Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of rangeland management plans from the viewpoints of beneficiaries, experts, and managers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to research variables affecting rangeland management plans (RMPs) in four provinces of Lorestan, Ilam, Kurdistan, and Kermanshah. The statistical population of the study consisted of RMPs approved within the period 1991–2017 of the four provinces, which are considered supported identities and audits. Three special questionnaires, i.e., managers, experts, and beneficiaries, were prepared to realize the goal of the study. Examination of the logistic unit (logit) model results for beneficiaries showed that the variables of deficiency within the preparation of RMPs by experts (consulting firms), lack of continuous supervision over the right implementation of RMPs, lack of coaching classes for beneficiaries, shortage of state funding, control of ranchers’ grazing licenses, restoration operations, the balance between livestock and long-term grazing capacity, the acceptance level of rural governors and councils of rangeland RMPs, were effective within the effectiveness of RMPs. The effectiveness, ineffectiveness, and negative impacts of RMPs were declared by 40, 34, and 25% of beneficiaries. A total of 13% of experts believe that it had a negative effect. A total of 65% of beneficiaries and 47% of experts are against renting pastures to nomadic and non-rural pastoralists. Overall, the prevailing RMPs within the study area were not sufficiently effective because of socio-economic technical problems, necessitating reconsideration during this regard. Thus, socio-economic technical issues should be considered more seriously within the preparation of the latest RMPs. Moreover, plans designed following socio-economic ecological conditions should be implemented consistent with the number, quality, and schedule of every project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abolhassani L, Oesten G, Rajmis S, Azadi H (2013) Attitudes of rangeland holders towards sustainable range management in Iran: a case study of the Semnan rangelands. Rangeland J 35(4):435. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ11079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aeine Beygi S, Khaleghi MR (2016) An assessment biennial enclosure effects on range production condition and trend. Int J soil erosion 6(2):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bukhari A, Hallett S, Brewer T (2018) A review of potential methods for monitoring rangeland degradation in Libya. Pastoralism 8:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-018-0118-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh MJ, Kavianpour MR, Danesh M, Adolf J, Shamshirband S, Chau KW (2018) Effect of river flow on the quality of estuarine and coastal waters using machine learning models. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 12(1):810–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1528480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzani H, Barkhordari S, Motamedi (Turkan) J, Azarnivand H (2010) Equivalent to livestock unit and daily requirement of Baluchi sheep grazing in winter rangelands in the south of Kerman province, Halilrud watershed. Iran J Anim Sci 41 (4): 351-363.

  • Awgachew S, Flintan F, Bekure S (2015) Participatory rangeland management planning and its implementation in Ethiopia. In: Paper presented at the 2015 World Band Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, D.C., 23-27 March 2015. CARE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadi H, Samari D, Zarafshani K, Hosseininia G (2013) Witlox F (2012) Sustainable forest management in Iran: a factor analysis. Sustainability Sci 8:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0190-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azarnivand H, Alizadeh E, Sour A, Hajibeglo A (2012) The effects of range management plans of soil properties and rangelands vegetation (Case Study: Eshtehard Rangelands). J Rangeland Sci 2(4):625–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Bullock JM, Lavorel S et al (2021) Combatting global grassland degradation. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2:720–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedunah DJ, Angerer JP (2012) Rangeland Degradation, poverty, and conflict: how can rangeland scientists contribute to effective responses and solutions? Rangeland Ecol Manage 65(6):606–612. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00155.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock DL, Fernández-Giménez M, Hiernaux P, Huber-Sannwald E, Schloeder C et al (2017) Rangeland systems in developing nations: conceptual advances and societal implications. In: Briske D (ed) Rangeland Syst 569-641. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer JS (2003) The origins and development of the logit model. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dastgheyb Shirazi SS, Ahmadi A, Abdi N, Toranj H, Khaleghi MR (2021a) Investigation of the effect of long-term grazing exclosure on the soil's physicochemical properties in arid and semi-arid rangelands (Case study: Bozdaghin rangelands, North Khorasan, Iran). Environ Monit Assess 193(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08819-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dastgheyb Shirazi SS, Ahmadi A, Abdi N, Toranj H, Khaleghi MR (2021b) Moderate grazing is the best measure to achieve the optimal conservation and soil resources utilization (case study: Bozdaghin rangelands, North Khorasan, Iran). Environ Monit Assess 193(9):549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09334-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eftekhari AR, Arzani H, Mehrabi AA, Jafari M (2012) Investigation on effects of range management plans, property size and pastoralist population on rangeland characteristics (case study: Zarandyeh Rangelands). World Appl Sci J 18(10). https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.10.1003

  • Entezari Zarch A, Ahmadi H, Moeini A (2021) Pazira E (2021) Impacts of environmental and human factors on desertification-induced land degradation in arid areas. Arab J Geosci 14:2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08745-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2017) The future of food and agriculture – trends and challenges, Rome

  • Fuhlendorf SD, Engle MD, Elmore RD, Limb RF, Bidwell TG (2012) Conservation of pattern and process: developing an alternative paradigm of rangeland management. Rangeland Ecol Manage 65:579–589. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00109.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getabalew M, Alemneh T (2019) Factors affecting the productivity of rangelands. J Plant Sci Agric Res 3(1):19

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitchmidt RK (1990) The role of livestock and other herbivores in improving rangeland vegetation. J Rangeland 12(3):112–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek JL, Pieper RD, Herbel CH (2001) Range management principles & practices. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 557P

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseininia GH, Azadi H, Zarafshani K, Samari D, Witlox F (2013) Sustainable rangeland management: pastoralists' attitudes toward integrated programs in Iran. J Arid Environ 92:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge GG, Hill RC, Griffithes WE, Lukepohl H, Lee TC (1988) The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York. The USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamrani K, Arzani H, Javadi SA, Nejad RA (2019) Rangeland condition and the appropriate rangeland management methods. J Agric Sci 26:524–531. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.556745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami H, Rahimi Sureh S (2012) Investigation of the results of assigned rangeland management plans in Lorestan province. Rural Dev Q 15(2):17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanmohamadi M, Ariapour A, Razzaghi MH (2012) Comparison of experts and rangers’ opinions on prioritizing barriers in participation of rangers in range plans (case study: Tehran Province- Lar Moor). J Rangeland Sci 2(4):655–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravipour B, Abdeshahi A, Barzegar M, Soleimani Harouni KH (2019) Factors affecting the collaboration of beneficiaries in irrigation projects in the eastern villages of Ramhormoz city. Coop Agric 8(31):57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohestani N, Yeganeh H (2016) Study the effects of range management plans on vegetation of summer rangelands of Mazandaran Province, Iran. J Rangeland Sci 6(3):195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharia PN, Ekaya WN (2005) The impact of rangeland condition and trend to the grazing resources of a semi-arid environment in Kenya. J Hum Ecol 17(2):143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (1983) Introduction to econometrics. Formerly of Ohio State University, Third Edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JE (ed) (2010) Criteria and indicators of sustainable rangeland management. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming Extension Publication No. SM-56. 227 p

  • Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 16:371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920390190032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M, Lutz K, Berlinger B (1992) Rangeland management benefits livestock and wildlife. Rangelands 14(2):73–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo Y, Alados CL, Ferrer-Benimeli C (2006) Is the analysis of plant community structure better than common species-diversity indices for assessing the effects of livestock grazing on a Mediterranean Arid Ecosystems? J Arid Environ 64:698–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn CH, Huby M, Kiwasilla H, Lovett CJ (2007) Design principle and common pool resource management: an institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania. J Environ Manage 27(1):100–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawat GS (2013) Strategies for the management of high altitude rangelands and their interfaces in Kailash Sacred Landscape. In: Ning, W. et. al. (Eds.). High Altitude Rangelands and Their Interfaces in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. Kathmandu. ICIMOD. Pp: 25-36.

  • Roudgarmi P, Amoozadeh Mahdiraji MT (2020) Current challenges of laws for preservation of forest and rangeland, Iran. Land Use Policy 99:105002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmanicheraghabadi A, Poursaeed A, Bayramzadeh V, Eshraghi-Samani R (2021) Social network analysis of sustainable forest management actors in Zagros Region. Arab J Geosci 14:2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09032-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer J, Berry HL, O’Brien LV (2013) Healthier land, healthier beneficiaries: considering the potential of natural resource management as a place-focused farmer health intervention. Health Place 24:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns JF, Booij MJ, Hoekstra AY (2017) The water footprint of wood for lumber, pulp, paper, fuel and firewood. Adv Water Resour 107:490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharafatmandrad M, Khosravi Mashizi A (2021) Ecological succession regulates the relationship between biodiversity and supporting services in arid ecosystems. Arab J Geosci 14:1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07796-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sick D (2008) Social contexts and consequences of institutional change in common-pool resource management. Soc Nat Resour 21(2):94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701681524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires VR, Gaur MK (2020) Food security and land use change under conditions of climatic variability; a multidimensional perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36762-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens M, Kolbl A, Totsche KU, Kogel I (2008) Grazing effects on soils chemical and physical properties in a semi-arid steppe of Inner Mongolia (P. R. China). J Geoderma 143:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka JA, Rimbey N, Torell LA (2005) Rangeland economics, ecology and sustainability: implications for policy and economic research. West Econ Forum:1–6

  • Tavakoli H, Fayaz M, Hasanzadeh M (2013) Determination of performance of Khorasan Razavi province management plans with fuzzy Delphi approach and multi-criteria decision-making models. J Agric Econ Dev 27(1):37–50 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague WR, Dowhower SL (2002) Patch dynamics under rotational and continuous grazing management in large, heterogeneous paddocks. J Arid Environ 53:211–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd SW, Hoffer RM, Milchunas DG (1998) Biomass estimation on grazed and ungrazed rangeland using spectral indices. J Remote Sens 19(3):427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TWI2050-the World in 2050 (2018) Transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Report prepared by the World in 2050 initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria. www.twi2050.org

  • Walker B (1993) Rangeland ecology: understanding and managing change. Ambio 22:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Mang S, Cai H, Liu S, Zhang Z et al (2016) Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends. J For Res 27:967–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0293-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waruingi E, Mbeche R, Ateka J (2021) Determinants of forest dependent household's participation in payment for ecosystem services: evidence from plantation establishment livelihood improvement scheme (PELIS) in Kenya. Global Ecol Conserv 26(e):01514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Meir I (1989) Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manage 42(4):266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CL, Chau KW (2013) Prediction of rainfall time series using modular soft computing methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(3):997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Guo Y, Zhou J (2020) Nexus between ecological conservation and socio-economic development and its dynamics: insights from a case in China. Water 12(3):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanda PZ, Yatich TBT, Ochola WO, Ngece N (2010) Natural resource management in the context of climate change. In book: Managing Natural Resources for Development in Africa (pp.54) Edition: 1st EditionChapter: 6Publisher: University of Nairobi Press (UoNP) and International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR) Editors: Washington O. Ochola; Pascal C. Sanginga and Isaac Bekal

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the personnel of the forests, range, and watershed management organization of Markazi province to supply the secondary meteorological data and help us with data preprocessing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Ahmadi.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate

All participants consent to participate in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Amjad Kallel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baharvandi, M., Abdi, N., Ahmadi, A. et al. The effectiveness of rangeland management plans from the viewpoints of beneficiaries, experts, and managers. Arab J Geosci 15, 699 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09952-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09952-0

Keywords

Navigation