Skip to main content
Log in

Application of ChatGPT as a support tool in the diagnosis and management of acute bacterial tonsillitis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming medicine through techniques like machine learning and deep learning. AI aids diagnosis, enhances patient care, and streamlines healthcare systems. Despite potential benefits, challenges of bias and trust must be managed. Tonsillitis is a common otolaryngological condition with economic implications. The study assesses ChatGPT’s utility in the diagnosis management of bacterial tonsillitis, highlighting its potential for patient-professional interaction.

Methods

2 methods evaluated ChatGPT 3.5 diagnostic ability for tonsillitis: patient-written cases and specialist-created cases. The scenarios involved real patients and fictional cases, assessed by 15 otolaryngologists and 5 pediatricians. Variables included diagnosis accuracy, recommendations quality, and message count.

Results

A total of 35 conversations were conducted. ChatGPT achieved accurate diagnoses in 100% of cases, with an average of 3.7 ± 1.1 chat entries for diagnosis. No significant difference existed between professional and patient scenarios (p = 0.977). Recommendations were categorized: appropriate (48.57%), incomplete (45.71%), inappropriate (5.71%), with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.196). ChatGPT consistently advised consulting a doctor and exhibited expertise in guiding medical consultations.

Conclusion

ChatGPT demonstrates promise in providing medical insights and general advice. Its diagnostic accuracy for tonsillitis is notable, but it relies on static data and lacks individual history assessment. ChatGPT shows potential for diagnostics in simpler cases like tonsillitis, but accuracy for complex conditions needs refinement. Further research is needed for validation and broader application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No new data were created.

References

  1. Busby D, Grauer R, Pandav K, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer histopathology. Urol Oncol S. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.002. 1078-1439(22)00487–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krentzel D, Shorte SL, Zimmer C. Deep learning in image-based phenotypic drug discovery. Trends Cell Biol S. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2022.11.011. 0962-8924(22)00262–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiesa-Estomba CM, Sistiaga-Suarez JA, González-García JÁ, et al. Artificial Neural Network as a Tool to predict facial nerve palsy in parotid gland surgery for Benign tumors. Med Sci Basel Switz. 2020;8:42. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci8040042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J, Wu J, Qiu Y, et al. Intelligent speech technologies for transcription, disease diagnosis, and medical equipment interactive control in smart hospitals: a review. Comput Biol Med. 2023;153:106517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lechien JR, Briganti G, Vaira LA. Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and – 4 in providing scientific references in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;281:2159–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08441-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McMahon GT. The risks and challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;dgae017https://doi.org/2024031218494853500.

  7. Lechien JR. Generative artificial intelligence in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery editorial: be an actor of the future or follower. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;281:2051–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08579-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tayebi Arasteh S, Ziller A, Kuhl C, et al. Preserving fairness and diagnostic accuracy in private large-scale AI models for medical imaging. Commun Med. 2024;4:46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00462-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hakanen O, Tolvi M, Torkki P. Cost analysis of face-to-face visits, virtual visits, and a digital care pathway in the treatment of tonsillitis patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023;44:103868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Windfuhr JP, Toepfner N, Steffen G, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis I. Diagnostics and nonsurgical management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:973–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3872-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. (2022) OpenAI, editor. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

  12. Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Vaira LA, et al. Exploring the potential of Chat-GPT as a supportive tool for sialendoscopy clinical decision making and patient information support. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08104-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

  14. jamovi - open. statistical software for the desktop and cloud. https://www.jamovi.org/. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

  15. Radley-Gardner O, Beale H, Zimmermann R. Fundamental texts on European private law. Hart Publishing; 2016.

  16. Parikh RB, Teeple S, Navathe AS. Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care. JAMA. 2019;322:2377–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.18058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hulsen T. Literature analysis of artificial intelligence in biomedicine. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10:1284. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2022-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ronen J, Hayat S, Akalin A. Evaluation of colorectal cancer subtypes and cell lines using deep learning. Life Sci Alliance. 2019;2:e201900517. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201900517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, et al. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23:1241–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Briganti G, Le Moine O. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: today and tomorrow. Front Med. 2020;7:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Orth M, Averina M, Chatzipanagiotou S, et al. Opinion: redefining the role of the physician in laboratory medicine in the context of emerging technologies, personalised medicine and patient autonomy (‘4P medicine’). J Clin Pathol. 2019;72:191–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has not received any form of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, MMY & LGT; methodology, MMY & LGT; formal analysis, MMY & LGT; investigation, MMY & LGT; writing?original draft preparation, MMY & LGT; writing?review and editing, JRL, CMCE, FA, AMS, LAV, AM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Mayo-Yáñez.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics

All patients received and signed an informed consent to participate in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayo-Yáñez, M., González-Torres, L., Saibene, A. et al. Application of ChatGPT as a support tool in the diagnosis and management of acute bacterial tonsillitis. Health Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-024-00858-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-024-00858-3

Keywords

Navigation