Abstract
This study attempts to design a survey to assess students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices in their classrooms and the resulting knowledge creation self-efficacy among the students. In addition, it also explores the relationships among the various dimensions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Four hundred and eighty-two primary school students from a Singapore school that focuses on the pervasive use of ICT within its school curriculum responded to the survey. The validation of the survey yielded satisfactory reliability and validity through both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The results also showed that the subscales that survey students’ perceptions of critical thinking, creative thinking, and authentic problem-solving were more dominant predictors of their knowledge creation efficacy as compared to their perceptions about the learning processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bindé, J. (2005). “Towards knowledge societies: UNESCO world report.” UNESCO reference works series. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/resources/publications-and-communication-materials/publications/full-list/towards-knowledge-societies-unesco-world-report/
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21 st century skills. London, NY: Springer.
Castle, A. (2006). Assessment of the critical thinking skills of student radiographers. Radiography, 12(2), 88–95.
Chai, C. S., Deng, F., & Tsai, C. -C. (2012). A comparison of scientific epistemological views between mainland China and Taiwan high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 17–26.
Chen, W., Seow, P., So, H. J., Toh, Y., & Looi, C. K. (2010). Extending students’ learning spaces: Technology-supported seamless learning. In Paper presented at the 9th international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 484–491).
Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). University students’ online academic help seeking: The role of self-regulation and information commitments. Internet and Higher Education, 16, 70–77.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26(1), 18–27.
Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London, UK: Springer.
Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking How Students Learn (pp. 51–75). Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
Derry, J. (2014). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions. London: Routledge.
Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1994). Critical thinking: Why we must transform our teaching. Journal of Developmental Education, 18(1), 34–35.
Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136–148.
Griffin, P., MacGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Heidelberg: Springer.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Hogan, D., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). Knowledge management, sustainable innovation, and pre-service teacher education in Singapore. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 369–384.
Howland, J., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2013). The national educational technology standards (NETS). Available online at http://www.iste.org/standards. Accessed 1 Sep 2013.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Towards a design theory of problem. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
Lee, K. S., Tsai, P. -S., Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Students' perceptions of self-directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 425–437.
Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1–30.
Moust, J. H. C., van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, J. H. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50(4), 665–683.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622–647.
Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD). (2005). The definition and selection of key competences. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2013.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Available online at http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2013.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in the knowledge age (pp. 76–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, B., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). Springer, Netherlands.
Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634.
Soh, T. M. T., Osman, K., & Arsad, N. M. (2012). M-21CSI: A validated 21st century skills instrument for secondary science students. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 38–44.
Stahl, G., Koshmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.
Tsai, C. -C., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., Hong, H. -Y., & Tan, S. C. (2013). Positioning design epistemology and its applications in education technology. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 81–90.
Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
Welch, D., & McDowall, J. J. (2010). A comparison of creative strategies in teaching undergraduate students in the visual arts and design. In Paper presented at the ACUADS 2010 conference.
Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146.
Wong, L. H. (2013). Analysis of students’ after-school mobile-assisted artifact creation processes in a seamless language learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 198–211.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical backgrounds, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by research Grant Number NRF2011-EDU002-EL005 entitled Building Blocks for Developing Twenty-First-Century Competences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: the items of the survey
Appendix: the items of the survey
Self-directed learning (SDL)
SDL1. In this class, I make plans for how I will study
SDL2. In this class, I set goals for my studying
SDL3. In this class, I think about different ways or methods I can use to improve my study
SDL4. In this class, I adjust the ways I study based on my progression
SDL5. In this class, I try to check my progress when I study
Meaningful learning with ICT (MLT)
MLT1. In this class, I use the computer to organize and save the information for my learning
MLT2. In this class, I use the computer to record my ideas for my learning progress
MLT3. In this class, I use the computer to remix/reorganize information from other resources
MLT4. In this class, I construct ICT-based materials (e.g., PowerPoint slides, word documents, mindmaps) to represent my understanding
MLT5. In this class, I find out useful information on the Internet to help my learning
Collaborative learning (CoL)
CoL1. In this class, my classmates and I actively work together to learn new things
CoL2. In this class, my classmates and I actively discuss different views we have about things we are learning
CoL3. In this class, my classmates and I actively work together to complete tasks
CoL4. In this class, my classmates and I actively share and explain our understanding
CoL5. In this class, I get helpful comments about my work from my classmates
Critical thinking (CriT)
CriT1. In this class, I think about other possible ways of understanding what I am learning
CriT2. In this class, I consider different opinions to see which one makes more sense
CriT3. In this class, I provide reasons and evidences for my opinions
Creative thinking (CreT)
CreT1. In this class, I generate many new ideas
CreT2. In this class, I create different solutions for a problem
CreT3. In this class, I suggest new ways of doing things
CreT4. In this class, I produce ideas that are likely to be useful
Authentic problem-solving (APS)
APS1. In this class, I investigate the reasons that give rise to real-world problems
APS2. In this class, I learn about real-life problems that people have
APS3. In this class, I am challenged by many real-world problems (e.g., water shortage, racial harmony, environmental issues)
APS4. In this class, I practice solving real-world problems
APS5. In this class, I apply the knowledge I have to solve real-life problems
Knowledge creation efficacy (KCE)
KCE1. I am able to build explanations/theories about things related to the issues that I am learning
KCE2. I am able to connect different ideas to form new ideas
KCE3. I am able to create useful knowledge on my own
KCE4. I am able to generate new ideas about what I am learning
KCE5. I am able to design things that may be useful
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chai, C.S., Deng, F., Tsai, PS. et al. Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 16, 389–398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9379-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9379-4