Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Video transects are the most appropriate underwater visual census method for surveying high-latitude coral reef fishes in the southwestern Indian Ocean

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biodiversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pilot studies are used to assess different sampling and monitoring protocols when developing long-term monitoring programs (LTMPs). Considering that the ultimate goal of LTMPs is preservation-orientated, non-destructive sampling methods are favoured. For coral reef fishes, underwater visual censuses (UVCs) have become the method of choice for surveying shallow, highly-diverse reefs. This study assessed three different UVC transect types to monitor high-latitude western Indian Ocean coral reefs; these were slate, photo and video transects. Slate data were analysed with CountN (all fish observed), while footage from reviewable photo and video transects was analysed by both CountN and MaxN (a single frame with the most fish per species), resulting in an assessment of five transect-type analysis technique combinations; slate, photo-CountN, video-CountN, photo-MaxN and video-MaxN. Video-CountN transects had the highest estimates of richness and abundance, the lowest variability, and the most representative diversity. Video-CountN transects were also the most efficient in that the time taken to analyse footage was comparable to the other combinations considered, the proportion of unidentifiable individuals was low, and it required the lowest sample size to achieve an acceptable statistical power. Video-CountN transecting is therefore recommended as the most appropriate method for conducting UVCs of high-latitude coral reef fishes in the southwestern Indian Ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman J, Bellwood D (2000) Reef fish assemblages: a re-evaluation using enclosed rotenone stations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alevizon WS, Brooks MG (1975) The comparative structure of two western Atlantic reef-fish assemblages. Bull Mar Sci 25:482–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausell R, Li Y (2002) Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical and social sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker A, Cowley PD, Whitfield AK (2010) Use of remote underwater video to record littoral habitat use by fish within a temporarily closed South African estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 391:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett RH, Götz A, Sauer WHH, Cowley PD, Palmer RM (2009) Optimisation of underwater visual census and controlled angling methods for monitoring subtidal temperate reef fish communities. Afr J Mar Sci 31:277–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard ATF, Götz A, Kerwath SE, Wilke CJ (2013) Observer bias and detection probability in the underwater visual census of fish assemblages measured with independent double-observers. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 443:75–85

  • Bohnsack JA, Bannerot SP (1986) A stationary visual census technique for quantitatively assessing community structure of coral reef fishes. NOAA Tech Rep NMFS 41:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortone SA, Kimmel J (1991) Environmental assessment and monitoring of artificial reefs. In: Seaman W, Sprague LM (eds) Artificial habitats for marine and freshwater fisheries. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 117–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortone SA, Hastings RW, Oglesby JL (1986) Quantification of reef fish assemblages: A comparison of several in situ methods. Northeast Gulf Sci 8:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortone SA, Kimmel JJ, Bundrick CM (1989) A comparison of three methods for visually assessing reef fish communities: time and area compensated. Northeast Gulf Sci 10:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortone SA, Martin T, Bundrick CM (1991) Visual census of reef fish assemblages: A comparison of slate, audio and video recording devices. Northeast Gulf Sci 12:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortone SA, Samoilys MA, Francour P (2000) Fish and macroinvertebrate evaluation. In: Seaman W (ed) Artificial reef evaluation with application to natural marine habitats. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 127–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock V (1954) A preliminary report on a method of estimating reef fish populations. J Wild Man 18:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock RE (1982) A critique of the visual census method for assessing coral reef fish populations. Bull Mar Sci 32:269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana S (2001) Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. J Fish Biol 59:197–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2008) Coral community structure and risk assessment of high-latitude reefs at Sodwana Bay. S Afr Biodivers Conserv 17:3097–3117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choat J, Bellwood D (1991) Reef fishes: Their history and evolution. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton M, Swearer S (2010) A comparison of two survey methods: differences between underwater visual census and baited remote underwater video. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 400:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvocoresses J, Acosta A (2007) A large-scale field comparison of strip transect and stationary point count methods for conducting length-based underwater visual surveys of reef fish populations. Fish Res 85:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Sousa WP (1983) On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. Am Nat 121:789–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ, McCrea M, Freiwald A (2005) Role of cold-water Lophelia pertusa coral reefs as fish habitat in the NE Atlantic. Fish Bull 105:771–805

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Martini EE (1993) Modeling the potential of fishery reserves for managing coral reef fishes. US Fish Bull 3:414–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens LC, Goatley CHR, Tanner JK, Bellwood DR (2011) Quantifying relative diver effects in underwater visual censuses. PLoS One 6:e18965

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar G (2004) Biases associated with the use of underwater visual census techniques to quantify the density and size-structure of fish populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 308:269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English S, Wilkinson C, Baker V (1994) Survey manual for tropical marine resources. Australian Institute for Marine Science, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1991) Statistical power and design requirements for environmental monitoring. Aust J Ecol Mar Freshwat Res 42:555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francour P, Liret C, Harvey E (1999) Comparison of fish abundance estimates made by remote underwater video and visual census. Nat Sicil 23:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill CT, Lyczkowski-Schultz J, Rademacher K, Kargard E, Crist G, Grace MA (1996) Evaluation of video and acoustic index methods for assessing reef-fish populations. ICES J Mar Sci 53:483–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RH (1979) Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley-Interscience, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmelin-Vivien ML, Chauvet GHJ (1985) Evaluation visuelle des peuplements et populations de poisons: Methodes et problems. Rev Ecol 40:467–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M, Kendrick G (2004) A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by SCUBA divers and a stereo-video system: Implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance. Mar Freshwat Res 55:573–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey ES, McLaren J, Langlois B, Shortis MR (2010) Influence of range, angle of view, image resolution and image compression on underwater stereo-video measurements: High-definition and broadcast-resolution video cameras compared. Mar Technol Soc J 44:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes TH, Wilson SK, Travers MJ, Langlois TJ, Evans RD, Moore GI, Doublas RA, Shedrawi G, Harvey ES, Kickey K (2013) A comparison of visual- and stereo-video based fish community assessment methods in tropical and temperate marine waters of Western Australia. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 11:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irigoyen AJ, Galvin DE, Venerus LA, Parma AM (2013) Variability in abundance of temperate reef fishes estimated by visual census. Plos One 8(4):e61072

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J, Kirby M, Berger W (2001) Historical fishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jammalamadaka SR, Lund UJ (2006) The effect of wind direction on ozone levels: a case study. Environ Ecol Stat 13:287–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapadadia AS, Chan W, Moye L (2005) Mathematical statistics with applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulbicki M, Cornuet N, Vigioloa L, Wantiez L, Mou-Tham G, Chabanet P (2010) Counting coral reef fishes: interaction between fish life-history traits and transect design. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 387:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois TJ, Harvey ES, Fitzpatrick B, Meeuwig JJ, Shedrawi G, Watson DL (2010) Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transect. Aquat Biol 9:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth RV (2001) Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Am Stat 55:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln-Smith M (1988) Effects of observer swimming speed on sample counts of temperate rocky reef fish assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 43:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone BD, Ayling AM (1998) An investigation of optimum methods and unit sizes for the visual estimation of abundances of some coral reef organisms. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH, Gatson KJ, Lawton JH (1990) Variation in the size of animal populations: Patterns, problems and artefacts. J Anim Ecol 59:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley AC, Ryan L, Coleman MA, Knott NA, Clark G, Taylor MD, Johnston EL (2011) Putting marine sanctuaries into context: a comparison of estuary fish assemblages over multiple levels of protection and modification. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 159:1499–1509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minte-Vera C, de Moura R, Francini-Filho R (2008) Nested sampling: An improved visual-census technique for studying reef fish assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 367:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M (1985) Evaluation of artificial reef concepts in Japan. Bull Mar Sci 37:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan RS, Taylor LR (1980) An evaluation of transects methods for fish census on Hawaiian reefs. Hawaian Cooperative Fishery Unit, University of Hawaii, Manoa

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier D, Leleu K, Mou-Tham G, Guillemot N, Chabanet P (2011) Comparison of visual census and high definition video transects for monitoring coral reef fish assemblages. Fish Res 107:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss B, Pelletier D, Wantiez L (2009) Considering multiple species attributes to understand better the effects of successive changes in protection status on a coral reef fish assemblage. ICES J Mar Sci 66:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priede IG, Merrett NR (1996) Estimation of abundance of abyssal demersal fishes: a comparison of data from trawls and baited cameras. J Fish Biol 49:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay PJ, Mason TR (1990) Development of a type zoning model for Zululand coral reefs, Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Afr J Coast Res 6:829–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner BA (2000) Fundamentals of biostatistics. Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham D, Underwood AJ, Chapman MG, Gray CA (2007) A strategy for developing scientific sampling tools for fishery-independent surveys of estuarine fish in New South Wales, Australia. ICES J Mar Sci 64:1512–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF (1991) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF, Sharp BJ (1983) Correction for bias in visual transect censuses of coral reef fish. Coral Reefs 2:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoilys MA (1997) Underwater visual census surveys. In: Samoilys MA (ed) Manual for assessing fish stocks on Pacific coral reefs. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Samoilys MA, Carlos G (2000) Determining methods of underwater visual census for estimating the abundance of coral reef fishes. Environ Biol Fish 57:289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleyer MH, Celliers L (2005) Modelling reef zonation in the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park, South Africa. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 63:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt EF, Sluka RD, Sullivan-Sealey KM (2002) Evaluating the use of roving diver and transect surveys to assess the coral reef fish assemblages off southeastern Hispaniola. Coral Reefs 21: 216-223

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communications. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • South African Department of Labour (1993) Occupational health and safety act diving regulations. South African Government Notice, Act no. 85. Department of Labour, Pretoria

  • Stewart-Oaten AA (1996) Problems in the analysis of environmental monitoring data. In: Schmitt RJ, Osenberg CW (eds) Detection of ecological impacts: conceptual issues and application in coastal marine habitats. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 109–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Oaten AA, Murdock WW, Walde SJ (1995) Estimation of temporal variability. Am Nat 146:519–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier E, Chabanet P, Pothin K, Soria M (2005) Visual censuses of tropical fish aggregations on artificial reefs: slate versus video recording techniques. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 315:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L (1996) Monitoring long-term population change: why are there so many analysis methods? Ecology 77:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE, Gunn S (1986) Comparative analysis of visual census techniques for highly mobile, reef-associated piscivores (Carangidae). Environ Biol Fish 17:93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1993) The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programs to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Aust J Ecol 18:99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (2003) Power, precaution, Type II error and sampling design in assessment of environmental impacts. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 296:49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson RA, Quinn TJ (1997) Performance of transect and point count underwater visual census methods. Ecol Model 104:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DL, Harvey ES, Anderson MJ, Kendrick GA (2005) A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Mar Biol 148:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DL, Harvey ES, Fitzpatrick BM, Langlois TJ (2010) Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: How do different stereo-video techniques compare? Mar Biol 157:1237–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D (1991) Patterns and processes in the distribution of coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 437–474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams ID, Walsh WJ, Tissot LE, Hallacher LE (2006) Impact of observers’ experience level on counts of fishes in underwater visual surveys. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 310:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams ID, Richards BL, Sandin SA (2011) Differences in reef fish assemblages between populated and remote reefs spanning multiple archipelagos across the central and western Pacific. J Mar Biol Article ID 826234

  • Willis TJ (2001) Visual census methods underestimate density and diversity of cryptic reef fishes. J Fish Biol 59:1408–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis TJ, Babcock RC (2000) A baited underwater video system for the determination of relative density of carnivorous reef fish. Mar Freshwat Res 51:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SK, Fisher R, Pratchett MS (2008) Exploitation and habitat degradation as agents of change within coral reef fish communities. Glob Chang Biol 14:2796–2809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller D, Russ GR (2000) Population estimates and size structure of Plectropomus leopardus (Pisces: Serranidae) in relation to no-fishing zones: mark-release-resighting and underwater visual census. Mar Freshwat Res 51:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa’s African Coelacanth Ecosystem Programme and Rhodes University’s Research Committee. The iSimangaliso Wetland Park is thanked for allowing research access. Matt Parkinson, Denham Parker and team from Triton Diving assisted with the diving and associated logistics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, P. O. Box 94, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa

    R. Wartenberg & A. J. Booth

Authors
  1. R. Wartenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. J. Booth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Booth.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 348 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wartenberg, R., Booth, A.J. Video transects are the most appropriate underwater visual census method for surveying high-latitude coral reef fishes in the southwestern Indian Ocean. Mar Biodiv 45, 633–646 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-014-0262-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-014-0262-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation