Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appearance, Friends, and Feelings: A Two-Study Exploration of Young Women’s Emotional Associations and Indoor Tanning Frequency

  • Full length manuscript
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of its potential cancer risk is often not enough to motivate individuals to avoid indoor tanning. Previous research has found that emotions toward indoor tanning and appearance motivations may prompt people to continue despite the risks.

Methods

We conducted two online surveys of US young adult women. Study one included a convenience sample of female undergraduates (N = 502) at a university in the northwestern USA. Study two included young women from a nationwide US online panel (N = 270).

Results

Results suggest that emotional associations, both positive and negative, with indoor tanning explain greater variances in indoor tanning behavior than demographics and previously established psychosocial predictors of tanning alone. Appearance motivations were also positively associated with indoor tanning in both samples.

Conclusions

This research has implications for health care providers and health communicators, as indoor tanning prevention messages and campaigns should consider the association between both positive and negative emotions on tanning behaviors as well as appearance motivations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colantonio S, Bracken MB, Beecker J. The association of indoor tanning and melanoma in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.11.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guy GP Jr, Watson M, Seidenberg AB, Hartman AM, Holman DM, Perna F. Trends in indoor tanning and its association with sunburn among US adults. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6):1191–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowers JM, Geller AC, Schofield E, Li Y, Hay JL. Indoor tanning trends among US adults, 2007–2018. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(6):823–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghiasvand R, Rueegg CS, Weiderpass E, Green AC, Lund E, Veierød MB. Indoor tanning and melanoma risk: long-term evidence from a prospective population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(3):147–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wehner MR, Shive ML, Chren MM, Han J, Qureshi AA, Linos E. Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ : Br Med J. 2012;345:e5909. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman SR, Liguori A, Kucenic M, et al. Ultraviolet exposure is a reinforcing stimulus in frequent indoor tanners. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nolan BV, Taylor SL, Liguori A, Feldman SR. Tanning as an addictive behavior: a literature review. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2009;25(1):12–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00392.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carcioppolo N, Chen Y, John KK, et al. The development and validation of the mood-based indoor tanning scale. Am J Health Behav. 2017;41(1):42–51. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.41.1.4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noar SM, Myrick JG, Morales-Pico B, Thomas NE. Development and validation of the comprehensive indoor tanning expectations scale. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):512–21. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.9086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Myrick JG, Noar SM, Kelley D, Zeitany AE, Morales-Pico BM, Thomas NE. A longitudinal test of the Comprehensive Indoor Tanning Expectations Scale: the importance of affective beliefs in predicting indoor tanning behavior. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315595116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gambla WC, Fernandez AM, Gassman NR, Tan MCB, Daniel CL. College tanning behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, and intentions: a systematic review of the literature. Prev Med. 2017;105:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodríguez VM, Daniel CL, Welles BF, Geller AC, Hay JL. Friendly tanning: young adults’ engagement with friends around indoor tanning. J Behavioral Med. 2017:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9832-4

  13. Holman DM, Jones SE, Qin J, Richardson LC. Prevalence of indoor tanning among U.S. high school students from 2009 to 2017. J Community Health. 2019;44(6):1086–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00685-y

  14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent skin cancer. Washington, D.C.2014.

  15. Noar SM. A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here. J Health Commun. 2006;11:21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carcioppolo N, Orrego Dunleavy V, Myrick JG. A closer look at descriptive norms and indoor tanning: investigating the intermediary role of positive and negative outcome expectations. Health Commun. 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1517632

  17. Goulart JM, Wang SQ. Knowledge, motivation, and behavior patterns of the general public towards sun protection. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010;9(4):432–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/b9pp00122k

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kourosh AS, Harrington CR, Adinoff B. Tanning as behavioral addiction. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010;36:284–90. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2010.491883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith CA, Ellsworth PC. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48(4):813–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roseman IJ. Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emot Rev. 2011;3(4):434–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glanz K, Jordan A, Lazovich D, Bleakley A. Frequent indoor tanners’ beliefs about indoor tanning and cessation. Am J Health Promot. 2019;33(2):293–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118784235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Danoff-Burg S, Mosher CE. Predictors of tanning salon use: behavioral alternatives for enhancing appearance, relaxing and socializing. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(3):511–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105306063325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. So J. A further extension of the Extended Parallel Process Model (E-EPPM): implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health Commun. 2013;28(1):72–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.708633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lerner JS, Keltner D. Fear, anger, and risk. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(1):146–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoo JJ, Hur WM. Body-tanning attitudes among female college students. Psychol Rep. 2014;114(2):585–96. https://doi.org/10.2466/06.07.PR0.114k21w5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cafri G, Thompson J, Jacobsen PB. Appearance reasons for tanning mediate the relationship between media influence and uv exposure and sun protection. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(8):1065–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.142.8.1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cafri G, Thompson JK, Roehrig M, et al. Appearance motives to tan and not tan: evidence for validity and reliability of a new scale. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):209–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9022-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cafri G, Thompson JK, Jacobsen PB, Hillhouse J. Investigating the role of appearance-based factors in predicting sunbathing and tanning salon use. J Behav Med. 2009;32(6):532–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9224-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noar SM, Myrick JG, Zeitany A, Kelley D, Morales-Pico B, Thomas NE. Testing a social cognitive theory-based model of indoor tanning: implications for skin cancer prevention messages. Health Commun. 2015;30(2):164–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carcioppolo N, Orrego Dunleavy V, Yang Q. How do perceived descriptive norms influence indoor tanning intentions? An application of the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun. 2017;32(2):230–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1120697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowers JM, Moyer A. ‘I am happier with my fairer complexion’: factors associated with former indoor tanning and reasons for quitting in college women. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24(3):344–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1537497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Holman DM, Watson M. Correlates of intentional tanning among adolescents in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5, Supplement):S52-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.021

  34. Hillhouse JJ, Turrisi R, Kastner M. Modeling tanning salon behavioral tendencies using appearance motivation, self-monitoring and the theory of planned behavior. Health Educ Res. 2000;15(4):405–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/15.4.405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Willoughby JF, Myrick JG. Entertainment, social media use and young women's tanning behaviours. Health Educ J. 2019;78(1): 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896918819643

  36. Gillen MM, Markey CN. The role of body image and depression in tanning behaviors and attitudes. Behav Med. 2012;38(3):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2012.685499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types i through vi. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(6):869–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fredrickson BL. What good are positive emotions? Rev Gen Psychol. 1998;2:300–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahler HIM, Kulik JA, Butler HA, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX. Social norms information enhances the efficacy of an appearance-based sun protection intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(2):321–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hillhouse JJ, Turrisi R, Stapleton J, Robinson J. A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-focused intervention to prevent skin cancer. Cancer. 2008;113(11):3257–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stapleton J, Turrisi R, Hillhouse J, Robinson JK, Abar B. A comparison of the efficacy of an appearance-focused skin cancer intervention within indoor tanner subgroups identified by latent profile analysis. J Behav Med. 2010;33(3):181–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9246-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hillhouse JJ, Turrisi R. Examination of the efficacy of an appearance-focused intervention to reduce UV exposure. J Behav Med. 2002;25(4):395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Finch L, Janda M, Loescher LJ, Hacker E. Can skin cancer prevention be improved through mobile technology interventions? A systematic review. Prev Med. 2016;90:121–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Quick BL, Kam JA, Morgan SE, Montero Liberona CA, Smith RA. Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: an extension of psychological reactance theory. J Commun. 2015;65(1):40–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fabrigar LR, Petty RE. The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;25(3):363–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nabi RL. Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Commun Res. 2003;30(2):224–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Noar SM, Grant Harrington N, Van Stee SK, Shemanski AR. Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011;5(2):112–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827610387255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Myrick JG. The role of emotions and social cognitive variables in online health information seeking processes and effects. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;68:422–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Persson S, Benn Y, Dhingra K, Clark-Carter D, Owen AL, Grogan S. Appearance-based interventions to reduce UV exposure: a systematic review. Br J Health Psychol. 2018;23(2):334–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Edward R. Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA

    Jessica Fitts Willoughby & Jiayu Li

  2. Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA

    Jessica Gall Myrick

Authors
  1. Jessica Fitts Willoughby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Gall Myrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiayu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Fitts Willoughby.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Animal Welfare

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willoughby, J.F., Myrick, J.G. & Li, J. Appearance, Friends, and Feelings: A Two-Study Exploration of Young Women’s Emotional Associations and Indoor Tanning Frequency. Int.J. Behav. Med. 28, 705–714 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-09968-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-09968-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation