Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the novel circulant singular spectrum analysis ensemble model for forecasting of streamflow data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of streamflow is an important part of water resource management and a difficult job for engineers. In this study, a circulant singular spectrum analysis (CiSSA)-based novel approach for forecasting daily streamflow data is proposed. Obtained features using CiSSA methods are applied to support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models. In addition, the variational mode decomposition (VMD) method was used for preprocessing the streamflow data and to compare the performance of the CiSSA method.

One to five-day ahead forecasting performance was investigated and compared with single SVR, RF, ANN single models. VMD-SVR, VMD-RF, VMD-ANN, CiSSA-SVR, CiSSA-RF, CiSSA-ANN, CiSSA-VMD-SVR, CiSSA-VMD-RF, and CiSSA-VMD-ANN ensemble models and Kruskal–Wallis test was used to show whether the forecasting results are statically significant. The analysis of the obtained results showed that the performance of the models (CiSSA-SVR, CiSSA-RF, and CiSSA-ANN) that use CiSSA features as input for far-day ahead predictions were significantly better than the other models. Taylor diagrams and mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), and Willmott’s refined index (WI) performance parameters revealed that the performance of the CiSSA-RF model was better. Furthermore, the CiSSA-RF model proved to be significantly much reliable for longer predicting periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar Yildirim H, Akcay C (2019) Time-cost optimization model proposal for construction projects with genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic approach. Revista De La Construcción 18(3):554–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akcay C, Manisali E (2018) Fuzzy decision support model for the selection of contractor in construction works. Revista de la Construcción. J Constr 17(2):258–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyuncu V, Uysal M, Tanyildizi H, Sumer M (2018) Modeling the weight and length changes of the concrete exposed to sulfate using artificial neural network. Revista de la Construcción. J Constr 17(3):337–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali MH, Abustan I (2014) A new novel index for evaluating model performance. Journal of Natural Resources and Development (JNRD) 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh A, Rajabi A, Shabanlou S, Yaghoubi B, Yosefvand F (2021) Modeling long-term rainfall-runoff time series through wavelet-weighted regularization extreme learning machine. Earth Sci Inform, 1–17

  • Arsenault R, Bazile R, Ouellet Dallaire C, Brissette F (2016) CANOPEX: a Canadian hydrometeorological watershed database. Hydrol Process 30(15):2734–2736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Başakın EE, Ekmekcioğlu Ö, Çıtakoğlu H, Özger M (2021) A new insight to the wind speed forecasting: robust multi-stage ensemble soft computing approach based on pre-processing uncertainty assessment. Neural Comput Appl, 1–30.

  • Bógalo J, Poncela P, Senra E (2021) Circulant singular spectrum analysis: a new automated procedure for signal extraction. Signal Process 179:107824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis forecasting and control. 1st Holden Day Inc

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragomiretskiy K, Zosso D (2013) Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62(3):531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani H (2007) Singular spectrum analysis: methodology and comparison. J Data Sci 5:239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Luo J, Zuo G, Xie J (2019) Daily runoff forecasting using a hybrid model based on variational mode decomposition and deep neural networks. Water Resour Manage 33(4):1571–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain D, Khan AA (2020) Machine learning techniques for monthly river flow forecasting of Hunza River, Pakistan. Earth Science Informatics, 1–11.

  • Juan Bógalo Román (2021). CiSSA: circulant SSA under Matlab, GitHub https://github.com/jbogalo/CiSSA/releases/tag/2.1.2. Accessed 20 May 2021

  • Kisi O, Latifoğlu L, Latifoğlu F (2014) Investigation of empirical mode decomposition in forecasting of hydrological time series. Water Resour Manage 28(12):4045–4057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahmiri S (2016) A variational mode decompoisition approach for analysis and forecasting of economic and financial time series. Expert Syst Appl 55:268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latifoğlu L, Kişi Ö, Latifoğlu F (2015) Importance of hybrid models for forecasting of hydrological variable. Neural Comput Appl 26(7):1669–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Zhou P, Chen G, Guo L (2014) Evaluating a coupled discrete wavelet transform and support vector regression for daily and monthly streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol 519:2822–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DJ (2009) Artificial neural networks (Vol. 458). Springer

  • Luo X, Yuan X, Zhu S, Xu Z, Meng L, Peng J (2019) A hybrid support vector regression framework for streamflow forecast. J Hydrol 568:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosaffa H, Sadeghi M, Mallakpour I, Jahromi MN, Pourghasemi HR (2022) Application of machine learning algorithms in hydrology. In Computers in Earth and Environmental Sciences (pp. 585–591). Elsevier

  • Nourani V, Davanlou Tajbakhsh A, Molajou A, Gokcekus H (2019) Hybrid wavelet-M5 model tree for rainfall-runoff modeling. J Hydrol Eng 24(5).

  • Oyebode O, Stretch D (2019) Neural network modeling of hydrological systems: a review of implementation techniques. Nat Resour Model 32(1):e12189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özger M (2009) Comparison of fuzzy inference systems for streamflow prediction. Hydrol Sci J 54(2):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt J (1998) Sequential minimal optimization: a fast algorithm for training support vector machines

  • Rasouli K, William WH, Cannon AJ (2012) Daily streamflow forecasting by machine learning methods with weather and climate inputs. J Hydrol 414:284–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabzi HZ, King JP, Dilekli N, Shoghli B, Abudu S (2018) Developing an ANN based streamflow forecast model utilizing data-mining techniques to improve reservoir streamflow prediction accuracy: A case study. Civ Eng J, 4(5)

  • Sivapalan M (2018) From engineering hydrology to Earth system science: milestones in the transformation of hydrologic science. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22(3):1665–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnikrishnan P, Jothiprakash V (2018) Daily rainfall forecasting for one year in a single run using singular spectrum analysis. J Hydrol 561:609–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Luo H, Grunder O, Lin Y (2017) Multi-step ahead wind speed forecasting using an improved wavelet neural network combining variational mode decomposition and phase space reconstruction. Renew Energy 113:1345–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yu Q, Yang Y (2018) Short-term wind speed forecasting using variational mode decomposition

  • Willmott CJ, Robeson SM, Matsuura K (2012) A refined index of model performance. Int J Climatol 32(13):2088–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, El-Shafie A, Jaafar O, Afan HA, Sayl KN (2015) Artificial intelligence based models for stream-flow forecasting: 2000–2015. J Hydrol 530:829–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen, Z. M., Ebtehaj, I., Bonakdari, H., Deo, R. C., Mehr, A. D., Mohtar, W. H. M. W., ... & Singh, V. P. (2017). Novel approach for streamflow forecasting using a hybrid ANFIS-FFA model. J Hydrol, 554:263-276

  • Zhang X, Peng Y, Zhang C, Wang B (2015) Are hybrid models integrated with data preprocessing techniques suitable for monthly streamflow forecasting? Some experiment evidences. J Hydrol 530:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Ye M, Yang J (2018) Developing a long short-term memory (LSTM) based model for predicting water table depth in agricultural areas. J Hydrol 561:918–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Wu P, Chen H, Liu J, Zhou L (2019) Carbon price forecasting with variational mode decomposition and optimal combined model. Physica A 519:140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zounemat-Kermani M, Batelaan O, Fadaee M, Hinkelmann R (2021a) Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 598:126266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zounemat-Kermani M, Mahdavi-Meymand A, Hinkelmann R (2021b) A comprehensive survey on conventional and modern neural networks: application to river flow forecasting. Earth Sci Inform, 1–19.

  • Zuo G, Luo J, Wang N, Lian Y, He X (2020) Decomposition ensemble model based on variational mode decomposition and long short-term memory for streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol 585:124776

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levent Latifoğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Broder J. Merkel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latifoğlu, L. Application of the novel circulant singular spectrum analysis ensemble model for forecasting of streamflow data. Arab J Geosci 15, 982 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10230-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10230-2

Keywords

Navigation