Abstract
Background
Various differences between China and Japan in approaches to medical treatment have been noted, but a few studies have examined differences in medical decision-making, especially in neonatal care. The aim of this study was to clarify these differences by means of a questionnaire.
Methods
The subjects were physicians on the staff of NICUs in China and Japan. The study questionnaire consisted of three parts dealing with the general characteristics of the participants, questions about treatment strategies for hypothetical, critically ill infants, and general questions about the treatment of foreign patients. The Likert scale was used to assess the treatment strategies and the results were analyzed statistically. Subgroup analysis by age, sex, and medical and NICU experience was also performed.
Results
The proportion of respondents in the Chinese and Japanese groups was 26/26 (100%) and 26/31 (84%), respectively. There was a significant difference between the Chinese and Japanese groups for 8 of 75 questions; Chinese physicians chose the positive treatment or examination options for these eight questions unlike their Japanese counterparts. The responses of the younger, less experienced physicians in both countries were more similar to each other, and more positive than those of their older, more experienced colleagues.
Conclusion
Chinese physicians showed a more positive attitude toward examination and treatment, whereas Japanese physicians showed a more cautious attitude.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage Publications; 2001.
Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hils: Sage Publications; 1980. p. 475.
Martinsons MG, Davison RM. Strategic decision making and support systems: comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decis Support Syst. 2007;43:284–300.
Rowe AJ, Boulgarides JD. Decision styles-a perspective. Leadersh Org Dev J. 1983;4:3–9.
Fu R, Noguchi H. Does marriage make us healthier? Inter-country comparative evidence from China, Japan, and Korea. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148990.
Liu S, Liu C, Cao X, Shang B, Chen A, Liu B. The difference in the attitude of Chinese and Japanese college students regarding deceased organ donation. Transpl Proc. 2013;45:2098–101.
Park HL, Lee HS, Shin BC, Liu JP, Shang Q, Yamashita H, et al. Traditional medicine in china, Korea, and Japan: a brief introduction and comparison. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2012;2012:429103.
Zhao LB, Miyachi S, Shi HB, Suh DC. Comparison of medical education and requirements for training in the interventional neuroradiology in China, Japan and Korea. Neurointervention. 2013;8:3–8.
Haug S, Goldstein M, Cummins D, Fayard E, Merritt TA. Using patient-centered care after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: a review. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:382–7.
Zhang ZQ, Zhong Y, Huang XM, Du LZ. Airway administration of corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17:207.
Sohn B, Park S, Park IK, Kim YT, Park JD, Park SH, et al. Lung volume reduction surgery for respiratory failure in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2018;141:S395–8.
Volbers B, Herrmann S, Willfarth W, Lucking H, Kloska SP, Doerfler A, et al. Impact of hypothermia initiation and duration on perihemorrhagic edema evolution after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:2249–55.
Kieling CO, Hallal C, Spessato CO, Ribeiro LM, Breyer H, Goldani HA, et al. Changing pattern of indications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children and adolescents: a twelve-year experience. World J Pediatr. 2015;11:154–9.
Khairullar DH, Khairullar ZY. Cultural values and decision-making in China. Int J Bus Humanit Technol. 2013;3:1–11.
Gutierrez SM, Mizota T, Rakue Y. Comparison of four health systems: Cuba, China, Japan and the USA, an approach to reality. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34:937–46.
Acknowledgements
We thank the participants for responding to the questionnaire. We also thank Mr. James R. Valera for his assistance with editing this manuscript.
Funding
None declared
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HM conceived this study, constructed the questionnaire, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft. YukS, XX, YunS, and SH helped to construct the questionnaire. YI supervised the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This research was approved by the ethical review board of the National Center for Child Health and Development and Guangdong General Hospital.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maruyama, H., Shibata, Y., Xia, XG. et al. Comparison of decision-making in neonatal care between China and Japan. World J Pediatr 15, 85–91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0211-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0211-1