Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A methodology for optimizing modular design considering product end of life strategies

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Product modularity is a concept of clustering the independent components into logical units that are relatively independent to each other in functions. With the growing interest in environmental protection, the inclusion of product end of life issues during product design has been seen as a promising method to improve product utilization after its retirement. There are very few methodologies that deal with modularity at the conceptual design stage in which incorporate product end of life strategies and end of life cost in the literature. The lack of information during conceptual design will cause failure in overcoming drawbacks that will be apparent later in the detail design. The motivation of this study is to identify the relationship between product end of life strategies and modular design, and to formulate an optimization method to assist designers in designing products with appropriate end of life strategies to reduce environmental impact during product retirement. This paper proposes a practical method in optimizing modular design with different end of life strategies by using an Excel based approach that will be usable by designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

assembly

M :

module

s :

number of modules

n :

number of alternative modules

c :

number components

i :

index for modules

j :

index of components

k :

index of alternative modules

I ijk :

integrated relationship matrix

C func :

matrix of function modular clustering driver

X i :

depreciation factor of a specific component i

H i :

disassembly cost

L cost :

labour cost

T :

time for disassembly

R c :

recycling cost

C removal :

cost for special treatment/remove hazardous or toxic waste

P comp :

price of component after retirement

n comp :

number of component

P rec :

price of reclaimed material

m mat :

quantity of material

P rec-sp :

price of reclaimed material after special treatment

m mat-sp :

quantity of reclaimed material after special treatment

L cost-sp :

labour cost for special treatment

T sp :

time needed for special treatment

References

  1. Zhang, W. Y. Tor, S. Y., and Britton, G. A., “Managing Modularity in Product Family Design with Functional Modeling,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 30, No. 7-8, pp. 579–588, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, S. and Okudan, G. E., “Computer-Aided Generation of Modularised Conceptual Designs with Assembly and Variety Considerations,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 553–551, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nepal, B., Monplaisir, L., and Singh, N., “Integrated Fuzzy Logicbased Model for Product Modularization during Concept Development Phase,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 157–174, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kusiak, A., “Integrated Product and Process Design: A Modularity Perspective,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 223–231, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu, P. and Sosale, S., “Product Modularization for Life Cycle Engineering,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 387–401, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tseng, H.-E., Chang, C.-C., and Li, J.-D., “Modular Design to Support Green Life-Cycle Engineering,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 2524–2537, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Umeda, Y., Fukushige, S., Tonoike, K., and Kondoh, S., “Product Modularity for Life Cycle Design,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 13–16, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, S., Yang, Q., Tao, J., Tian, X., and Yin, F., “Product Modular Design Incorporating Life Cycle Issues-Group Genetic Algorithm (GGA) based Method,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 1016–1032, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishii, K., “Product Modularity: A Key Concept in Life-Cycle Design,” National Academy Press, pp. 17–24, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson, D. and Ulrich, K., “Platform Product Development,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 19–31, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B., “Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems,” Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lai, X. and Gershenson, J. K., “Representation of Similarity and Dependency for Assembly Modularity,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 37, No. 7-8, pp. 803–827, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Newcomb, P. J., Bras, B., and Rosen, D. W., “Implications of Modularity on Product Design for the Life Cycle,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 483–490, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, D., Hu, Y., and Li, C., “Mechanical Product Disassembly Sequence and Path Planning based on Knowledge and Geometric Reasoning,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 688–696, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Urich, K. and Tung, K., “Fundamental of Product Modularity,” Proc. of the ASME Design Technical Conference on Design Manufacture/Integration, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coulter, S. L., McIntosh, M. W., Bras, B., and Rosen, D. W., “Identification of Limiting Factors for Improving Design Modularity,” Proc. of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., and Zhang, Y., “Product Modularity: Definitions and Benefits,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 295–313, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gertsakis, J. and Lewis, H., “Sustainability and the Waste Management Hierarchy,” http://www.helenlewisresearch.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/TZW_-_Sustainability_and_the_Waste_ Hierarchy_2003.pdf (Accessed 26 AUG 2015)

  19. O'Brien, C., “Sustainable Production-A New Paradigm for a New Millennium,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vols. 60-61, pp. 1–7, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kimura, F., Kato, S., Hata, T., and Masuda, T., “Product Modularization for Parts Reuse in Inverse Manufacturing,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 89–92, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qian, X. and Zhang, H. C., “Design for Environment: An Environmental Analysis Model for the Modular Design of Products,” Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 114–119, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Su, J. C., Chu, C.-H., and Wang, Y.-T., “A Decision Support System to Estimate the Carbon Emission and Cost of Product Designs,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1037–1045, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luh, Y.-P., Chu, C.-H., and Pan, C.-C., “Data Management of Green Product Development with Generic Modularized Product Architecture,” Contents in Industry, Vol. 61, pp. 223–234, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sosale, S., Hashemian, M., and Gu, P., “Product Modularization for Reuse and Recycling,” ASME, Design Engineering Division, Vol. 94, pp. 195–206, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krikke, H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., and Van Wassenhove, L., “Concurrent Product and Closed-Loop Supply Chain Design with an Application to Refrigerators,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 16, pp. 3689–3719, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, J., Zhang, H.-C., Gonzalez, M. A., and Yu, S., “A Multi- Objective Fuzzy Graph Approach for Modular Formulation Considering End-of-Life Issues,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46, No. 14, pp. 4011–4033, 2008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwak, M. J., Hong, Y. S., and Cho, N. W., “Eco-Architecture Analysis for End-of-Life Decision Making,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47, No. 22, pp. 6233–6259, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Novita Sakundarini, Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid

  2. Intelligent Mechatronics, Manufacturing and Sports Laboratory, Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

    Zahari Taha

Authors
  1. Novita Sakundarini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zahari Taha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Novita Sakundarini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakundarini, N., Taha, Z., Ghazilla, R.A.R. et al. A methodology for optimizing modular design considering product end of life strategies. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16, 2359–2367 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0304-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0304-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation