Skip to main content
Log in

Development of water quality management strategies for an urban river reach: A case study of the river Yamuna, Delhi, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The urban reach of River Yamuna at Delhi is contaminated with a high volume of wastewater inflows amounting to a flow of about 3600 MLD consisting of BOD as high as 200 mg/l entering through sixteen outfalling drains within the 22 km of reach. The present study intended to develop water quality management approaches to bring out the BOD and DO concentrations within the prescribed limits. Four different scenarios with twelve cases have been developed to attain this objective. The model QUAL2Kw was calibrated and validated with secondary data. RMSE values were determined to validate the predicted and observed values. Four scenarios, including bottom algal modification, pollutant load modification, pollutant load modification with diversion, and diversion with flow augmentation, were assessed for February 2019 with low flow conditions. The study showed that flow augmentation and diversion of some drains (D1, D11, D12, D13) could ensure the required criteria for BOD < 3 mg/l throughout the reach. At 33 km from upstream, local oxygenation was required to maintain DO above 4 mg/l. Advanced treatment in drain 1 and diversion of a few smaller drains can also maintain the required standards. Results indicated that the reach required a combination of bottom algal reduction, flow augmentation, load modification, and local oxygenation to sustain the river quality. The present study attempts to develop a novel strategy for river water management under different scenarios for the urban reach of the Yamuna River, which is almost anoxic after outfalling drain 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset analyzed during the present study are available in the CPCB (www.cpcb.nic.in/water/water quality of Yamuna River) DPCC domain (Delhi Pollution Control Committee (delhigovt.nic.in/water/analysis report). Some data were collected by personal communication from DPCC, CWC classified data, and IF&C, which may not be available.

References

  • Abbas MA, Iqbal M, Tauqeer HM, Turan V, Farhad M (2022) Chapter 16 - Microcontaminants in wastewater. In M. Z. Hashmi, S. Wang, & Z. Ahmed (Eds.), Environmental Micropollutants (pp. 315–329). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90555-8.00018-0

  • Bhargava DS (1985) Water quality variations and control technology of Yamuna River. Environmental Pollution. Series A, Ecological and Biological, 37(4), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-1471(85)90124-2

  • Chapra (1997) Surface water modelling., McGrill Hill Publications

  • Cho JH, Lee JH (2019) Automatic calibration and selection of optimal performance criterion of a water quality model for a river controlled by total maximum daily load (TMDL). Water Sci Technol 79(12):2260–2270. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox B (2003) NA review of currently available in-stream water-quality models and their applicability for simulating dissolved oxygen in lowland rivers Title. Sci Total Environ, 314–316(October 2006), 335–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00063-9

  • CPCB (2006) Water quality status of Yamuna River, assessment and development of river basin. Basin Seri(ADSORBS/41/2006-07). www.cpcb.nic.in

  • CPCB (2008) Status of water quality in India- 2007. Monitoring of Indian national aquatic resources, series: MINARS/ 29 /2008–2009, July 2008, 1–247. http://www.cpcb.nic.in/WQ_Status_Report2012.pdf

  • CPCB (2009) Annual Report 15(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.12.001

  • Cristea NC, Burges SJ (2010) An assessment of the current and future thermal regimes of three streams located in the Wenatchee River basin, Washington State: some implications for regional river basin systems. Clim Chang 102(3):493–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9700-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darajati Setiawan A, Widyastuti M, Pramono Hadi M (2018) Water quality modeling for pollutant carrying capacity assessment using Qual2Kw in Bedog river. Indonesian J Geogr, 50(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.16429

  • Deksissa T, Meirlaen J, Ashton PJ, Vanrolleghem PA (2004) Simplifying dynamic river water quality modelling: a case study of inorganic nitrogen dynamics in the Crocodile River (South Africa). Water Air Soil Pollut 155(1):303–320. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000026548.20608.a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshorbagy A, Teegavarapu RSV, Ormsbee L (2005) Total maximum daily load (TMDL) approach to surface water quality management: concepts, issues, and applications. https://doi.org/10.1139/L04-107

  • Ghosh S, Mujumdar PP (2010) Fuzzy waste load allocation model: a multiobjective approach. J Hydroinf 12(1):83–96. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2010.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greogory Plettier, Steven Chapra, H. tao. (2006). QUAL2Kw – a framework for modeling water quality in streams and rivers using a genetic algorithm for calibration Environmental Modelling and Software, 21(3), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.002

  • Hobson AJ, Neilson BT, von Stackelberg N, Shupryt M, Ostermiller J, Pelletier G, Chapra SC (2015) Development of a minimalistic data collection strategy for QUAL2Kw. J Water Resour Plann Manag, 141(8). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000488

  • Jaiswal M, Hussain J, Gupta SK, Nasr M, Nema AK (2019) Comprehensive evaluation of water quality status for entire stretch of Yamuna River, India. Environ Monit Assess, 191(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7312-8

  • Jim Carroll, Sarah O’Neal, and S. G (n.d.) Wenatchee River Basin dissolved oxygen, pH, and phosphorus total maximum daily load study. In Washington State Department of Ecology, April 2006 Publication No. 06–03–018 (Issue 06)

  • Kazmi AA, Hansen IS (1997) Numerical models in water quality management: a case study for the Yamuna River (India). Water Sci Technol 36(5):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00474-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil M, Iqbal M, Turan V, Tauqeer HM, Farhad M, Ahmed A, Yasin S (2022) Chapter 11 - Household chemicals and their impact. In M. Z. Hashmi, S. Wang, & Z. Ahmed (Eds.), Environmental Micropollutants (pp. 201–232). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90555-8.00022-2

  • Kori BB, Shashidhar T, Mise S (2013) Application of automated QUAL2Kw for water quality modeling in the River Karanja. India 2(2):193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestari H, Haribowo R, Yuliani E (2019) Determination of pollution load capacity using QUAL2Kw program on The Musi River Palembang. II(02), 105–116

  • McIntyre NRHSW (2004) A tool for risk-based management of surface water quality. Environ Modell Softw 19(12):1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson BT, Hobson AJ, VonStackelberg N, Shupryt M, Ostermiller J (2013) Using Qual2K modeling to support nutrient criteria development and wasteload analyses in Utah. 1–49

  • Nikoo MR, Beiglou PHB, Mahjouri N (2016) Optimizing multiple-pollutant waste load allocation in rivers: an interval parameter game theoretic model. Water Resour Manage 30(12):4201–4220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1415-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitin Shankar Deshpande (2019) Before the National Green Tribunal Principal Bench. New Delhi 04:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira B, Bola J, Quinteiro P, Nadais H, Arroja L (2012) Application of Qual2Kw model as a tool for water quality management: Cértima River as a case study. Environ Monit Assess 184(10):6197–6210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2413-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paliwal R, Sharma P (2007) Application of QUAL2E for the river Yamuna: to assess the impact of point loads and to recommend measures to improve water quality of the river. Environment 2702

  • Paliwal R, Sharma P, Kansal A (2007) Water quality modeling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS. J Environ Manage 83(2):131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar DL, Keshari AK (2014a) Wasteload allocation using wastewater treatment and flow augmentation. Environ Model Assess 19(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-013-9378-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar DL, Keshari AK (2014b) Wasteload allocation using wastewater treatment and flow augmentation GIS-coupled numerical modeling for sustainable groundwater development: case study of Aynalem Well Field, Ethiopia View project wasteload allocation using wastewater treatment and flow augmentation. Article in Environmental Modeling and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-013-9378-y

  • Pelletier G, Chapra S (2008a) A modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality. Environmental Assessment Program Olympia, Washington 98504–7710

  • Pelletier G, Chapra S (2008b) A modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality July 2008b Publication No. 08–03-xxx.   http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/04030

  • Raj Kannel P, Lee S, Lee Y, Kanel S, Pelletier G (2007) Application of automated QUAL2Kw for water quality modeling and management in the Bagmati River, Nepalhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.033

  • Santos S, Vilar VJP, Alves P, Boaventura RAR, Botelho C (2013) Water quality in Minho/Miño River (Portugal/Spain). Environ Monit Assess 185(4):3269–3281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2789-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma D (2013) Evaluation of river quality restoration plan and intervention analysis using water quality modeling with focus on the River Yamuna, Delhi (India). Ph.D. Thesis, TERI University, Delhi, India

  • Sharma D, Kansal A, Pelletier Greg (1999) Water quality modeling for urban reach of Yamuna river, India (1999–2009), using QUAL2Kw. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0311-1

  • Sharma D, Kansal A, Pelletier G (2017) Water quality modeling for urban reach of Yamuna river, India (1999–2009), using QUAL2Kw. Appl Water Sci 7(3):1535–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0311-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma MP, Singal SK, Patra S (2009) Water quality profile of Yamuna River, India. Hydro Nepal: J Water Energy Environ 3(3):19–24. https://doi.org/10.3126/hn.v3i0.1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AP, Ghosh SK, Sharma P (2007) Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna: an interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach. Water Resour Manage 21(2):515–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9028-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauqeer HM, Turan V, Farhad M, Iqbal M (2022a) Sustainable agriculture and plant production by virtue of biochar in the era of climate change. In M. Hasanuzzaman, G. J. Ahammed, & K. Nahar (Eds.), Managing plant production under changing environment (pp. 21–42). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5059-8_2

  • Tauqeer HM, Turan V, Iqbal M (2022b) Production of safer vegetables from heavy metals contaminated soils: the current situation, concerns associated with human health and novel management strategies. In J. A. Malik (Ed.), Advances in bioremediation and phytoremediation for sustainable soil management: principles, monitoring and remediation (pp. 301–312). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89984-4_19

  • Turan V, Khan SA, Mahmood-ur-Rahman, Iqbal M, Ramzani PMA, Fatima M (2018) Promoting the productivity and quality of brinjal aligned with heavy metals immobilization in a wastewater irrigated heavy metal polluted soil with biochar and chitosan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 161:409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.082

  • Turner DF, Pelletier GJ, Kasper B (2009) Dissolved oxygen and pH modeling of a periphyton dominated, nutrient enriched river. J Environ Eng 135(8):645–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:8(645)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamuna THE, Monitoring P, Marg MAXM, Estate L (2020) Dated: 21.04.2020. 58, 1–32

  • Zare Farjoudi S, Moridi A, Sarang A (2021) Multi-objective waste load allocation in river system under inflow uncertainty. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18(6):1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02897-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to CWC, DPCC, and IF&C for providing data. The authors are grateful to the reviewers for giving their valuable time and suggestions to improve the quality of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nibedita Verma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Amjad Kallel

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, N., Singh, G. & Ahsan, N. Development of water quality management strategies for an urban river reach: A case study of the river Yamuna, Delhi, India. Arab J Geosci 15, 1767 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11030-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11030-4

Keywords

Navigation