Skip to main content
Log in

Robust fault diagnosis scheme in a class of nonlinear system based on UIO and fuzzy residual

  • Regular Papers
  • Control Theory and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a novel robust fault diagnosis scheme is developed for a class of nonlinear systems when both fault and disturbance are considered. The proposed scheme includes both component and sensor fault with nonlinear system that transferred to nonlinear Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) model. It considers a larger category of nonlinear system when fuzzification is used for only nonlinear distribution matrices. In fact the proposed method covers nonlinear systems could not transform to linear T-S model. This paper studies the problem of robust fault diagnosis based on two fuzzy nonlinear observers, the first one is a fuzzy nonlinear unknown input observer (FNUIO) and the other is a fuzzy nonlinear Luenberger observer (FNLO). This approach decouples the faulty subsystem from the rest of the system through a series of transformations. Then, the objective is to design FNUIO to guarantee the asymptotic stability of the error dynamic using the Lyapunov method; meanwhile, FNLO is designed for faulty subsystem to generate fuzzy residual signal based on a quadratic Lyapunov function and some matrices inequality convexification techniques. FNUIO affects only the fault free subsystem and completely removes any unknown inputs such as disturbances when residual signal is generated by FNLO is affected by component or sensor fault. This novelty and using nonlinear system in T-S model make the proposed method extremely effective from last decade literature. Sufficient conditions are established in order to guarantee the convergence of the state estimation error. Thus, a residual generator is determined on the basis of LMI conditions such that the estimation error is completely sensitive to fault vector and insensitive to the unknown inputs. Finally, an numerical example is given to show the highly effectiveness of the proposed fault diagnosis scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Gertler, Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems, CRC press, Marcel Dekker, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Chen and R. J. Patton, Robust Model-based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems, Springer US, vol. 3, 2012.

  3. I. Hwang, S. Kim, Y. Kim, and C. E. Seah, “A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 636–653, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Gao, C. Cecati, and S. X. Ding, “A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques, part i: Fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3757–3767, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Gao, C. Cecati, and S. X. Ding, “A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques, part ii: Fault diagnosis with knowledge-based and hybrid/active approaches,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, pp. 6 pp. 3768-3774, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Boukra, A. Lebaroud, and G. Clerc, “Statistical and neural-network approaches for the classification of induction machine faults using the ambiguity plane representation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4034–4042, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Sahin, M. Tolun, and R. Hassanpour, “Hybrid expert systems: A survey of current approaches and applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 4609–4617, 2012. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Raoufi, H. J. Marquez, and A. S. I. Zinober, “H sliding mode observers for uncertain nonlinear lipschitz systems with fault estimation synthesis,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 1785–1801, 2010. [click]

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Yang, F. Zhu, X. Wang, and X. Bu, “Robust sliding-mode observer-based sensor fault estimation, actuator fault detection and isolation for uncertain nonlinear systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1037–1046, 2015. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Ghaniee and M. A. Shoorehdeli, “Fault detection of nonlinear systems by parity relations,” Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA), pp. 519–523, Dec 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Yin, X. Yang, and H. R. Karimi, “Data-driven adaptive observer for fault diagnosis,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering pp. 21, Aug 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  12. X. Zhang, M. M. Polycarpou, and T. Parisini, “Fault diagnosis of a class of nonlinear uncertain systems with lipschitz nonlinearities using adaptive estimation,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 290–299, 2010. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Nagy-Kiss, G. Schutz, and J. Ragot, “Parameter estimation for uncertain systems based on fault diagnosis using Takagi??Sugeno model,” ISA Transactions, vol. 56, no. 65-74, 2015. [click]

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. J. Yoo, “Fault detection and accommodation of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown multiple time-delayed faults,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 255–261, 2014. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M. L. Corradini, A. Cristofaro, R. Giambò, and S. Pettinari, “A lyapunov-based diagnosis signal for fault detection robust tracking problem of a class of sampled-data systems,” CDC-ECE, pp. 3730–3735, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Wang, J. Feng, and H. Zhang, “Robust fault tolerant control for a class of networked control systems with state delay and stochastic actuator failures,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 798–811, 2014. [click]

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.-L. Wang, T.-B. Wang, and Q.-L. Han, “Fault detection filter design for data reconstruction-based continuoustime networked control systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 328 pp. 577–594, 2016. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Su, P. Shi, L. Wu, and Y. D. Song, “Fault detection filtering for nonlinear switched stochastic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1310–1315, May 2016.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. O. Nelles, Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2001.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Feng, Analysis and Synthesis of Fuzzy Control Systems: A Model-based Approach, CRC Press, 2010.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Farivar and M. A. Shoorehdeli, “Fault tolerant synchronization of chaotic heavy symmetric gyroscope systems versus external disturbances via Lyapunov rule-based fuzzy control,” ISA transactions, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 50–64, 2012. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Guo, J. Qiu, H. Tian, and H. Gao, “Fault detection of discrete-time T–S fuzzy affine systems based on piecewise lyapunov functions,” Journal of the Franklin Institute vol. 351, no. 7, pp. 3633–3650, 2014. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ichalal, B. Marx, J. Ragot, and D. Maquin, “Fault detection, isolation and estimation for TakagiSugeno nonlinear systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute vol. 351, no. 7, pp. 3651–3676, 2014. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Q. Shen, B. Jiang, and P. Shi, “Adaptive fault diagnosis for t-s fuzzy systems with sensor faults and system performance analysis,” Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 274–285, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Akhenak, M. Chadli, J. Ragot, and D. Maquin, “Fault detection and isolation using sliding mode observer for uncertain takagi-sugeno fuzzy model,” Control and Automation, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on, IEEE, pp. 286–291, 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Zhang, B. Jiang, and V. Cocquempot, “Fuzzy unknown input observer-based robust fault estimation design for discrete-time fuzzy systems,” Signal Processing, vol. 128, pp. 40–47, 2016. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. X.-J. Li and G.-H. Yang, “Fault detection in finite frequency domain for takagi-sugeno fuzzy systems with sensor faults,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1446–1458, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. X.-J. Li and G.-H. Yang, “Fault detection for t-s fuzzy systems with unknown membership functions,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 139–152, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Dong, Y. Wang, and G. H. Yang, “Control synthesis of continuous-time t-s fuzzy systems with local nonlinear models,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1245–1258, Oct 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Jiuxiang and Y. Guang-Hong, “H dynamic output feedback control for t-s fuzzy systems with local nonlinear models,” Control Conference (CCC), 2012 31st Chinese, pp. 3443–3448, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. A. J. Koopaee and V. J. Majd, “Controller design with constraint on control input and output for T-S fuzzy systems with nonlinear local model,” Proc. of 23rd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering, pp. 876–881, May 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Aldeen and R. Sharma, “Estimation of states, faults and unknown disturbances in non-linear systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1195–1201, 2008. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. X.-G. Yan and C. Edwards, “Nonlinear robust fault reconstruction and estimation using a sliding mode observer,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1605–1614, 2007. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Raoufi and H. Marquezz, “Simultaneous sensor and actuator fault reconstruction and diagnosis using generalized sliding mode observers,” Proc. of American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, pp. 7016–7021, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Zarei and E. Shokri, “Robust sensor fault detection based on nonlinear unknown input observer,” Measurement, vol. 48 pp. 355–367, 2014. [click]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Witczak, “Unknown input observers and filters, in: Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control Strategies for Non-Linear Systems,” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer International Publishing, vol. 266, pp. 19–56, 2014. [click]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. T. Sedighi, A. Koshkouei, and K. J. Burnham, “Nonlinear unknown input observer design for nonlinear systems: A new method,” Preceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11067–11072, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. W. Chen and M. Saif, “Unknown input observer design for a class of nonlinear systems: an lmi approach,” Proc. of American Control Conference, IEEE, pp. 5-, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  39. W. Chen and M. Saif, “Fuzzy nonlinear unknown input observer design with fault diagnosis applications,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 377–401, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. D. Saoudi, M. Chadli, N. B. Braeik, “Robust estimation design for unknown inputs fuzzy bilinear models,” Application to Faults Diagnosis, in: Complex System Modelling and Control Through Intelligent Soft Computations, Springer, pp. 655–685, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. Rajamani, “Observers for lipschitz nonlinear systems,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 397–401, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 1, 1995.

  43. K. K. Hassan, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall Inc., 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. P. B. Jackson, Overview of Missile Flight Control Systems, Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  45. S.-F. C. Albert and N. E. Leonard, “Fin failure compensation for an unmanned underwater vehicle,” Proc. 11th Int. Symp. on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, Citeseer, pp. 10, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  46. A. Alessandri, “Observer design for nonlinear systems by using input-to-state stability,” Proc. of 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), vol. 4, pp. 3892–3897, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hamideh Sedigh Ziyabari.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Guang-Hong Yang under the direction of Editor Euntai Kim.

S. Hamideh Sedigh Ziyabari received the B.S. degree in Electronic Engineering from Guilan University in 2008 and M.Sc degree in Control Engineering from the Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran in 2010. In Sep.2012, She joined as a PhD student to Control and System of Science and Research branch of Azad University of Tehran. Her research interests include Fault detection and estimation, Nonlinear control, Predictive control and their application to control of the world.

Mahdi Aliyari Shoorehdeli received his B.S. degree in Electronic Engineering in 2001, his M.Sc and Ph.D. degrees in Control Engineering in 2003 and 2008 in Control Engineering from K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran repetitively. He has been with the Mechatronics Department of K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran since 2010. His research interests include Fault Diagnosis, System Identification and Alarm Management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ziyabari, S.H.S., Shoorehdeli, M.A. Robust fault diagnosis scheme in a class of nonlinear system based on UIO and fuzzy residual. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 15, 1145–1154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-016-0145-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-016-0145-0

Keywords

Navigation