Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How biofertilizers and intercropping pattern affect yield and nitrogen efficiency indices of maize?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-consecutive year study is aimed at investigating the effect of organic or biofertilizer and intercropping pattern on quantitative or qualitative yield and agronomic efficiency indices of maize. The main plots consisted of four fertilizer systems: control (urea, 30 kg ha−1), biofertilizer (Azotobacter chroococcum), organic fertilizer (vermicompost), and integrated fertilizer (Azotobacter + vermicompost), and subplots comprised five cropping patterns: monocropping of maize, intercropping of 50% mazie-50% pinto bean, 60% maize-60% pinto beans, and 80% maize-80% pinto beans. The studied parameters consisted of grain yield, biomass, agronomic efficiency (AE), apparent recovery efficiency (ARE), physiological efficiency (PE), agro-physiological efficiency (APE), and nitrogen (N) utilization efficiency (NUE). For both the first and second years, the results indicated that fertilizer type and cropping pattern significantly affected AE, ARE, PE, APE, and NUE (P ≤ 0.01). Based on the results of the first year, the highest grain yield (15.4 t ha−1), biomass (31.6 t ha−1), and NUE (2.6 kg kg−1) belonged to the monocropping of maize under integrated fertilizer treatment of Azotobacter + vermicompost. In the case of the second year, in accordance with the obtained results, the highest grain yield (15.2 t ha−1) and biomass (32.2 t ha−1) were observed in monocropping of maize under integrated fertilizer treatment of Azotobacter + vermicompost. According to the results mentioned above, intercropping patterns, integrated plant nutrition with bio/organic fertilizer and also nitrogen fixation potential, can be considered the effective factors reducing the application of chemical fertilizers and achieving sustainable agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be available according to request to the corresponding author.

References   

  • Ahmad S, Wang GY, Muhammad I, Chi YX, Zeeshan M, Nasar J et al (2022) Interactive effects of melatonin and nitrogen improve drought tolerance of maize seedlings by regulating growth and physiochemical attributes. Antioxidants 11:359. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar M, Patra DD, Chand S, Alpesh K, Naqvi AA, Khanuja SPS (2005) Effects of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation, and oil quality of French basil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:1737–1746

    Google Scholar 

  • Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Welch C, Metzeger JD (2004) Influences of vermicomposts on field strawberries effects on growth and yields. Biores Technol 93:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyeh RM, Arancon N, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2002) Influence of earthworm- processed organic wastes on plant growth. Biores Technol 84:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Azarpoor E, Moradi M, Bozorgi HR (2012) Effect of Vermicompost application and seed inoculation with biological nitrogen fertilizer under different plant densities in Soybean (Glycin max L cultivar, Williams. Afr J Agric Res 7:1534–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakry BA, Elewa TA, El-Kramany MF, Wali A (2013) Effect of humic and ascorbic acids foliar application on yield and yield components of two wheat cultivars grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Int J Agron Plant Prod 4(6):1125–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS (2006) Wheat and chickpea intercropping systemes in additive series experiment: advantages and smothering. European J Agron 24:324–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashan Y, Holguin G, de Bashan L (2004) Azospirillum-plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural and environmental. Can J Microbiol 50:521–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudjabi S, Chenchouni H (2021) On the sustainability of land applications of sewage sludge: how to apply the sewage biosolid in order to improve soil fertility and increase crop yield? Chemosphere 282:131122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudjabi S, Chenchouni H (2023) Comparative effectiveness of exogenous organic amendments on soil fertility, growth, photosynthesis, and heavy metal accumulation in cereal crops. Heliyon 9(4):e14615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudjabi S, Kribaa M, Chenchouni H (2015) Growth, physiology and yield of durum wheat (Triticum durum) treated with sewage sludge under water stress conditions. EXCLI J 14:320–334. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2014-715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudjabi S, Kribaa M, Chenchouni H (2019) Sewage sludge fertilization alleviates drought stress and improves physiological adaptation and yield performances in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum): a double-edged sword. J King Saud Univ-Sci 31:336

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavender ND, Atiyeh RM, Knee M (2003) Vermicompost stimulates mycorrhizal colonization of roots of sorghum bicolor at the expense of plant growth. Pedobiologia 47:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenchouni H, Mekahlia MN, Beddiar A (2020) Effect of inoculation with native and commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and mycorrhizal colonization of olive (Olea europaea L). Scientia Horticulturae 261:108969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, Amon T, Kaul HP (2011) Competition and yield in intercrops maize and sunflower for biogas. Ind Crops Prod 34:1203–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Danso S, Pálmason F, Hardarson G (1993) Is nitrogen transferred between field crops? examining the question through a sweet-blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.)-oats (Avena sativa L.) intercrop. Soil Bi Biochem 25:1135–1137

    Google Scholar 

  • Das AC, Saha D (2000) Influence of diastrophic inoculations on nitrogen of rice. Aust J Soil Res 41(8):1543–1554

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekak A, Menasria T, Benhizia Y, Chenchouni H (2020) Endophytic passenger bacteria associated with Genista cinerea nodules growing in North African drylands. Rhizosphere 14:100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan TT, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Rumpel C, Janeau JL, Jouquet P (2015) Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in Northern Vietnam: a three year mesocosm experiment. Sci Total Environ 514:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Dordas CA (2011) Nitrogen nutrition index and its relationship to N use efficiency in linseed. Agron J 34:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Burrows I (1998) The potential of earthworm composts as plant growth media. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Publication CO, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Fageria NK, Barbosa Filho MP, Stone LF (2004) Phosphorus nutrition of common bean. In: Yamada V, Abdalla SRS (eds) Phosphorus in Brazilian Agriculture, Brazilian Potassium and Phosphorus Research Institute, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp 435–455

  • Fayazi H, Abdali Mashhadi AR, Koochak Zadeh A, Papzan AA, Arzanesh MH (2014) Evaluation of Echinacea (Echinacea purpurea L.) medicinal plant response to the usage of organic and biological fertilizers. The Second National Conference of Medicinal Plants and Sustainable Agriculture, 21 Aug 2014, Hamedan, Iran, pp 1‒7. https://www.symposia.ir/HHMM02

  • Galanopoulou K, Lithourgidis AS, Dordas CA (2019) Intercropping of faba bean with barley at various spatial arrangements affects dry matter and n yield, nitrogen nutrition index, and interspecific competition. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 47:1116–1127. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47111520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallais A, Coque M (2005) Genetic variation and selection for nitrogen use efficiency in maize, a synthesis. Maydica 50:531–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaley BBBB, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Høgh-Jensen H, Jensen ESS (2005) Intercropping of wheat and pea as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 73:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunes A, Bagci EG, Inal A (2007) Inter specific facilitative root interactions and rhizosphere effects on phosphorus and Iron nutrition between mixed grown chickpea and barley. J Plant Nutr 30:1455–1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crop Res 70:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinzadeh SR, Amiri H, Ismaili A (2016) Effect of vermicompost fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. Photosynthetica 54(1):87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain A, Arshad M, Husain A, Husain E (1987) Response of maize (Zea mays L) to Azotobacter inoculation under fertilized and unfertilized conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 4:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahan M, Nasiri Mahallati M (2012) Soil fertility and biofertilizers (An Agroecological Approach). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press publication, p 250

  • Vandermeer J (1992) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, p 237

  • Jensen ES (1996) Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 182:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan D C (2008) Intercropping with maize in sub-arid regions. Community planning and Analysis. Definition and benefits of intercropping. Technical Brief. April, 16

  • Kapulnik Y, Sarig S, Nur A, Okon Y, Henis Y (1982) The effect of Azospirillum priming on growth and yield of maize. J Bot 31:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan K, Pankaj U, Verma SK, Gupta AK, Singh RP, Verma RK (2015) Bio-inoculants and vermicompost influence on yield, quality of Andrographis paniculata, and soil properties. Ind Crops Prod 70:404–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocheki AR, Lale ghani B, Najib Nia S (2008) Evaluation of intercropping beans and maize production. J Agric Res 7:605–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocheki A, Nassiri Mahallati M, Moradi R, Alizadeh Y (2015) Evaluation of yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize and cotton intercropping under different nitrogen levels. Iran J Field Crop Res 13(1):1–13 ((in Persian with English Summary))

    Google Scholar 

  • Malunga I, Lelei JJ, Makumba W (2018) Effect of mineral nitrogen and legume intercrops on maize (Zea mays L.) nitrogen uptake, nutrient use efficiency and yields in Chitedze and Zomba. Malawi Sustain Agric Res 7:64–79. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v7n1p64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Toledo MV, Gonzalez-Lopez J, de la Rubia T, Moreno J, Ramos-Cormenzana A (1988) Grain yield response of Zea mays (hybrid AE703) to Azotobacter chroococcum H23. Biol Fertil Soils 6:352–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehalaine S, Chenchouni H (2021) New insights for the production of medicinal plant materials: ex vitro and in vitro propagation of valuable Lamiaceae species from northern Africa. Curr Plant Biol 27C:100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammady Aria M, Lakzian A, Haghnia GH, Berenji AR, Besharati H, Fotovat A (2010) Effect of Thiobacillus, sulfur and vermicompost on the water-soluble phosphorus of hard rock phosphate. Biores Technol 101:551–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993) Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: non-nitrogen nutrients. Field Crop Res 34:303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Motesharezadeh B, Mousavi SM (2018) Management of plant nutrition and 100 points in foliar application, University of Tehran, Jihad Publications

  • Naghizadeh M, Ramroudi M, Galavi M, Siahsar BA, Heydari M, Maghsoudi Moud AA (2012) Effect of chemical and biology phosphorus fertilizers on yield and yield components of maize and lathyrus in intercropping. Iran J Crop Sci 43(2):203–215 (in Persian with English Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi N, Mostafaii M, Ousting Sh, Dabagh-e-mohamadi Nasb A (2015) Effect of manure application and intercropping of maize, bean, and biter vetch on macronutrients content in maize shoot. 12th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress. Karaj Brach, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran, https://www.symposia.ir/NABATAT12

  • Nasar J, Wang GY, Ahmad S, Muhammad I, Zeeshan M, Gitari H et al (2022) Nitrogen fertilization coupled with iron foliar application improves the photosynthetic characteristics, photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency, and the related enzymes of maize crops under different planting patterns. Front. Plant Sci 13:988055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.988055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto KF, Frankenberger WT (1991) Influence of adenine, isopenthyle alchole and (Azotobacter chroococcum) on the vegetative growth of Zea mays. Plant Soil 135:213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossom EM (2010) Influence of sweet potato-maize association on ecological properties and crop yield in Swaziland. Int J Agric Biol Eng 12–4:481–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Oustani M, Halilat MT, Chenchouni H (2015) Effect of poultry manure on the yield and nutriments uptake of potato under saline conditions of arid regions. Emirates J Food Agric 27(1):106–120. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v27i1.17971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY, Kumari UR (2008) An experimental study of vermin-biowaste composting for agriculture soil improvement. Biores Technol 99:1672–1681

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam CJ, Okalebo R, Simmonds LP, Gathua KW (1994) Analysis of maize-common bean intercrops in semi-arid Kenya. J Agric Sci 123:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja Sekar K, Karmegan N (2010) Earthworm casts as an alternate carrier material for biofertilizers: Assessment of endurance and viability of Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus megaterium and Rhizobium leguminosarum. Sci Hortic 124:286–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee S, Alikhani H, Raisi F (2007) Effect of growth-promoting potentials of native strains of cacti cocci on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in wheat. Agric Sci Technol Nat Resour 11(41c):285–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezvani Moghaddam P, Moradi R (2012) Assessment of planting date, biological fertilizer and intercropping on yield and essential oil of cumin and fenugreek. Iranian J Field Crop Sci 2:217–230 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramirez J, Hortado M (2006) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L) increases with bio-char additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43(6):699–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage RF, Pearcy RW, Seemann JR (1987) The nitrogen useefficiency of C3 and C4 plants. I. Leaf nitrogen, growth, andbiomass partitioning in Chenopodium album (L.) andAmaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiol 84:954–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafi M, Bakht J, Jan MT, Shah Z (2007) Soil C and N dynamics and maize (Zea mays L.) yield as affected by cropping systems and residue management in North-western Pakistan. Soil Tillage Res 94:520–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinebo W, Gretzmacher R, Edelbauer A (2004) Genotypic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in Ethiopian barley. Field Crops Res 85:43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman S, Seeda MA, Aly SSM, Gadalla AM (1995) Nitrogen fixation by wheat plant as affected by nitrogen fertilizer levels Ana no symbiotic bacteria. Egypt J Soil Sci 35:401–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WS, Soratto RP, Peixoto DS, Campos TS, da Silva MB, Souza AGV et al (2022) Effects of rhizobium inoculum compared with mineral nitrogen fertilizer on nodulation and seed yield of common bean. A Meta-Analysis Agron Sustain Dev 42:52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00784-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancheva I, Dimitrev I, Kuloyanova N, Dimitrova A, Anyelove M (1992) Effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense, photosynthetic enzyme activities and grain yield in maize. Agronomie Journal 12:319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilak KVBR, Singh CS, Roy VK, RaoN SS (1982) Azospirillum brasilense and Azotobacter chroococcum inoculum: effect on yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Soil Biol Biochem 14:417–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2011) 2 Strategies for enhancing grain yield in maize. Plant Breed Rev 34:37

    Google Scholar 

  • Uribelarrea M, Moose SP, Below FE (2007) Divergent selection for grain protein affects nitrogen use in maize hybrids. Field Crop Res 100:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as bio-fertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrignon-Brenas S, Celette F, Piquet-Pissaloux A, Jeuffroy MH, Davi C (2016) Early assessment of ecological services provided by forage legumes in relay intercropping. Eur J Agron 75:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Waling I, Vark WV, Houba VJG, Vanderlee JJ (1989) Soil and plant analysis, a seris of syllabi. Part 7, Plant Analysis Procedures. Wageningen Agriculture University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Liu C, Dong Q, Huang D, Li C, Li P et al (2018) Genome-wide identification and analysis of apple nitrate transporter 1/peptide transporter family (NPF) genes reveals MdNPF6.5 confers high capacity for nitrogen uptake under low-nitrogen conditions. Int J Mol Sci 19:2761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenxue L, Long L, Jianhao S, Tianwen G, Fusuo Z, Xingguo B, Peng A, Tang C (2005) Effects of intercropping and nitrogen application on nitrate present in the profile of orthic an orthic anthrosolwest China. Agr Ecosyst Environ 105:483–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang H, Zhang Y, Wei H, Zhang JE, Zhao B (2018) Soil properties and carbon and nitrogen pools in a young hillside longan orchard after the introduction of leguminous plants and residues. Peer J 6:e5536. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie K, Li X, He F, Zhang Y, Wan L, David BH, Wang D, Qin Y, Gamal MAF (2015) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield, N content, and nitrogen fixation of alfalfa and smooth bromegrass grown alone or in mixture in greenhouse pots. J Integr Agr 14(9):1864–1876

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahir AZ, Arshad M, Frankenberger WF (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Adv Agron 81:97–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are thankful to the University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran for providing financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Reza Fatemi: investigation. Dr. Seyed Mohammad Bagher Hosseini: conceptualization, methodology, and supervision. Dr. Hosain Moghadam: co-supervisor and formal analysis. Prof. Babak Motesharezadeh: advisor and writing—review. Dr. Zahra Ahmadabadi: writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Motesharezadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Haroun Chenchouni

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatemi, R., Hoseini, S.M.B., Moghadam, H. et al. How biofertilizers and intercropping pattern affect yield and nitrogen efficiency indices of maize?. Arab J Geosci 16, 378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11450-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11450-w

Keywords

Navigation