Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in Identification of Possible Pain Coping Strategies by People with Osteoarthritis who Complete Web-based Pain Coping Skills Training

  • Full length manuscript
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We previously demonstrated that automated, Web-based pain coping skills training (PCST) can reduce osteoarthritis pain. The present secondary analyses examined whether this program also changed coping strategies participants identified for use in hypothetical pain-related situations.

Method

People with hip/knee osteoarthritis (n = 107) were randomized to Web-based PCST or standard care control. At baseline and post-intervention, they reported their pain severity and impairment, then completed a task in which they described how they would cope with pain in four hypothetical pain-related situations, also reporting their perceived risk for pain and self-efficacy for managing it. We coded the generated coping strategies into counts of adaptive behavioral, maladaptive behavioral, adaptive cognitive, and discrete adaptive coping strategies (coping repertoire).

Results

Compared to the control arm, Web-based PCST decreased the number of maladaptive behavioral strategies generated (p = 0.002) while increasing the number of adaptive behavioral strategies generated (p = 0.006), likelihood of generating at least one adaptive cognitive strategy (p = 0.01), and the size of participants’ coping repertoire (p = 0.009). Several of these changes were associated with changes in pain outcomes (ps = 0.01 to 0.65). Web-based PCST also reduced perceived risk for pain in the situations (p = 0.03) and increased self-efficacy for avoiding pain in similar situations (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Salutary changes found in this study appear to reflect intervention-concordant learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hootman JM, Helmick CG, Barbour KE, Theis KA, Boring MA. Updated projected prevalence of self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation among US adults, 2015–2040. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1582–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Brady TJ. Vital signs: prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation - United States, 2013–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:246–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martel-Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM, et al. Osteoarthritis Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis Lancet. 2019;393:1745–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolasinski KL, Neogi T, Hochberg HC, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72:149–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keefe FJ, Porter L, Somers T, Shelby R, Wren AV. Psychosocial interventions for managing pain in older adults: outcomes and clinical implications. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:89–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keefe FJ, Somers TJ. Psychological approaches to understanding and treating arthritis pain. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:210–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon KE, Keefe FJ, Scipio CD, Perri LM, Abernethy AP. Psychological interventions for arthritis pain management in adults: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2007;26:241–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Broderick JE, Keefe FJ, Bruckenthal P, et al. Nurse practitioners can effectively deliver pain coping skills training to osteoarthritis patients with chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial. Pain. 2014;155:1743–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, et al. Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain. 2001;17:52–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Somers TJ, Wren AA, Shelby RA. The context of pain in arthritis: self-efficacy for managing pain and other symptoms. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:502–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, Giordano LA, Perri LM. Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J Pain. 2004;5:195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Merluzzi TV, Pustejovsky JE, Philip EJ, Sohl SJ, Berendsen M, Salsman JM. Interventions to enhance self-efficacy in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychooncology. 2019;28:1781–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marks R. Self-efficacy and arthritis disability: an updated synthesis of the evidence base and its relevance to optimal patient care. Health Psychol Open. 2014;1:2055102914564582.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson T, Wang Y, Wang Y, Fan H. Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: a meta-analytic review. J Pain. 2014;15:800–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eccleston C, Fisher E, Craig L, Duggan GB, Rosser BA, Keogh E. Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD010152.

  19. Macea DD, Gajos K, Daglia Calil YA, Fregni F. The efficacy of Web-based cognitive behavioral interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2010;11:917–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bender JL, Radhakrishnan A, Diorio C, Englesakis M, Jadad AR. Can pain be managed through the Internet? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2011;152:1740–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. REDACTED FOR BLIND REVIEW.

  22. Baumeister H, Reichler L, Munzinger M, Lin J. The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions: a systematic review. Internet Interventions. 2015;1:205–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rini C, Porter LS, Somers TJ, McKee DC, Keefe FJ. Retaining critical therapeutic elements of behavioral interventions translated for delivery via the Internet: recommendations and an example using pain coping skills training. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014;16:e245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Theim KR, Sinton MM, Stein RI, et al. Preadolescents’ and parents’ dietary coping efficacy during behavioral family-based weight control treatment. J Youth Adolesc. 2012;41:86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Drapkin RG, Wing RR, Shiffman S. Responses to hypothetical high risk situations: do they predict weight loss in a behavioral treatment program or the context of dietary lapses? Health Psychol. 1995;14:427–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaney EF, O’Leary MR, Marlatt GA. Skill training with alcoholics. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978;46:1092–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jordan JM. An ongoing assessment of osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians in North Carolina: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:77–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34:505–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1039–1049.

  30. Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002;40:771–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, et al. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:561–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simkin LR, Gross AM. Assessment of coping with high-risk situations for exercise relapse among healthy women. Health Psychol. 1994;13:274–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grilo CM, Shiffman S, Wing RR. Relapse crises and coping among dieters. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57:488–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32:37–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lorig K, Holman H. Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scales measure self-efficacy. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11:155–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:1–10.

  37. Martinez-Calderon J, Jensen MP, Morales-Asencio JM, Luque-Suarez A. Pain catastrophizing and function in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2019;35:279–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rini C, Williams DA, Broderick JE, Keefe FJ. Meeting them where they are: using the Internet to deliver behavioral medicine interventions for pain. Transl Behav Med. 2012;2:82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), part of the National Institutes of Health (R01AR057346). The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, from which some participants in this trial were recruited, was supported in part by cooperative agreements S043, S1734, and S3486 from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention/Association of Schools of Public Health; the NIAMS Multipurpose Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disease Center grant P60AR30701; and the NIAMS Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center grants P60AR49465 and P60AR064166. The sponsors who provided financial support for the conduct of the research did not influence study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; the writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for publication. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT01638871).

Funding

 National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR057346).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Rini.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rini, C., Katz, A.W.K., Nwadugbo, A. et al. Changes in Identification of Possible Pain Coping Strategies by People with Osteoarthritis who Complete Web-based Pain Coping Skills Training. Int.J. Behav. Med. 28, 488–498 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09938-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09938-w

Keywords

Navigation