008). From high school to the future: Potholes on the road to college. Research report. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.

  • Rothstein, J. M. (2004). College performance predictions and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, P. H. (2014). Assessing affirmative action. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 483–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (1996). Reflections on the shape of the river. UCLA Law Review, 46, 1583–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, C. (2014). To maximize graduation rates, colleges should focus on middle-range students. Inside Higher Education.

References in Chinese

  • Chen, B. (2003). On the value pursuit and policy choice of equity in Chinese higher education. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 42(2), 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X. Y., Qiao, T. Y., Yu, X. L., Chen, H., Lu, X. D., & Huang, X. T. (2014). An Efficiency criterion of province-based university enrollment -A big data research of regional student group academic performance differences. Chinese Higher Education Research, 2014(12), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. L. (2010). Expansion of higher education and inequality in opportunity of education: A study on effect of “Kuozhao” policy on equalization of educational attainment. Sociology Study, 2010(3), 82–113 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. H., Cao, Z., Jia, D. M., Zhang, Z. W., & Liu, Y. S. (2016). Institutional evolution and urban-rural differences in China: Analysis based on 30-years panel data. Areal Research and Development, 35(1), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. M. (2014). Ability and background: Analysis of mechanism affecting access to higher education. Social Science in China, 2013(8), 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. X. (1999). Thoughts on equity and efficiency in higher education. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 7(3), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. D., Yu, X. L., Chen, H., & Huang, X. T. (2016). Will the rural-urban gap in K-12 school continue in university: An empirical case study of students academic performance. Journal of Higher Education Management, 10(1), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). Postsecondary institution list.

  • National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (2013). National Data.

  • Niu, X. C. (2017). Early academic performance of rural students under special admission policies-evidence from an Elite University. Fudan Education Forum, 15(4), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, L. L., & Wang, Y. W. (2010). Inter-provincial differences -Analysis of resources disequilibrium of education in China. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 5(26), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • The State Council of China. (2000). Notice on development of the western regions.

  • Tian, Z. P., & Li, J. Y. (2002). On equality of education. Research on Education Tsinghua University, 23(1), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsinghua University. (2014). Inequalities in higher education, China in 2011.

  • Wang, C. H., & Li, N. (2007). Inequality in the process of attaining higher education. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 28(4), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. H., Pan, K. F., & Wu, Q. X. (2017). Study on students’ academic performance of the rural and poor area special enrollment program in high level universities: Evidence from A University. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 5, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. X. (2013). Educational opportunities of Chinese rural and urban residents in 1978-2007: Inequality and evolution. Social Science in China, 3, 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, A. (2015). Inside the college gate: Rural students and their academic and social success. Chinese Education & Society, 48, 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, J., & Yu, X. L. (2015). Analysis of learning experience between poor students and non-poor students in research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. G., & Zhang, X. (2003). Some thoughts on equity and efficiency in higher education. Peking University Education Review, 1(1), 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. P. (2011). Higher education opportunities for students from poor families, Education Commentary (in Chinese).

  • Yu, X. L., & Bai, X. (2016). Undergrduate special admission policies favoring candidates of rural China: Debate, reflection and reform. Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. Q., & Wang, Y. J. (2015). A qualitative study of the adaptation of rural college students to college life. Chinese Education & Society, 48, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a China Ministry of Education Humanity and Social Science Research Planning Project Grant (#16YJA880029). We are grateful to Grace Zheng and Amani Grow for their instructive feedbacks and editorial supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunny Xinchun Niu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, S.X., Wan, G. The effectiveness and efficiency of China’s special admission policies: the case of X University. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 19, 63–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9521-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9521-1

Keywords

Navigation