Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a decade’s experience from one center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) is one of the most common anomalies in newborns, and accounting for nearly half of all cases of neonatal intestinal obstruction. This study aimed to review our single-center experience in managing congenital duodenal obstruction while evaluate the outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the records of all neonates dianogsed with congenital duodenal obstruction admitted to our center between January 2003 and December 2012. We analyzed demographic criteria, clinical manifestations, associated anomalies, radiologic findings, surgical methods, postoperative complications, and final outcomes.

Results

The study comprised 287 newborns (193 boys and 94 girls). Birth weight ranged from 950 g to 4850 g. Fifty-three patients were born prematurely between 28 and 36 weeks’ gestation. Malrotation was diagnosed in 174 patients, annular pancreas in 66, duodenal web in 55, duodenal atresia or stenosis in 9, preduodenal portal vein in 2, and congenital band compression in 1. Twenty patients had various combinations of these conditions. Presenting symptoms included bilious vomiting, dehydration, and weight loss. X-rays of the upper abdomen demonstrated the presence of a typical double-bubble sign or air-fluid levels in 68.64% of patients, and confirmatory upper and/or lower gastrointestinal contrast studies were obtained in 64.11%. Multiple associated abnormalities were observed in 50.52% of the patients. Various surgical approaches were used, including Ladd’s procedure, duodenoplasty, duodenoduodenostomy, duodenojejunostomy, or a combination of these. Seventeen patients died postoperatively and 14 required re-operation.

Conclusions

Congenital duodenal obstruction is a complex entity with various etiologies and often includes multiple concomitant disorders. Timely diagnosis and aggressive surgery are key to improving prognosis. Care should be taken to address all of the causes of duodenal obstruction and/or associated alimentary tract anomalies during surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lawrence MJ, Ford WD, Furness ME, Hayward T, Wilson T. Congenital duodenal obstruction: early antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int 2000;16:342–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey PV, Tracy TF Jr, Connors RH, Mooney DP, Lewis JE, Weber TR. Congenital duodenal obstruction: a 32-year review. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:92–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mustafawi AR, Hassan ME. Congenital duodenal obstruction in children: a decade’s experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2008;18:93–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ladd WE. Congenital duodenal obstruction. Surgery 1937;1:878–885.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaddah SN, Bahaa-Aldin KHK, Aly HF, Hassan HS. Congenital duodenal obstruction. Ann Pediatr Surg 2006;2:130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bittencourt DG, Barini R, Marba S, Sbragia L. Congenital duodenal obstruction: does prenatal diagnosis improve the outcome? Pediatr Surg Int 2004;20:582–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilbride H, Castor C, Andrews W. Congenital duodenal obstruction: timing of diagnosis during the newborn period. J Perinatol 2010;30:197–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Q, Chen Y, Hou D, Guo W. Analysis of postoperative reoperation for congenital duodenal obstruction. Asian J Surg 2005;28:38–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grosfeld JL, Rescorla FJ. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathologic variance, and long term follow-up. World J Surg 1993;17:301–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Romero R, Ghidini A, Costigan K, Touloukian R, Hobbins JC. Perinatal diagnosis of duodenal atresia: does it make any difference? Obstct Gynecol 1988;71:739–741.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Phelps S, Fisher R, Partington A, Dykes E. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of gastrointestinal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:438–440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawrence MJ, Ford WD, Furness ME, Hayward T, Wilson T. Congenital duodenal obstruction: early antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int 2000;16:342–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen-Overbeek TE, Grijseels EW, Niemeijer ND, Hop WC, Wladimiroff JW, Tibboel D. Isolated or non-isolated duodenal obstruction: perinatal outcome following prenatal or postnatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:784–792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spigland N, Yazbeck S. Complications associated with surgical treatment of congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:1127–1130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang XW, Abudoureyimu A, Zhang TC, Zhao JR, Fu LB, Lin F, et al. Tapering duodenoplasty and gastrojejunostomy in the management of idiopathic megaduodenum in children. J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:1038–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexander F, Difiore J, Stallion A. Triangular tapered duodenoplasty for the treatment of congenital duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:862–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Gupta PK, Smith C, Keshavarzian A. Laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:48–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill S, Koontz CS, Langness SM, Wulkan ML. Laparoscopic versus open repair of congenital duodenal obstruction in infants. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:961–963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rothenberg SS. Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy for duodenal obstruction in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 2002;3:1088–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spilde TL, St Peter SD, Keckler SJ, Holcomb GW 3rd, Snyder CL, Ostlie DJ. Open vs laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstructions: a concurrent series. J Pediatr Surg 2008;43:1002–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kay S, Yoder S, Rothenberg S. Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:906–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li B, Chen WB, Zhou WY. Laparoscopic methods in the treatment of congenital duodenal obstruction for neonates. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:881–884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen AR, Short SS, Anselmo DM, Torres MB, Frykman PK, Shin CE, et al. Laparoscopic versus open treatment of congenital duodenal obstruction: multicenter short-term outcomes analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:876–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burgmeier C, Schier F. The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of duodenal obstruction in term and preterm infants. Pediatr Surg Int 2012;28:997–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagendoorn J, Vieira-Travassos D, van der Zee D. Laparoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation in neonates and infants: retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2011;25:217–220.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mooney D, Lewis JE, Connors RH, Weber TR. Newborn duodenal atresia: an improving outlook. Am J Surg 1987;153:347–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Escobar MA, Ladd AP, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Scherer LR 3rd, et al. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: long-term follow-up over 30 years. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:867–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Niramis R, Anuntkosol M, Tongsin A, Mahatharadol V. Influence of Down’s syndrome on management and outcome of patients with congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1467–1472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric General Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University Shool of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Qing-Jiang Chen, Zhi-Gang Gao, Jin-Fa Tou, Yun-Zhong Qian, Min-Ju Li & Qi-Xing Xiong

  2. Department of Pediatric Thoracic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University Shool of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Qiang Shu

  3. Department of Pediatric Thoracic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University Shool of Medicine, 57 Zhugan Xiang, Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Qiang Shu

Authors
  1. Qing-Jiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhi-Gang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin-Fa Tou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yun-Zhong Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min-Ju Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qi-Xing Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiang Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Shu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, QJ., Gao, ZG., Tou, JF. et al. Congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a decade’s experience from one center. World J Pediatr 10, 238–244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-014-0499-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-014-0499-4

Key words

Search

Navigation