Skip to main content
Log in

An enhanced force bounding approach for stable haptic interaction by including friction

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an inherent trade-off between stability and transparency in haptic interaction systems when interacting with virtual environments. Therefore, no perfect transparency can be displayed with absolute stability. For meaningful interactions, anyhow, some level of transparency is necessary for providing realistic feelings. On the other hand, robust stability must absolutely be guaranteed against any virtual environments because unstable behaviors disrupt contact realism completely and/or may also injure human operators. In order to increase magnitude transparency of the haptic interaction system, this paper proposes a way of systematic inclusion of Coulomb friction component in the previous force bounding approach. In the inclusion, two type of force bounding approach are derived. The less conservative condition can generate significantly higher magnitude transparency in terms of the initial contact crispness as well as the steady-state contact force for very stiff virtual objects. However, there occur some contact oscillations to diminish contact realism due to the energy accumulation during free motion. In order to avoid contact oscillations, a more conservative condition is proposed for systematically removing the past accumulated energy. The proposed algorithm is also compared with the other similar algorithm. Comprehensive experimental results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim, Y.-A., Lee, C.-G., Kim, J.-P., and Ryu, J., “Development of an AFM-Based Nanomanipulation System and Stable Haptic Interaction Using Modified Energy-Bounding Algorithm,” Proc. of ICCASSICE, pp. 3798–3802, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolopion, A., Dahmen, C., Stolle, C., Haliyo, S., Régnier, S., and Fatikow, S., “Vision-Based Haptic Feedback for Remote Micromanipulation In-SEM Environment,” International Journal of Optomechatronics, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 236–252, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolopion, A., Xie, H., Haliyo, D.S., and Régnier, S., “Haptic Teleoperation for 3-D Microassembly of Spherical Objects,” IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 116–127, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ullah, F. and Park, K., “Development of A Surface-Based Virtual Dental Sculpting Simulator with Multimodal Feedback,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 577–587, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colgate, J. E. and Schenkel, G., “Passivity of a Class of Sampled-Data Systems: Application to Haptic Interfaces,” Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 3236–3240, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colgate, J. E., Stanley, M. C., and Brown, J. M., “Issues in the Haptic Display of Tool Use,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 95.'Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots', pp. 140–145, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hannaford, B. and Ryu, J.-H., “Time-Domain Passivity Control of Haptic Interfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1–10, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, J.-P. and Ryu, J., “Robustly Stable Haptic Interaction Control Using an Energy-Bounding Algorithm,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 666–679, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, D. and Huang, K., “Passive-Set-Position-Modulation Framework for Interactive Robotic Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 354–369, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryu, J.-H. and Yoon, M.-Y., “Memory-Based Passivation Approach for Stable Haptic Interaction,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1424–1435, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diolaiti, N., Niemeyer, G., Barbagli, F., and Salisbury, J. K., “Stability of Haptic Rendering: Discretization, Quantization, Time Delay, and Coulomb Effects,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 256–268, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbott, J. J. and Okamura, A. M., “Effects of Position Quantization and Sampling Rate on Virtual-Wall Passivity,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 952–964, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Colonnese, N. and Okamura, A., “Stability and Quantization-Error Analysis of Haptic Rendering of Virtual Stiffness and Damping,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1103–1120, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J., Seo, C., Ryu, J., and Kim, J.-P., “Enhancing Rate-Hardness of Energy-Bounding Algorithm by Considering Coulomb Friction of Haptic Interface,” Proc. of Haptics Symposium, pp. 157–160, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, K. and Lee, D. Y., “Adjusting Output-Limiter for Stable Haptic Rendering In Virtual Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 768–779, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, J.-P., Baek, S.-Y., and Ryu, J., “A Force Bounding Approach for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Haptic Interaction,” IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 1193–1203, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geomagic, “Haptic Devices that Add the Sense of Touch to your Digital World,” http://www.geomagic.com/en/products-landingpages/ haptic (Accessed 24 MAY 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence, D. A., Pao, L. Y., Dougherty, A. M., Salada, M. A., and Pavlou, Y., “Rate-Hardness: A New Performance Metric for Haptic Interfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 357–371, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh, M. H., Wang, D., and Kubica, E., “Perception-Based Lossy Haptic Compression Considerations for Velocity-Based Interactions,” Multimedia Systems, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 275–282, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehling, J. S., Colgate, J. E., and Peshkin, M. A., “Increasing the Impedance Range of a Haptic Display by Adding Electrical Damping,” Proc. of 1st Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 257–262, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim, Y.-A., Ahn, H.-S., and Ryu, J., “Analogue Input Shaper for Haptic Interfaces,” IET Control Theory & Applications, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 1553–1564, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeha Ryu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baek, SY., Park, S. & Ryu, J. An enhanced force bounding approach for stable haptic interaction by including friction. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 18, 813–824 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0097-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0097-1

Keywords

Navigation