Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of empirical models for estimating hydraulic conductivity using gradation characteristics of unconsolidated fluvial sediments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic conductivity has paramount importance in hydrogeological and geotechnical studies. The estimation of hydraulic conductivity of aquifer materials is assessed through various methods, including laboratory measurements and empirical models. In this study, 60 different unlithified aquifer sediments obtained from the fluvial environment within the Himalayan Jhelum river basin were analyzed for their gradation characteristics, porosity, and hydraulic conductivities through standard procedures. The hydraulic conductivities of all the samples measured in the laboratory were compared with the values calculated through the most commonly used empirical equations to estimate hydraulic conductivity using sediment gradation characteristics developed in the past at different regions over the globe. It was observed that most of the empirical models significantly overestimated the hydraulic conductivity values except the empirical model developed by (Kozeny, Kozeny (ed), Hydraulik, Springer, Vienna, 1953). The statistical analysis revealed a poor correlation of R2 < 0.43 with high RMSE values of several orders of magnitude between the observed and estimated hydraulic conductivities. Modifications to the empirical models were done by optimizing their special beta coefficients and exponents, and applying d30 as an effective grain diameter for higher correlation statistics (R2) and fewer errors. The modified USBR model explained the highest around 61% variability of measured hydraulic conductivity values with error reduced to 1.00 m/day. The improved equation can be applied to the sandy aquifers of the investigated area for preliminary hydraulic conductivity estimation using grain-size analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal DP, Krishnamurthy RV, Kusumgar S, Nautiyal V, Authavale RN, Radhakrishnanmurthy C (1979) Chronostratigraphy of loessic and lacustrine sediments in the Kashmir Valley. India Acta Geol Acad Sci Hungaricae 22:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Alyamani MS, Şen Z (1993) Determination of hydraulic conductivity from complete grain-size distribution curves. Groundwater 31(4):551–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00587.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Testing and Materials (1995) ““Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils”. ASTM standard D422–63. West Conshohocken, PA

  • American Society of Testing and Materials (2006) ““Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head”)”. ASTM standard D2434–68. West Conshohocken, PA

  • American Society of Testing and Materials (2007a) ““Standard test methods for density of soil and rock in place by the sand replacement method in a test pit””. ASTM standard D4914–99. West Conshohocken, PA

  • American Society of Testing and Materials (2007b) ““Standard test method for density and unit weight of soil in place by the sand-cone method””. ASTM standard D1556–07. West Conshohocken, PA

  • Asoka A, Gleeson T, Wada Y, Mishra V (2017) Relative contribution of monsoon precipitation and pumping to changes in groundwater storage in India. Nat Geosci 10:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer W (1964) Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlassigkeit von Kiesen ¨ und Sanden aus der Kornverteilungskurve. Wasserwirtschaft Wassertechnik 14(6):165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat SU, Mushtaq S, Qayoom U, Sabha I (2020) Water quality scenario of Kashmir Himalayan Springs—a case study of Baramulla District, Kashmir Valley. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04796-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadu FK (2000) Hydraulic conductivity of soils from grain-size distribution: new models. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(8):739–746. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:8(739)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brutsaert W, Nieber JL (1977) Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau. Water Resour Res 13(3):637–643. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR013i003p00637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1962) “Indian standard specification for test sieves”. IS: 460. New Delhi, India

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1973) ““Indian standard methods of test for soils Part—2””. IS: 2720. Determination of water content. New Delhi, India

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1974) ““Indian standard methods of test for soils—part 28””. IS: 2720. Determination of dry density of soils, in place, by sand replacement method, reaffirmed 2010. New Delhi, India

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1985) ““Indian standard methods of test for soils Part— 4””. IS: 2720. Grain size analysis. New Delhi, India

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1986) ““Indian standard methods of test for soils—part 17””. IS: 2720. Laboratory determination of permeability. New Delhi, India

  • Butler Jr (2019) The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  • Carrier WD (2003) Goodbye, hazen; hello, kozeny-carman. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(11):1054–1056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:11(1054)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman PM, Preene M (2001) Groundwater lowering in construction: a practical guide. Spon Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandel A, Shankar V (2021) Evaluation of empirical relationships to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of borehole soil samples. ISH J Hydraul Eng 1–10

  • Chapuis RP, Dallaire V, Marcotte D, Chouteau M, Acevedo N, Gagnon F (2005) Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity at three different scales within an unconfined aquifer at Lachenaie, Quebec. Can Geotech J 42(4):1212–1220. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirpka OA (2003) Environmental fluid mechanics I: flow in natural hydrosystems. J Hydrol 283:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Y, Shangguan W, Duan Q, Liu B, Fu S, Niu G (2013) Development of a China dataset of soil hydraulic parameters using pedotransfer functions for land surface modeling. J Hydrometeorol 14(3):869–887. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0149.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel DE (1993) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dar RA, Mir SA, Romshoo SA (2019) Influence of geomorphic and anthropogenic activities on channel morphology of River Jhelum in Kashmir Valley, NW Himalayas. Quat Int 507(2019):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein JH, Niswonger RG, Fogg GE (2006) River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management. Groundwater 44(6):837–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00190.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganju JL, Khar BM (1984) Tectonics and hydrocarbon prospects of Kashmir valley-possible exploration targets. Pet Asian J 207–216

  • Harleman DR, Mehlhorn PF, Rumer Jr RR (1963) Dispersion-permeability correlation in porous media. J Hydraul Div 89(2):67–85. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0000863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen A (1892) Some physical properties of sands and gravels, with special reference to their use in filtration. Massachusetts State Board of Health. 24th Annual Report. 39–556

  • Hazen A (1911) Discussion of dams on sand foundations. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 73:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishaku JM, Gadzama EW, Kaigama U (2011) Evaluation of empirical formulae for the determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis. J Geol Min Res 3(4):105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabro JD (1992) Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data. Trans ASAE 35(2):557–560. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeelani G (2008) Hydrogeology of hard rock aquifer in Kashmir Valley: complexities and uncertainties. In: Ahmed S, Jayakumar R, Salih A (eds) Groundwater dynamics in hard rock aquifers. Springer, Dordrecht (Netherlands), pp 243–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jeelani GH, Shah RA, Hussain A (2014) Hydrogeochemical assessment of groundwater in Kashmir Valley, India. J Earth Syst Sci 123:1031–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose F (2016) Determination of hydraulic conductivities through grain-size analysis. M. Sc. Thesis submitted to Boston College (USA)

  • Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M (2006) Measuring methods for groundwater–surface water interactions: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(6):873–887. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-873-2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasenow M (2002) Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain size analysis. Water Resources Publication, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozeny J (1953) Das Wasser im Boden. Grundwasserbewegung. In: Kozeny J (ed) Hydraulik. Springer, Vienna, pp 380–445

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2010) Self-cleaning beach gallery design for seawater desalination plants. Desalination Water Treat 13(1–3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masch FD, Denny KJ (1966) Grain size distribution and its effect on the permeability of unconsolidated sands. Water Resour Res 2(4):665–677. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR002i004p00665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss CS (1910) A revision of the Silurian-Trias sequence in Kashmir. Geol Surv India 40:206–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss CS (1911) Sections in the Pir Panjal range and Sindh Valley, Kashmir. Rec Geol Surv India 41:15–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir RA, Lone KA (2020) A recent scenario of groundwater quality in Kashmir, Northwest Himalaya, India. In: Bioremediation and Biotechnology, Vol 4. Springer, pp 39–63

  • Missimer TM, Watson I, Maliva RG, Pankratz TM (2009) Water supply development, aquifer storage, and concentrate disposal for membrane water treatment facilities. Schlumberger Limited, Texas

  • Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12(3):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushtaq F, Pandey AC (2014) Assessment of land use/land cover dynamics vis-à-vis hydrometeorological variability in Wular Lake environs Kashmir Valley, India using multitemporal satellite data. Arab J Geosci 7(11):4707–4715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1092-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obianyo JI (2020) Investigation of empirical models for hydraulic conductivity from grain-size distribution. FUPRE J Sci Ind Res 4:60–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Odong J (2007) Evaluation of empirical formulae for determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis. J Am Sci 3(3):54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder GF, Celia MA (2006) Subsurface hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pliakas F, Petalas C (2011) Determination of hydraulic conductivity of unconsolidated river alluvium from permeameter tests, empirical formulas and statistical parameters effect analysis. Water Resour Manag 25(11):2877–2899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9844-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pravedny GH (1966) Design and selection of grain size composition of filter beds for the transition zones of large dams. Energiia, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosas J, Lopez O, Missimer TM, Coulibaly KM, Dehwah AH, Sesler K, Lujan LR, Mantilla D (2014) Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain-size distribution for different depositional environments. Groundwater 52(3):399–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu S, Saha D (2016) Empirical methods and estimation of hydraulic conductivity of fluvial aquifers. Environ Eng Geosci 22(4):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.22.4.319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salarashayeri AF, Siosemarde M (2012) Prediction of soil hydraulic conductivity from particle-size distribution. Int J Geol Environ Eng 6(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1055779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Vila X, Guadagnini A, Carrera J (2006) Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow. Rev Geophys 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000169

  • Schwartz FW, Zhang H (2003) Groundwater. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh IB (1982) Sedimentation pattern in the Karewa Basin, Kashmir Valley, India, and its geological significance. J Palaeontol Soc India 27:71–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Slichter CS (1899) Theoretical investigation of the motion of ground waters. The 19th Ann. Rep. US Geophys Survey 304–319

  • Song J, Chen X, Cheng C, Wang D, Lackey S, Xu Z (2009) Feasibility of grain-size analysis methods for determination of vertical hydraulic conductivity of streambeds. J Hydrol 375(3–4):428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner WF, Balsillie JH (1995) Environmental clastic granulometry. Geological Survey Special Publication, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1925) Principles of soil mechanics. Eng News-Record 95(19–27):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma KO, Egboka BCE, Onuoha KM (1989) New statistical grain-size method for evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of sandy aquifers. J Hydrol 108:343–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90293-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic M, Soro A (1992) Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain-size composition. Water Resources Publications, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadia DN (1975) Geology of India. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JP, François B, Lambert P (2017) Equations for hydraulic conductivity estimation from particle size distribution: a dimensional analysis. Water Resour Res 53(9):8127–8134. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaz SN, Romshoo SA, Krishnamoorthy RT, Viswanadhapalli Y (2019) Analyses of temperature and precipitation in the Indian Jammu and Kashmir region for the 1980–2016 period: implications for remote influence and extreme events. Atmos Chem Phys 19(1):15–37. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Schaap MG (2019) Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with pedotransfer functions: a review. J Hydrol 575:1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is implemented by NPIU, which is a unit of MHRD, Govt. of India, for implementation of World Bank Assisted Projects in Technical Education. The productive discussions and invaluable assistance in conducting field operations, the contributions of Amir Khanday, Waseem Ahmad, Jasir Mushtaq, and Mir Dabeer are highly appreciated.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP-III).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Aasif Khaja.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Broder J. Merkel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaja, M.A., Shah, S.R. & Jha, R. Evaluation of empirical models for estimating hydraulic conductivity using gradation characteristics of unconsolidated fluvial sediments. Arab J Geosci 15, 720 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10002-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10002-y

Keywords

Navigation