Skip to main content
Log in

Technologies and complexities as reflected in small cast iron fragments recovered from medieval sites in eastern Mongolia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technological innovation often occurs in unexpected places far from the origin of pertinent invention. This may be prompted by a range of factors including constrained access to human, material, or informational resources as might be expected during periods of political change and uncertainty. Such experiments in both technique and technology can be a useful way to promote multiple options and flexibility in production, especially given shifting sociopolitical settings. A clear example of this case was observed based on cast iron fragments recovered from several medieval period sites within the Delgerkhaan Uul area of eastern Mongolia. These fragments were consistently small in size and mostly irregular in shape, suggesting no specific usage of practical value in the local steppe environment. However, results from visual, microstructural, compositional, and radiocarbon analyses produced strong evidence that cast iron objects, both of medieval and earlier periods, were collected to serve as a raw material for further treatments evidently in small-scale steelmaking processes. While the production of small amounts of high-quality steel was the end goal of these treatments, significant differences visible in microstructures indicate that the process was not standardized and subject to substantial variation. These results suggest a technological environment characterized by the use of non-local cast iron materials subjected to micro-steelmaking under non-standardized processing conditions. We interpret this unique technology as an example of nomadic steppe communities innovating within the constraints of their local geographical, technological, and sociopolitical setting to maintain flexible alternatives during a period of sociopolitical transformation and uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amartuvshin C, Sasada T, Eregzen G, Usuki I, Isheren L (2012) Khustyn Bulagiin dursgalt gazart ilersen tomoriin khuder khailuulakh bolon vaar shataakh zuukhny on tsagiin asuudald. Arkheologiin Sudlal 32:213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood C (2014) Banner, Otog, thousand: appanage communities as the basic unit of traditional Mongolian society. Mongolian Stud XXXIV:1–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeychurch W (2013) The nomad as state builder: historical theory and material evidence from Mongolia. J World Prehist 26(4):283–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeychurch W (2014) Alternative complexities: the archaeology of pastoral nomadic states. J Archaeol Res 22:277–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeychurch W (2015) Inner Asia and the spatial politics of empire: archaeology, mobility, and culture contact. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L (2009) Urban landscape and politics: the making of Liao cities in southeast Inner Mongolia, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

  • Ishtseren L, Sasada T (2014) Khunnugiin toriin khuder khailuulakh zuukhny sudalgaany zarim asuudal. Arkheologiin Sudlal 34:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Kradin N, Ivliev A (2008) Deported nation: the fate of Bohai peoples of Mongolia. Antiquity 82:438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osawa M (2005) One of the forms of iron producing in the Mongol Empire obtained from forge-related objects found at Avarag site. Approach based on metallurgical study. In: Kato S, Shiraishi N (eds) The Avarag site. Preliminary report of the excavations of the palace of Genghis Khan in Mongolia 2001–2004. Kokugakuin University, pp 45–62

  • Park JS (2015) The implication of varying 14C concentrations in carbon samples extracted from Mongolian iron objects of the Mongol period. J Archaeol Sci 63:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Reichert S (2015) Technological tradition of the Mongol Empire as inferred from bloomery and cast iron objects excavated in Karakorum. J Archaeol Sci 53:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Chunag A, Gelegdorj E (2008) A technological transition in Mongolia evident in microstructure, chemical composition and radiocarbon age of cast iron artifacts. J Archaeol Sci 35:2465–2470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Eregzen G, Yeruul-Erdene C (2010) Technological traditions inferred from iron artefacts of the Xiongnu Empire in Mongolia. J Archaeol Sci 37:2689–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Honeychurch W, Chunag A (2017) Iron technology and medieval nomadic communities of eastern Mongolia. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 11:555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0553-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Honeychurch W, Chunag A (2019a) Novel micro-scale steelmaking from molten cast iron practiced in medieval nomadic communities of east Mongolia. Archaeometry 61(1):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Honeychurch W, Chunag A (2019b) The technological and chronological implication of 14C concentrations in carbon samples extracted from Mongolian cast iron artifacts. Radiocarbon 61(3):831–843. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2019.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl E, Mönkhbayar L, Ahrens B, Frank K, Linzen S, Osinska A, Schüler T, Schneider M (2012) Production sites in Karakorum and its environment: a new archaeological project in the Orkhon Valley, Mongolia. The Silk Road 10:49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers JD (2012) Inner Asian states and empires: theories, data, and synthesis. J Archaeol Res 20:205–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostoker W, Bronson B (1990) Pre-industrial iron: its technology and ethnology. Archaeomaterials, monograph 1. University Museum Publications, Philadelphia Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasada T, Ishtseren L (2012) Chingis Khaany Ikh Ord “Avargyn balgas” daxi tomorlog uildverleliin asuudald. Arkheologiin Sudlal 32:268–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraishi N (2012) Nuudelchdiin tor uls uussen bii bolkhod tomor noloolson ni. Ikh Mongol ulsyn ueiin niigem uls tor, tomorlogiin asuudald. Acta Hist 8:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraishi N, Tsogtbaatar B (2009) A preliminary report on the Japanese-Mongolian joint archaeological excavation at Avarag Site: The Great Ordu of Chinggis Khan. In: Bemmann J, Parzinger H, Pohl E, Tseveendorzh D (eds) Current archaeological research in Mongolia. Papers from the First International conference on “Archaeological Research in Mongolia” held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th–23rd, 2007. Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology 4. Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, pp 549–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsogtbaatar B, Ishtseren L, Miyake T, Sasada T, Batbold G, Obata K, Shiraishi N (2017) Avargyn balgasaas shineer oldson darkhany zuukh. Arkheologiin Sudlal 36:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DB (1996) Iron and steel in ancient China. E.J. Brill, Leiden·New York·Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DB (2008) Part 11: Ferrous metallurgy. In: Needham J (ed) Science and civilization in China, volume 5 chemistry and chemical technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The DMS project would not have been possible without the generous collaboration of the Institute of History and Archeology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences. We express our sincere gratitude to the families of Delgerkhaan Uul whose hospitality and knowledge have helped us immensely.

Funding

The analysis and research presented was financially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A2B4002082) and by the U.S. National Endowment for the Humanities (Grant RZ-249831-16).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jang-Sik Park.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, JS., Honeychurch, W. & Chunag, A. Technologies and complexities as reflected in small cast iron fragments recovered from medieval sites in eastern Mongolia. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 12, 75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01030-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01030-4

Keywords

Navigation